73°
forecast

Virginia House shoots down pleas to 'save' arts

Posted to: News State Government Virginia

RICHMOND

Even as hundreds of arts supporters wearing "Save the Arts" stickers descended on the Capitol, the House of Delegates passed a version of the state budget on Thursday that would eliminate the state arts commission.

Advocates packed the House gallery and lined the halls and staircases to urge lawmakers to preserve the Virginia Commission for the Arts. Del. Jenn McClellan, D-Richmond, welcomed the visitors, but no discussion of arts funding took place before the 61-38 vote.

If the commission gets killed in the final 2010- 12 budget in mid-March, and arts groups get no state money starting in mid-2011, "it would change who we are," said Luci Cochran, executive director of the Peninsula Fine Arts Center of Newport News, who was among the arts advocates. Her group received $55,130 this year from the commission.

"For the last year or so," Cochran said, "we've looked at 'What can we trim?' over and over again. There is no fat. And with these times, economically, the private sector cannot make up the difference."

The center would probably have to cut a position and cancel exhibitions or programs, altering its mission, she said.

John Dixon, director of the Academy of Music in Norfolk, visited the offices of 67 delegates Thursday, he said. For his group, which provides music classes, scholarships for low-income children are at stake.

Dixon said the loss of state arts funding "could lead to the closing of a number of valuable organizations. It could lead to further burdens on the state's unemployment resources, to reduced revenue flows to Richmond from ticket sales and hotel rooms and income tax."

At the General Assembly, "secretaries told me they had been getting lots of phone calls and e-mails" pleading to save the arts commission, he said.

Though the House budget package is thick with items, the arts commission, which received $4.4 million this year for grants to 700 groups, was among the standout issues in the halls of the General Assembly, Dixon said.

Outside the Capitol, some arts advocates held up signs. Among them was Matt Polson. A teacher at The School of the Performing Arts in the Richmond Community, Polson said that if the commission is eliminated, "I and about 50 percent of my friends will be out of a job."

As word spread, Hampton Roads arts leaders assessed how they would manage without the state grants.

"It's pretty scary," said Katie Stone, general manager of the Hurrah Players, a Norfolk-based family theater that offers performing-arts classes. The loss of state money would mean fewer, if any, scholarships for its gifted, underprivileged students. Her group got $28,645 from the commission this year, and most of it went to scholarships.

The Chrysler Museum of Art in Norfolk got nearly $100,000 this year. Without that grant, something would have to go, director Bill Hennessey said. "It's exhibitions, it's programs or it's people."

House Appropriations Committee members proposed to cut the commission's budget in half next year and eliminate it entirely by July 1, 2011, because, in this lean year, they did not deem the arts a core service of government, Del. Chris Jones, R-Suffolk, said this week.

Hennessey took a different view.

"Well, what is the core of what the government should do? Is it a government function to encourage tourism or economic development or education?" he said, adding that arts and culture are integral to all three.

"And if the government has some role in supporting jobs, there are a lot of people who work in jobs supported by that $4.4 million," Hennessey said.

"The arts are willing to take a hit like everybody else," he said, a sentiment voiced by many arts managers who want the cut to be proportionate to losses other agencies will endure.

The House and Senate will vote on each other's versions of the budget, then a bipartisan conference committee will hash out a final recommended budget. The full legislature will vote on that budget before the session ends on March 13.

Until that vote, Hennessey said, "we will continue trying to help people understand what a terrible idea this is."

Pilot writer Bill Sizemore contributed to this report.

Teresa Annas, (757) 446-2485, teresa.annas@pilotonline.com

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

Support Our Infrastructure

The modest support Virginia offers for arts infrastructure is threatened with elimination. If the House has its way with the budget, the Commonwealth will be the only state in the union without an arts commission. This funding does not largely go to support artists as many uninformed comments seem to indicate. Artists still must compete in the free market, which this author fully supports. The funding supports the infrastructure necessary to maintain access to the arts much as the funding allocated for maintenance of highways or education supports the free market. While the Constitution of neither the nation nor the Commonwealth mentions a word about funding road construction, nor the arts, nor education, nor any of the many varied services that mainstream citizens have become accustomed to and support, most understand that maintaining a civilization requires the maintenance of common infrastructure to support access to the markets for commerce, education, and the arts. Without this common infrastructure, there is no free market. Please contact your Senators and support them in the fight to maintain this infrastructure!

Arts Are Not Going Away

Should I be forced to pay for a major league ball team? Or a Nascar venue? Should you? Of course not..the arts are the same thing. They are nice, but not necessary, and certainly not something the taxpayers should pay for...

From our esteemed developer

"The Governor and Legislature could have supported a temporary increase in the income tax to be rescinded as soon as recovery was reflected in state revenues. But that simply was put off the table by anti tax sentiment, so the the job losses and the fiscal impact of that stingy decision will begin immediately."
Excuse me while I throw up. In other words temporarily permanent. If such a scheme were to be put in place it would never be recinded. There would never be such a recovery because there would never be enough money to satisfy the George Soros tax and spend gimme weenies. The arts commission should run like a Seven Eleven. If you have a product that is worth the price, then people will buy it. Taxpayers don't subsidize Seven Eleven, nor should they subsidize art. Axe it and be done with it. You want to support the arts Mike, then stroke a check on behalf of us "stingy" taxpayers.

Writers and artists have

Writers and artists have often been in the political mix, adding to an awareness and insight into politics.

Michelangelo had the support of the the Pope. Other artists had the support of wealthy patrons...who were considered the politically connected for their time. The DeMedici's supported da Vinci and other important painters and sculptors during the Renaissance... something lacking in Virginia.

The arts have always been used as a means for communication and cave drawings give us insight into the lives of our ancestors thousands of years ago.

Then their are other writers...like John Locke...whose prose certainly influenced the politics of his day and ours. Or John Dewey. Even Machievelli, who wrote about the sins of bureaucracies, would have been cut-off had he lived in Virginia.

What I don't get . . .

I love art. When I go to free days at the Chrysler, etc., I leave money in the jar. But what I don't get is asking for all cuts to be proportional. It seems ludicrous to cut school lunches and art funding by the same percentage. The kids gotta be nourished properly to enjoy art, ya know!

more guns, more Jesus

The only thing McDonnell and the righties care about are more guns and more Jesus.

How much do you love art?

Because your comment doesn't sound particularly cultured nor educated . . .

Set up your own 501(c)(3) for the arts...

...rather than take taxpayer's money out of their pockets to fund them. Then people who want can make a charitable contribution. There are a lot of arts supporters, many very wealthy. Let them carry the load through their charitable donations.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: News rss feed    State Government rss feed   


Toolbox


Partners