73°
forecast

Plans to alter history lessons spark outrage in N.C.

Posted to: Education News North Carolina

NORTH CAROLINA

North Carolina's education officials have confronted a firestorm of criticism about a proposal to teach only post-Reconstruction American history in high school, leaving lessons on the Founding Fathers and the Civil War to fifth- and seventh-grade classes.

Since Fox News aired a report about the proposed change earlier this month, the response on Web sites and blogs across the country has been swift and angry, including accusations that the state was trying to erase U.S. history and that it would lead to more dumbing down of students. They have also suggested a politically correct agenda was behind the move.

But state educators say the proposed change in curriculum standards addresses a need to teach U.S. history after 1877 more in-depth, and is not an attempt to thwart learning about the Constitution or the Emancipation Proclamation.

"There would be a deeper study of those major events," said Rebecca Garland, chief academic officer for the state Department of Public Instruction. "It was not to leave history out, but to put it in smaller time chunks to make it more manageable."

"There was never any intent to leave out any of the critical events that changed the history of this country," Garland said.

The state is in the process of updating all its curriculum standards - math and science are already done - and had just started working on history, Garland said.

"This is not what the majority of North Carolinians or Americans want from their government, whose brave ancestors fought to gain and preserve our precious freedom," Moyock Realtor Toni Tabb wrote in a letter to the Currituck County School Board. "We must stand against these attacks on liberty."

Garland said she has received at least 1,000 e-mails, and there have been many more calls and e-mails to others in the department. As it is now, U.S. History is typically taught in 11th grade and starts at 1789 - two years after the Constitution was signed, six years after the Revolutionary War ended, and 12 years after the Declaration of Independence was adopted.

Colonial history, including pertinent Outer Banks history about the 1584- 87 Roanoke Voyages, the Lost Colony and the Freedmen's Colony, is taught in fif th and seven th grades.

But David Oaksmith, chairman of Dare County Board of Education, said that older students are better equipped to understand and critique the contributions of the founders and Abraham Lincoln to the nation, as well as the importance of early colonial exploration.

"To leave that out at the 11th-grade level is a mistake," he said. "If you're going to teach U.S. history, start it at the beginning."

Part of the proposed change includes concentrating on U.S. history in fif th grade, and eliminating the current lessons on Mexico, Canada and Central America. And in seven th grade, the current focus on North Carolina history would broaden to U.S. history. Civics class in 10th grade would also focus on democracy and the U.S. government, including the Constitution.

State Sen. Marc Basnight, a Manteo Democrat and Senate leader, wrote in a Feb. 12 letter to the department that he is opposed to limits on the periods studied. If anything, he said, history coursework should be doubled or tripled.

"Any changes the state makes to teaching U.S. History," the senator said, "must be an enhancement to what students learn in high school and not downshifting in any way."

Department spokeswoman Linda Fuller said that an idea that would maintain the entire U.S. history curriculum but split it into two courses - supported by many educators and members of the public - will be considered in revisions of the curriculum. That also would alleviate concerns about some students who move into the state missing out on learning American history in lower grades.

The comment period on the first draft has been extended to March 2, she said, and the input will be taken into account in additional drafts. A proposal is expected to be presented to the state school board by the fall, with the final version implemented in 2013.

Catherine Kozak, (252) 441-1711, cate.kozak@pilotonline.com

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

Teaching US history

Well DAFIRE makes a better example than he thinks, and must have graduated from the NC school system.

In studying Thomas Jefferson, in other states we also read the original draft of the Declaration of Independence in which Thomas Jefferson penned a damning condemnation of the institute of slavery calling for it's abolishment. The lengthy section was edited out at the convention primarily in compromises with the states of S. Carolina and Georgia, without which they would not have signed.

Why don't you Google "original draft declaration of independence" and read it for yourself?

You are a perfect example of WHY this time period needs more in depth study and without the political correctness.

Teaching U.S.History

I wonder if the people who want to spend so much time teaching our youth about the "Founding Fathers" desire to teach the entire history or just a select history. For example, when teaching about Thomas Jefferson's contribution to drafting the Declaration of Independence, do we also teach that he was a supporter and participant in an institution called Slavery? Do we spend time analyzing the inconsistencies between what Jefferson wrote concerning life and liberty and what he practiced? If we are teaching a perverted history that does not fully teach what this Country was about in the 1700s and 1800s, then what is all the fuss about?

More history, same amount of time

In 1976 when I was learning American history, we had 200 years of history to learn, 4 years of high school. Today we have 234 years and growing to teach and same amount of time. That is 15% more history, and encompasses several wars and major events that the kids need to know about. In 1976 we were rushing to get up to WWII and we were glossing over much of the history in the 20th century to get there. We can't have the kids glossing over the 20th century, it had a huge impact on our world and quite frankly, is far more pertinent to creating informed citizens. The level of detail that used to be taught in pre-civil war history isn't required anymore. The big concepts and ideas that shaped events yes, but not the nitty gritty.

aw poor babies!

Every country in Europe teaches history from day 1 not 1600. Perhaps we should adapt the school year most other countries have and cut Summer break to 6 weeks so they can learn more.

Why not change a boring subject?

Is it really a crime to break history down into digestable chunks for our students? My sons complain that the schools rehash the same stuff year after year. Is it really important to hear about the Louisiana Purchase 7 years in a row? It is mind numbing and does not encourage our students to think past the surface of the subject. Why not spend some extra time on various periods of our history? As the student grows, the cirriculum grows with them and encourages them to delve into the "why" rather than simply the "who and when". You cannot accomplish this by skimming the surface year after year. I applaud educators for attempting to breathe life into such a stale subject. Maybe our students will start getting excited about our history. What better way to do it than changing the syllabus?

History Lessons

This controversy will be worthwhile if it sparks genuine interest in what is going on in American public schools. It is not WHEN we teach history, but WHAT we teach, and HOW WELL we teach history lessons. Furthermore, history can be taught in several ways. It can be incorporated in English classes (literature and writing) as well as in formal history classes. One problem we have is compartmentalizing education. Do we teach economics? Certainly we can incorporate history and economics with math, making all a little more relevant. Relevance is an issue. I've taught school at the middle school and high school levels. I assure you that we lose many students because the material we use as text books are mush. They don't mean a thing to the kids. The teacher's challenge is to make education relevant and interesting. Doing so can be done, but we have gone so far in "standardization" that motivation and creativity are readily stripped from both educators and students. We want our young people to have basics and to be able to think critically as well as to pass state mandated tests. We want them to appreciate what they can achieve.

Those who ignore history...

are doomed to repeat it.....

Bobjones No, the NATION is

Bobjones
No, the NATION is not "greedy, white capitalists who are guilty of many crimes and who currently are destroying the planet for their own personal gain" but those running it are, whether in corporate CEO chairs or congressional ones,thought that line is blurred daily. Capitalism and free markets have been perverted by these unchristian moneychangers.
I sincerely wish that some of the fervor FOX manufactures for these distractions would be turned instead toward holding to account these leaders so that the NATION can continue as designed. By,For and Of the People.

Actually, the nation is

Actually, the nation is being run by a black, self-centered socialist out for his own political gain. So you are right; hold THESE so called leaders accountable, not just the ones you want censured.

man without a plan

Your user ID says it all.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: Education rss feed    News rss feed   



Toolbox