The Virginian-Pilot
©
RICHMOND
Several House Democrats joined their committee colleagues on the other side of the aisle Monday to approve Republican Gov. Bob McDonnell's charter schools bill.
McDonnell's signature education reform package could get similar bipartisan support from the heavily Democratic Senate on Thursday.
Robley Jones, a lobbyist with the Virginia Education Association, said he expects the measure to pass the Senate Education committee.
Both bills are aimed at encouraging more charter schools in Virginia. Proponents said they would help the state qualify for federal stimulus money aimed at education innovation and improvement of low-performing schools.
The VEA, along with other educator-advocacy groups, worked with McDonnell's staff and legislators on compromise language and now supports the bill.
Under HB1390, which passed a House committee by a 17-5 vote Monday, charter schools would first submit their applications to the State Board of Education for review and guidance. The S tate B oard would then recommend to the local school boards whether to approve an application. The localities make the final decision. McDonnell initially wanted the State Board to decide a possible charter school's fate.
"This is modest reform," Del. Steven Landes, R-Augusta, said.
Charter advocacy groups have repeatedly ranked Virginia's charter school law as too prohibitive, and the state currently has only three charter schools, with a fourth set to open. McDonnell has said he wants to open up the state to more charters, and his new education secretary is a charter school founder.
"At the end of the day, this bill provides expertise," Del. Joseph Morrissey, D-Richmond, said. "I don't think we've heard a scintilla of evidence that this would harm public schools."
But the bill still met opposition from members of the Legislative Black Caucus, who all voted against the measure in committee. They argued that when the House budget proposal makes steep cuts in education, Virginia should not be expanding the number of schools that can qualify for limited money.
While these bills are modest, Del. Kenny Alexander, D-Norfolk and chairman of the caucus, said McDonnell eventually wants more charters, which will be problematic.
However, Del. Rosalyn Dance, D-Petersburg and a member of the caucus, remained a chief co-sponsor of the House bill.
Under Virginia's "Race to the Top" application for $350 million in stimulus money, the state sets aside money for divisions to open charters as a solution to low-performing schools. Seven divisions - none in Hampton Roads - could qualify for $2 million a year for four years to start up and run charter schools.
But divisions don't have to use that money, and there are other resources available for divisions that want to turn around low-performing schools, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Patricia Wright said.
Deirdre Fernandes, (757) 222-5121, deirdre.fernandes@pilotonline.com

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo

Selective use of state vs. local control
It is interesting to note that McDonnell's original approach was for the state to approve charter school applications rather than local school boards. The final bill retains local approval but with a state endorsement or recommendation on the application. McDonnell's selective use of state control vs. local control is somewhat hypocritical. Now having said that, a lot of federal money depends upon expanding charter schools within a state and the overall objectives make sense. I have no problem with the state encouraging charter school expansion as long as all children have access to the schools and selective enrollment does not exclude at risk children. As evidenced by his budget proposal, McDonnell has never been a supporter of public education. This charter school legislation needs to be folloowed closely to ensure equal access for all children.
Why Should Local School Boards Have Final Approval?
Allowing local school boards to control this process seems like allowing the Fox to guard the hen house.
It is time
It is time that a child's right to a decent education is valued over a teacher's right to a guaranteed job or a bureaucracy's right to keep wasting taxpayer funds on waste, fraud, and administrative cover-up.