The Virginian-Pilot
©
NORFOLK
Most homeowners and businesses will see a small drop in their real estate taxes on July 1, City Manager Regina V.K. Williams said.
Williams told the City Council on Tuesday that real estate assessments on homeowners will fall an average of about 3 percent in the budget year that begins on July 1. The average assessment on older homes will fall at a slightly higher rate, she said.
Assessments on businesses will decline an average of about 5 percent, she added.
It is the first time in two decades that assessments will fall. However, Larry Gregory, who heads the Norfolk Tea Party II, a group that has advocated for lower taxes, said assessments aren't falling fast enough.
Residential real estate assessments were flat last year in Norfolk while they declined 4 percent in Virginia Beach, which projects an overall 6.5 percent decline this year.
"Three percent doesn't appear to accurately reflect what homes are selling for now," Gregory said, adding that he expected a double-digit decrease.
Mayor Paul Fraim defended the assessments, saying new home construction kept the number from dropping more than it did.
Regina Williams and budget director Ron Williams Jr. told the council that the city faces large deficits each of the next five years. By law, the state must trim spending or raise taxes to balance its budget.
Because of declining revenues, the city's budget will shrink next year for the second year in a row. Even so, Regina Williams said that if the city does not reduce spending beyond current projections, it will run a $36 million deficit in next year's budget. If an $18.6 million reduction in state funding for the schools is included, the deficit runs to $55 million.
There will likely be no raises for employees and layoffs are possible.
The projected deficit for the budget that begins July 1, 2011, is $83 million, Ron Williams said.
"We'll be doing the core services people expect, such as public safety, water and trash pickup," Fraim said. But otherwise, all departments must reduce their budgets, he said. Regina Williams has already asked most city departments to trim their proposed budgets by 5 percent.
Ron Williams told the council that the city faces nearly a $5 million deficit in the current $1.1 billion budget unless costs are reduced. Regina Williams has ordered a hiring freeze and other cuts, including a reduction in police overtime.
She is also considering a one-day unpaid furlough for city employees. Ron Williams said that would save the city more than $1 million.
"It's something we'd like to avoid, but if we don't have enough savings in other areas, then we may have to do it," Regina Williams said.
Harry Minium, (757) 446-2371, harry.minium@pilotonline.com

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo
City appraisals Inflated out of Greed
Most of the homes in my neighborhood were worth about two hundred thousand dollars three years ago. A few people in the neighborhood remodeled their homes and then sold them for perhaps a little over the three hundred thousand dollar mark. A few of the remodels sold and the city said that since the tax appraisal for homes is based on recent home sales, that now all of the homes in the area were worth over three hundred thousand dollars whether they had been remodeled or not. This was done by the city out of sheer greed to collect exorbitant property taxes and now the disastrous result is obvious.
Revenue vs. Cuts
I have been and will continue to be a critic of Norfolk's management and leadership but in fairness, Norfolk is facing the same unprecedented challenges that all states and local governments are facing. But it is overly simplistic to just yell cut, cut, cut. The city budget is posted on their website. Thoughtful critics will take the time to review this and offer feasible suggestions. Capital projects with annual debt service are legtimate targets but outside of selling infrastructure or defaulting on bonds, these projects cannot just be "cut." So which services should be cut or eliminated? Look at the budget and make specifc suggestions. It's easy to be a critic. It's much more difficult to be a responsible and thoughtful critic.
Look at the budget and make specifc suggestions.
OK.
Here is one. Dissolve the NRHA.
Savings: $100,000,000.00
Here is another: End all subsides of Festevents and the Arts.
Savings: Millions of dollars.
And another: Norfolk Communications Department
Savings: Millions of dollars.
I have studied the budget and I have other cost cutting suggestions but I hope you get the point.
THESE ARE ALL NON-ESSENTIAL SERVICES.
Simple.
Meanwhile, on Craigslist,
Meanwhile, on Craigslist, ads like this have appeared, "BY THE BAY, $68,000 BELOW CITY ASSESSMENT! (Norfolk)."
If cities need the money, lower the assessments and raise the tax rate. The housing market is only supported by gov't bail out. Once this stop BOOM goes the room.
Craigs list
There are no valid real estate sales on Craig's List. This is a desperation sale. "I need the money NOW". Duress.
You sound like. . .
a Norfolk Tax Assessor! 'Those sales' (foreclosures, trusts, estates, auctions) don't count against the assessment becuase they are not person to person sales.
But they sure count against our comps if we do try to sell.
That's just wrong
They shouldn't count against your appraisal, because they not, as you stated, person to person sales. You appraiser should never use them. That's why there are so many low-balled appraisals out there.
Incorrect
the appraiser is trying to find out the true value of our home, the value is what people are willing to pay for a house in a certain area. Supply and Demand. If nothing is selling for whatever reason, over built, no local economy/industry, etc, people can't sell. If people cant sell prices drop. In some cases people will get foreclosed and prices will drop even further. The Bank, the one the appraisal is really for, will not (should not) loan 100k to someone in a neighborhood where houses are only selling for 50k. That is pretty much what got us in the position we are in today. However, you are incorrect that appraisals are 'low balled' there was a correction and prices may be lower than you may like but in fact the Tax Assessments are unrealistic. Appraisals and Tax Assessments should be tied to the EXACT same criteria. They are not. It's like going into a store and paying sales tax, if an item is on sale you pay tax on the sale price not the retail value, same here.
Where and when
did you take your basic assessment or appraisal course? You can't just pull "facts" out of the air. There's a specific way to appraise real estate, and you don't know what you're talking about.
This is not the worse year for foreclosures. 1994 was the topper. Under no circumstances should foreclosure sales be used to determine assessed values. If you and I own identical houses, side-by-side, and I borrow $50,000 against mine and fail to repay, is yours then worth $50,000? Balderdash!
nonsense
I've had my home appraised twice in the last 120 days. (East Beach,Ocean View) This was necessitated by a painfully slow mortgage process. The first appraisal was in the 400K range, ninety days later it dropped to 360K. Need any more proof that we're being manipulated?