74°
forecast

Hold it: Group opposes restrooms at Corolla beach

Posted to: News North Carolina

CURRITUCK COUNTY, N.C.

Currituck Beach Lighthouse owners have taken on an old adversary by opposing Currituck County's plans to build public restrooms at a nearby ocean access.

In 2006, Currituck County and the Outer Banks Conservationists settled a five-year dispute over the historic beacon that drew national attention, reached top levels of the federal government, and cost thousands of dollars in legal fees.

This time, state highway and wildlife agencies could get involved.

Currituck County plans to build public restrooms along Corolla Village Road on the ocean side of N.C. 12 in Corolla. The road serves as a beach access for hundreds of tourists each year.

Locals have complained that many visitors relieve themselves behind the dunes or in the bushes around nearby beach homes.

Families with children on the beach would have to cross busy N.C. 12 to get to existing restrooms more than a quarter-mile away, said Currituck Commissioner Paul O'Neal.

"They're not going to do that," he said. "Don't the people of Currituck County deserve a nice beach access with restrooms and a shower facility?"

But John Wilson, founder of Outer Banks Conservationists, opposes the project. The land there has been protected and was intended to be left undisturbed, he said in a January letter to group members.

Wilson could not be reached for comment at the group's offices in Manteo. A person who answered the phone would not comment. Wilson's home number is not listed.

Currituck has tried to build restrooms there before and been denied, Wilson said in the letter. "But once again they seem intent on destroying the historical integrity of the light station."

The North Carolina Department of Transportation owns the right-of-way area along Corolla Village Road that also runs past the lighthouse on the west side of N.C. 12.

Beyond the right of way, the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission owns a narrow strip that runs from the ocean to the sound on both sides of N.C. 12.

Currituck has asked the commission for permission to build restrooms there.

The Wildlife Resources Commission has approved the restrooms in concept, but the project still needs review by other boards, including the North Carolina Historical Commission, said Gordon Myers, executive director of the wildlife commission.

A decision is expected within two months, he said.

From 2001 to 2006, Currituck County spent nearly $100,000 in legal fees battling Outer Banks Conservationists over ownership of the lighthouse and in later attempts to enforce local restroom and parking ordinances.

After the federal government awarded the Outer Banks group the lighthouse, the county sued the nonprofit and the state to require adequate parking, restrooms and a permit to run a gift shop.

Existing restrooms sit not far from the lighthouse but are county-owned. A judge ruled the federal government still had a strong interest in the lighthouse and said the county could not enforce the local ordinances.

In 2006, the two sides reached a settlement in which the county would get 17 percent of the annual proceeds from lighthouse tickets to go toward maintaining parking and restrooms.

The lighthouse and the nearby county-owned Whalehead Club historic site are part of Currituck Heritage Park.

Outer Banks Conservationists opened the 135-year-old lighthouse for tours in 1991 after years of raising money and getting grants to clean up the complex, which includes renovated keepers quarters.

About 85,000 people climb the beacon each year.

Jeff Hampton, (252) 338-0159, jeff.hampton@pilotonline.com

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

Another agenda first, facts second report

As usual with Mr. Hampton, there's a lot more to this story than Mr. Hampton would have us believe. Mr. Wilson has a long history of preserving heritage on the Outer Banks--much, much longer than Currituck government. While there are several good arguments on both sides of this issue, a core piece of this issue regards the county's desire to build restrooms on private property. Sure, it's a tourism issue. It's also a property rights issue. Of important note, the lighthouse does not belong to the county and the county spends nothing to maintain it.

Mr. Hampton's selfish myopia continues to render a less than full accounting of the issue, and as a result fails to either educate or inform.

Mr. O'Neal, in his comments regarding a nice facility, plays on a common notion--sure, everyone deserves a clean restroom. However, Mr. O'Neal also proposes in that same comment to take the land for that restroom from an extremely dedicated preserver of our local heritage--hence those long legal battles that Currituck, once again of note, didn't win. It would seem Mr. O'Neals emotions trump his judgment.

In short, there's a lot of important issues here at work that Mr. Hampton finds

Correction

The word "their" should have been "there". Now I feel all better! :)

Public restrooms

If you have public beaches then their should be access to public restrooms. This is really a no-brainer and I'm suprised that anyone would oppose the idea unless they don't want people on the beach anyway. This is probably the reason. Too bad.

Build the restrooms.

You can't have your cake and

You can't have your cake and eat it too.

Doesn't anyone just pee in

Doesn't anyone just pee in the ocean anymore?

buy some pampers or depends!

We don't need more restrooms, plenty of them around. As they say, take a hike.

easy for you to say

I live on the ocean side of Atlantic Ave. in VB and beach users are constantly relieving themselves (#s 1 AND 2) in residents yards. I wonder if any of the resistance group members have people going #2 in their yard.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: News rss feed   


Toolbox