The Virginian-Pilot
©
NORFOLK
James Parker cringes when he thinks about cuts to Medicaid insurance that could make it even harder to get the medical care he needs.
The 54-year-old Norfolk resident has multiple sclerosis and receives primary care at a community health clinic. When he needs a specialist, however, it’s a fight to find a doctor who will see him.
He’s one of more than 775,000 Virginians covered by Medicaid, a shared state and federal insurance program for the disabled and people with low incomes.
The ailing economy is putting the program under unprecedented pressure for two reasons: More people are qualifying for the insurance because they’re losing jobs or earning less; and state legislators facing budget shortfalls are looking for ways to cut Medicaid expenses by curtailing services or reducing reimbursements to health-care providers.
The Medicaid program already pays doctors and hospitals much less than private insurance does – below actual costs in most cases. Many doctors, therefore, do not accept Medicaid patients or restrict their practices to a certain number.
In Virginia, both the House and Senate budget proposals included cuts in reimbursements to hospitals and doctors, though they differ in how much. Legislators, who will take up the issue of the budget again today , hope federal funding will come through to help make up for some of the proposed Medicaid reductions.
Cuts also are being considered for FAMIS, the state’s health insurance program for low-income children and pregnant women. Reductions in health care for low-income populations are likely to have ripple effects.
Parker’s physician, Dr. Subir Vij, would deal with them firsthand. “We’re already seeing more people with Medicaid and more people who are uninsured,” said Vij, an internal medicine doctor who practices at Park Place Medical Center in Norfolk. “They had a nice job with insurance, but then they lost their job, and their doctors kicked them out.”
About 25 percent of patients who visit the community health center are on Medicaid, a higher rate than at a typical family practice. An additional 40 percent are uninsured. Community clinics are federally funded and do not turn away Medicaid patients.
Still, growth and possible reimbursement cuts could translate into longer waits.
Two years ago, for instance, it took about two weeks for a new patient to get an appointment. Now it can take six weeks. In 2009, the number of patient visits at Park Place and its partner center, Portsmouth Community Health Clinic, was 38 percent higher than the previous year.
Many Medicaid patients arrive after being turned down by other doctors.
The same trend is unfolding across the nation as the number of people on Medicaid grows.
A survey released last month by the Kaiser Family Foundation found a record one-year increase – 3.3 million patients – in Medicaid enrollment from June 2008 to June 2009. Virginia’s growth was 8.2 percent, higher than the national average of 7.5 percent. Nearby Maryland saw a 20 percent jump, the highest in the nation.
Because Medicaid enrollment often lags behind a rise in unemployment, an even bigger increase could occur this year, according to the analysis.
Virginia legislators had proposed Medicaid reimbursement cuts to hospitals last year, but federal stimulus money helped fill the gap. Portsmouth Community Health Clinic also received about $219,000 in stimulus money last year, which allowed for the hiring of another doctor and support staff.
That stimulus assistance is due to expire at the end of December. Although Congress and the White House are considering extending the payments for six more months, they haven’t done so yet, leaving legislators across the country struggling to make their budget numbers work.
In the Kaiser survey, every state’s Medicaid enrollment rose, and in 32 states, including Virginia, enrollment grew twice as fast as the year before.
Virginia already ranks 48th in the country in Medicaid expenditures per capita, according to a 2008 Joint Legislative Audit and Review Commission fact sheet. And every dollar cut from state Medicaid results in a loss of at least that much in federal matching money.
Barbara Willis, chief executive officer of the community health clinics in Portsmouth and Norfolk, worries that doctors will be even more hesitant to take on Medicaid patients if reimbursements decline any further. Then more people would turn to community health centers, increasing wait times, or go without care until they were so sick they needed to go to emergency rooms.
Parker, like many patients, can find primary care at community health clinics, but he sometimes has a harder time with specialty care. He needs to see a urologist, but the practice he was referred to several months ago was not taking any more Medicaid patients. “I’m still looking for someone,” he said.
Willis said some practices cap how many Medicaid patients they’ll take, and patients who call after the limit has been reached are turned away.
Some doctors cannot, or will not, turn away Medicaid patients.
For instance, pediatric specialists who work for Children’s Specialty Group base their practices at Children’s Hospital of The King’s Daughters, where about half the patient visits are paid for by Medicaid. Children are more likely to be eligible for Medicaid than adults, so that’s where most of the growth in enrollment is occurring.
Frank Singleton, CEO of the specialty group, said the doctors will not turn away Medicaid patients, which means a reimbursement cut would hit them harder than pediatricians or family practice doctors who choose to restrict their practices.
Emergency room physicians also would bear the brunt of lower reimbursements.
Gwen Harry, executive director of the Virginia College of Emergency Physicians, said that specialty is legally bound to care for whoever comes into the emergency room. Further, more people unable to find a doctor who will take Medicaid might wait until they are sick enough to end up in the ER.
“That ends up impacting not just the Medicaid patients,” Harry said, “but everyone else who needs care there.”
