79°
forecast

Navy chief in hazing scandal fights for full pension

Posted to: Military

NORFOLK

Lawyers for a Navy senior chief implicated in a hazing scandal in Bahrain say he's been smeared by "scurrilous allegations" and are mounting a vigorous defense in hopes that he can retire at full pay.

A three-member board convened Thursday to consider the retirement of Michael Toussaint, a master-at-arms who served as kennel master of the military working-dog unit in Bahrain from 2004 to 2006.

An investigation shortly after Toussaint left the unit documented more than 90 instances of hazing and abuse of junior personnel. Sailors told of being forced to eat dog treats, hogtied to chairs, locked into a feces-filled kennel and told to simulate oral sex during a training event.

The admiral who endorsed the investigation noted that the unit's senior enlisted leaders encouraged - and in some cases instigated - hazing. Toussaint received a nonpunitive letter of caution and was later promoted. He is assigned to Naval Special Warfare Group Two at Joint Expeditionary Base Little Creek in Virginia Beach.

Lt. Cmdr. Keith Lofland, one of Toussaint's two military defense lawyers, said Toussaint strongly denies any allegations of hazing, maltreatment or fraternization.

"The only victim in this board is Senior Chief Toussaint," Lofland said, adding that Toussaint's accusers were disgruntled sailors "who chafed under what can only be characterized as effective leadership."

Another sailor implicated in the hazing killed herself in Bahrain as the investigation was wrapping up. Petty Officer 1st Class Jennifer Valdivia, who managed the kennel after Toussaint departed, died in January 2007, shortly after learning she might be disciplined for not reporting the hazing.

Last fall, after concerns surfaced about how the Navy handled the investigation and its findings, Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Gary Roughead reopened the matter. Roughead rescinded Toussaint's re-enlistment, which would have had him serve through 2012.

In October, the secretary of the Navy issued a letter of censure, and the Navy began processing Toussaint out of the service.

Officials decided not to court-martial Toussaint, citing the time that had passed since the original investigation and his being months away from qualifying for retirement.

The board - two officers and a master chief petty officer - spent Thursday reading hundreds of pages of background, including the original investigation as well as copies of Toussaint's awards, performance evaluations and letters of support from colleagues and family members. To day, the three men will hear testimony from witnesses.

The board will recommend at what paygrade Toussaint should retire, but the final determination will be made by an assistant secretary of the Navy.

One of the documents the board received was Toussaint's rebuttal to the secretarial letter of censure. In the 14-page letter, he denies directing personnel to participate in sexually explicit training exercises. He says he encouraged trainers to come up with realistic training scenarios and told them about situations he encountered as a master-at-arms.

"While I recall sharing a 'sea story' about a call that involved two sailors involved in homosexual acts, I strongly deny ever dictating that any sailor perform degrading or embarrassing acts of this kind," he wrote.

Toussaint also denied ordering someone to bend over a copy machine to get spanked.

"Under the circumstances, I doubt that I would have interfered if this event were characterized as modest 'birthday' spankings," he wrote. "However, if this occurred in an offensive or coercive manner, I would have taken action immediately to end it."

The rebuttal contains testimonials from more than two dozen sailors, many lauding him for bravery during combat last year in Afghanistan. Some of them are expected to testify to day. Also on the witness list: sailors who say they were targets of Toussaint's abuse in Bahrain.

Although the hearing is in a Navy courtroom and will include testimony given under oath, it is not a court-martial. Only Toussaint's retirement pay is at stake.

Retiring as a senior chief would bring Toussaint about $25,100 this year. A newly retired chief petty officer would collect about $22,800, and a petty officer first class about $19,500.

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

Heroism doesn't exempt from pushishment--or entitle

Read the tale of Illinois' Kerner and Ryan...no pensions for them..

Perhaps because IL is more “corrupt” than or military service, IL is comfortable punishing those who betray the public trust. No pensions for former heros. A must read.

www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/ct-oped-0301-ryan-20100301,0,5914196.story

Kerner did not prevail despite the pathos. Neither did his children. After his death, the Illinois Supreme Court reviewed the situation and stood firmly in 1978 behind a law barring public pensions for those who betray the public's trust. Now it has reaffirmed that stance with respect to another former governor who also has suffered mightily for his transgressions.

Enough of Egos --Time to Pay Respects to Valvidia

I've read enough, including the redacted investigation issued by the Navy in 2007 which is published on the NPR web site (below). As a parent of a dedicated young Marine, I would prefer NOT to believe that sadistic and bullying behavior ("training" ) went on at the Kennel) but enough insiders have told me "not to surprised".

www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=121712160

Time to pay respects to Miss Jennifer Valvidia--and offer condolences to her family. While I don't presume to know in what manner Toussaint may have reached out to her family-- if my son committed suicide and his former CO did not try to offer some explanation or condolence to our family, I would be convinced of his complicity in her emotional state (fear?) and suicide. The tragedy here is way bigger than egos are retirement pensions.

