Perilous times for Virginia’s arts

Posted to: Editorials Opinion Virginia

It's jarring to think of Virginia as the worst place in the country for supporting the arts. But Alabama does better by its arts community. So do Oklahoma and West Virginia.

Now Virginia lawmakers have proposed an unparalleled move, even for these dreary times. Virginia, home to the only national park for the performing arts in the United States, is considering shuttering the state’s arts commission.

The state House is recommending cutting the budget of the Virginia Commission for the Arts in half starting in July. In 2011, the commission would be eliminated entirely, leaving Virginia the only state without one.

There’s no question the commonwealth’s budget crisis is dire, with urban schools and health care for poor children among the most defenseless targets of Gov. Bob McDonnell and House budget leaders.

But it’s also unthinkable to do away with the agency that lures talent, tourists and businesses to the commonwealth, that supports music and theater and the jobs they provide, encourages painters and poets and ensures that grants from the National Endowment for the Arts are sprinkled throughout Virginia.

This is, after all, the home of jazz great Ella Fitzgerald and country music legend Patsy Cline. It’s where  fiction writers Edgar  Allan Poe and William Styron grew up. It’s a state that long has recognized the importance of the arts to a vital economy. Museums, theaters, orchestras and dance troupes from the Eastern Shore to Appalachia have benefited from the commission’s nurturing.

In Hampton Roads, arts enthusiasts worry about the renowned Virginia Symphony, which has struggled to pay its bills in this economy. If it shuts down, we lose not only access to professional concerts but also the classical musicians who live here, who direct music programs in churches and schools, play at weddings and introduce youngsters to strings and brass and Beethoven.

Already, the Commission for the Arts has lost 30 percent of its funding since 2008. The Senate plan wisely would keep the commission’s budget at its current level, $4.4 million, but the House version would cut it in half.

The governor seems to recognize the value of arts and entertainment, because he has recommended spending more money in this lousy economy to lure the film industry here as a way to create jobs .

McDonnell’s own hometown shows how catering to the arts can reap benefits. A study by Americans for the Arts found that arts and cultural nonprofits last year generated $56.8 million in economic activity in Virginia Beach, brought $2.3 million in taxes to the city and $3.6 million to the state.

Creating jobs and growing the economy were signature campaign issues for nearly every state official elected last year. It makes no sense now to renege on those promises by butchering an industry that has done nothing but stimulate spending.

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

Perilous times for Virginia’s arts

Well said. However, obsessing with the legendary and shaky finances of the Virginia Symphony is simply a waste of time. Word of mouth for years now in our arts community is that the Symphony's inevitable bankruptcy will merely allow a non-hostile merger/takeover by the Virginia Arts Festival. This activity has apparently been in the works for years now. Check out who is the "interim" executive director of the Symphony currently and be in tune with the arts in Hampton Roads. You may also read D. Nicholson's article on the subject in the Daily News, when the "interim executive director" position was "quietly" announced.

McD and Republicans: No Vision for the Future of Va.

I support the arts....I understand the economic crisis we face...and believe that unless Virginians and those elected to serve get a grip on the budget by minimally increasing taxes, Virginia will soon be at the bottom for education and for everything else. McD can try to attract all the business he wants, but people move companies and relocate families for more than low taxes. Generally they are savvy enough to recognize something that provides a better quality of life for their employees and families than low taxes.

That quality of life is being sucked away from Virginia..and again those further away from NoVa will suffer the most. Tourists can go into D.C. and visit top rated museums, excellent theater, and the National Symphony within a 30 minute drive...or a metro system that actually takes someone somewhere. There is a great zoo and national monuments that draw folks to Washington and their outlying suburbs. What does or will the rest of the state have to offer? Even the beaches aren't that great.

Government support is bad for the arts

Shakespeare did not require a subsidy from the government. He produced a quality product which appealed to his audience and was successful.

But what if he had relied on support from the King? Would his criticisms of the foibles and ambition of the elite been so biting? Would he have written for the customers of the Globe Theater or to flatter his patron?

The truth is likely that government support would have turned the Bard into just another hack.

If the arts are to be relevant and say something about who we are as a people, they must appeal to the people, who vote with their ticket purchases. If the arts cannot succeed in the marketplace, they must reevaluate what they are trying to say, and how they are saying it, not pander to the powerful and the elite for support for a message that misses its audience. If you have doubts, take a look at what some Chinese or Russian Revolutionary "Art."

But will we ever see Shakespeare today?

If the only arts that survive are the big ticket sellers, then prepare yourself for WWF, Rock and Country Music all the time.

Nothing wrong with those art forms, but it would be sad to never hear YoYo Ma, Beethoven's Ninth, Hamlet, The Barber of Seville and so forth, except, perhaps, at ticket prices only the very wealthy could afford.

But viewed through an economic lens (as you often do), if it isn't
profitable it is a waste of resources.

Sort of like some National Parks, I suppose.

History...

As a matter of fact, Shakespeare and others did have support from the rulers of the day.

Michelangelo had the support of the the Pope. Other artists had the support of wealthy patrons...who, I believe, were considered the important people and those with influence for their time. The DeMedici's supported da Vinci and other important painters and sculptors during the Renaissance... something lacking in Virginia.

The arts were used for communication and cave drawings give us insight into the lives of our ancestors hundreds of years ago, thousands of years ago.

Then their are other writers...like John Locke...whose prose cerainly influenced the politics of his day and ours.

Spare me this rubbish

But it wasn't government who pointed a spear at them and demanded they support it did they? The Pope was not government. The arts had wealthy patrons who gave money voluntarily and were not government agents of Julius Cesar.

The King's Men

Actually, Shakespeare did rely on money from the king, in fact he was the biggest backer of shakespeare's troupe. Hence it was called the King's Men.

TAX! TAX! TAX!

In my list of priorities of where my tax money should be going, funding an "artists" private passions is way down on my list. If an artist can say, "I'm an artist who paints. Tax payers should pay for my paint brushes." then it is reasonable to say, "I'm a fisherman who fishes. Tax payers should pay for my fishing poles." Or, "I am an artist who makes music. Tax payers should pay for my instruments." Well, "I am a hunter who hunts. Tax payers should pay for my guns." In this economy where funding is in short supply for law enforcement, education, national defense, public safety, and American families are forced to live on a tight budget, granting special entitlements to the arts just isn't on Maslov's Heirarchy of Needs' radar scope. However, if you are so wealthy as to be able to carry the burden of supporting the cost for entitlements for the arts, then by all means put your money where your mouth is and pay that tab. And while you're at it, buy me a fishing pole.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: Editorials rss feed    Opinion rss feed   


Toolbox


Partners