Elizabeth Simpson, (757) 446-2635, elizabeth.simpson@pilotonline.com

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo
Good place to write this . . .
Veterans (all who served, not just retirees) should *all* send their military medical records to the VA to be scrutinized for conditions that started on active duty. Those can produce a rating and a monthly check, or at least the medications related to that condition can be obtained for free at the VA. Show them your records, folks. You would be surprised what is covered, and rightly so. You give the military the best years of your life. And they agree to cover you for conditions incurred in your service (even if not directly related to your work--if it starts while you're on active duty, it is covered).
Good place to write this . . .
Veterans (all who served, not just retirees) should *all* send their military medical records to the VA to be scrutinized for conditions that started on active duty. Those can produce a rating and a monthly check, or at least the medications related to that condition can be obtained for free at the VA. Show them your records, folks. You would be surprised what is covered, and rightly so. You give the military the best years of your life. And they agree to cover you for conditions incurred in your service (even if not directly related to your work--if it starts while you're on active duty, it is covered).
blah blah blah
rant all you want, you will never convince us that your health care is our responsibility
my responsibility is to my family, not to some low life who dropped out of school and had children they couldn't support in pursuit of section 8, welfare dollars, and that Utopian idea that every good socialist has always believed in but that has never existed
Fact check
But here's the picture we often miss: 48 million adults went without health insurance in 2005 -- and 67 percent of them are in households in which at least one family member is working full-time, according to a study conducted by the Commonwealth Fund, a foundation that researches health-care issues. More than 9 million of these working adults make more than $35,000 a year -- yet they can't afford or don't qualify for coverage. More and more, they're people just like you.
Families Without Health Insurance
By Melinda Marshall, Parenting
Okay, I'll try again. Obama
Okay, I'll try again. Obama care budget estimates rely on decreases in medicare/medicaid funding. If you think it's bad now wait until this so called health reform bill passes. Do you all know that states such as Massachusetts and Florida have struck sweetheart deals and will get millions that VA will not to offset the proposed reductions in medicaid and medicare? Medicare and medicaid that's where the supposed savings in the health reform bill are from. This poor man may also be subject to the health review panel and loose care completely. It could happen.
And where do the savings
And where do the savings come from in Obama's health care plan? You guessed it, medicare and medicaid. Our govt. run health care program known as medicaid and medicare deny coverage way more frequently than private insurance companies. Why? Why not? You can't sue the govt.
Abuse
It’s truly sad to see someone in Mr. Parker’s condition unable to receive help. I know of several people whom abuse the Medicaid system for their drug problems. They see multiple doctors for prescriptions of narcotic drugs and then sell same for the money for crack. Medicaid employee’s could quickly find these people by just scanning records for this abuse. These same people choose to remain unemployed so the free help won’t stop. I have taken several to the doctor’s office’s and before the engine is cut off they are back out the door with prescription in hand. When that avenue has been played for the month, it’s on to the Emergency Room for the same thing. Cut the drug’s and cut the cost. These are the people needing the free clinic.
Priorities
Its all about priorities.
There is no need for a nation has great as the United States to not have adequate funding for programs which benefit our citizens and society as a whole, such as medicaid, medicare, education, or even universal health care for that matter.
The United States is too good a nation and too wealthy to not do these things. The problem is not and has never been a lack of money. The problem is a lack of will to reign in the inflated defense budget and to curtail the military industrial complex and the weapons manufacturers.
The U.S. defense budget is greater than Russia, China, and about a dozen other countries combined give or take a few billion. It is absurd. We have spent billions of dollars in Iraq and Afghanistan but can not find the money to take care of ourselves. It is a travesty but a clear indicator of the priorities of the wealth oligarchy which owns and controls this nation and our money.
If Medicaid is going broke?
Medicaid has been "broke" for some time. Where the article stated that Medicaid doesn't reimburse the cost of care, they don't mean cost plus the markup to make a profit, they mean the actual calculated cost of opening the doors to the business. I would venture to say that one of the reasons we have skyrocketing costs in healthcare is everyone else has to cover the costs the govt won't pay. What you are reading about longer wait times and limited access to specialty care will become the norm with the current proposals congress and Obama are suggesting. Quite frankly, it scares me to death.
There are solutions if they're thought through
The government needs to look at this from the supply side and not the demand side. I'm talking about the physicians. There's no reason to dispense with the 3000+ community health clinics (CHC) across this country. Promote the use of more physicians assistants supervised by doctors - they can do many tasks that doctors do and don't have the huge tuition expenses to pay back to med school and the lengthy years long qualification timeline. Provide tuition reimbursements or education grants for doctors/physciains in CHCs. Provide limited liability protections for the CHCs so the malpractice insurance premiums stay low.
Dispense with treatment programs for substance abuse, scooters, smoking cessation programs and other expenses which eat into the cost of public health care. Let other charities and cessation programs handle that. It should be basic health care.
You would have a two tiered blend of public and private health care to cover folks. Some would get better care than others-no denying that, but do we really need expensive high tech CT and MRI scans when an Xrays and good medical screening are cheaper and just as reliable.