hazed-been there

shaun, joseph, scott & all others "hazed" (yes "hazed"-there is a difference "mr. salty"), until they walk in our shoes i do not believe they cannot understand. maybe ignorance on their part? maybe just just the way they were "raised"? as victims/now survivors we do not have to apologize for what happened to us. it is what is it is. a higher power will take care of the rest. in this case, i agree the E-8 who's graveling for more $$$, let it go. being a chief myself, toussaint didn't get there by being a bad sailor. has he made a huge mistake yes, should he be punished-absolutely. but, the board has spoken and whatever actions needed to be taken are in place. we may not like the results. again, it is what it is. has he apologized? this would make a difference. i think it is an acknowledgement issue. po scott cool's case-different outcome-success! my case-hazed during cpo initiation/hospitalized, jag investigation-however-it never got this far. i wish i were as brave as po rocha to come forward after the fact, but i was not allowed via foia to have a copy of my jag report therefore-i let it go. it is what it is. we move on. understanding and acknowledgemnt. hence, counseli

shaun, joseph, scott & all

shaun, joseph, scott & all others "hazed" (yes "hazed"-there is a difference "mr. salty"), until they walk in our shoes i do not believe they cannot understand. maybe ignorance on their part? maybe just just the way they were "raised"? as victims/now survivors we do not have to apologize for what happened to us. it is what is it is. a higher power will take care of the rest. in this case, i agree the E-8 who's graveling for more $$$, let it go. being a chief myself, toussaint didn't get there by being a bad sailor. has he made a huge mistake yes, should he be punished-absolutely. but, the board has spoken and whatever actions needed to be taken are in place. we may not like the results. again, it is what it is. has he apologized? this would make a difference. i think it is an acknowledgement issue. po scott cool's case-different outcome-success! my case-hazed during cpo initiation/hospitalized, jag investigation-however-it never got this far. i wish i were as brave as po rocha to come forward after the fact, but i was not allowed via foia to have a copy of my jag report therefore-i let it go. it is what it is. we move on. understanding and acknowledgemnt. hence, counseli

In Civilian Life there are no guarantees or heroic redemptions

JamesMom; I have a son in the Marines, but I am a civilian; I have 30 years of cororate human resources outplacement "transition" experience (that means) I help folks get back to work after "through rarely any fault of their own" they have been cast off, fired, dumped, disrespected, and often humiliated in the process--without any chance for redemption of their honor through an act of bravery. I traffic in corporate politics, litigation, pensions and reputations. I would NEVER presume to speak for wounded warriors, I am just a dedicated contributor to the WW Foundation--God bless them. I am more disturbed by what this sad chapter says about Navy management. My advice to Toussaint is to get "transition counseling' for his new life in the no guarantee civlian world; read Illiad-focus on Achilles.

Must have been my imagination

I don’t understand how explaining something I saw with my own eyes can be called a lie. Did I just have a 12 month dream? Maybe I was just in some kind of strange coma where I had visions of cleaning dog poop in the Bahrain desert. I guess it’s possible. I’m glad that’s cleared up because now I realize that I took 4 days out of my life to go to Virginia and talk about stories that I made up to impress military personnel that have no impact on my life. I owe a big thanks to all of the people on here who pointed out that I, along with several others, have no integrity and that I get my jollies off of trying to ruin someone’s life for no reason at all. I can now seek the mental health counseling I so desperately need.

leadership

Leadership comes in my different forms. Those who recognize it take it on board and learn. Those who don't fail...failure is upon those who don't get it and don't get the military. There is a chances that people don't understand great leadership and mistake it for hazing and/or abuse. I believe this to be the case here. If a person believes in something hard enough, they begin to believe it's the truth, but the fact remains that the complete case was reviewed, testimony was heard, and the board made their decision. Everyone can say what they want, but you can't dispute the fact that everything was reviewed to include the investigation that caused the stir, and the accusers had their day on the stand under oath. So, with all of that said, SeniorChief (not E-8) Toussaint was recommended by the board to be able to retire at his current rank.

Charges not proven in court

pacemaker,

"Something" must have been "proven" to yield a "compromise" ruling of "discharge but with the E-8 pay".
There are many similarities between the Navy and "Big" private bureaucracies-and folks rise and fall in them for many of the same reasons—not usually how well they do their job-but politics. Perhaps I prejudged this case because I see the organizational problems of the Navy—the “political correctness” issues. Where there is a “protected class” there is need for unassailable behavior and if that means ending code reds and hazing that used to be acceptable—time to adapt. In corporate America, folks with 20 years excellent performance lose “their jobs which go to India. There are no guarantees.

You fight in the name of civilians, and we pay your salary

JamesOM:

As a civilian, I have a right to know that someone who has "retired" from the military has a clean and honorable record if I will be paying for that retirement or hiring him for 2nd career. Military personnel fight on my behalf and in my name and I am deeply appreciative of their service and heroism. But with years of a corporate career HR litigation experience, I knowy it's very hard to prove lying, cover up, or even the original act of harassment (and I am not taking a stand for gays in the military.) What seems to be equally at stake here, is the courage of "the organization" on both sides of this case, to "stand up" and tell the whole story. Toussaint kept his mouth shut because his lawyer told him to. Where's the courage? Where were the "multitudes" of witnesses? Sad for the Navy.Tragic for wounded warriors and those who gave their lives for us.

Again, trust me, those

Again, trust me, those wounded warriors wouldn't want you speaking for them on a subject you know nothing about. I know because I am married to one. Nice try though.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: Military rss feed   



Toolbox


 

special features