73°
forecast

Judge: Grant immunity to witnesses for accused Navy SEALs

Posted to: Iraq Military News Norfolk

NORFOLK

The case against a Navy SEAL accused of not protecting an alleged Iraqi terrorist took a major turn Friday when a military judge ordered that five key defense witnesses be granted immunity to testify on his behalf. If not, he warned, the case will be halted.

Petty Officer 1st Class Julio Huertas is one of three SEALs accused in the controversial case, which has led to protests and calls from members of Congress for the charges to be dropped.

Huertas faces court-martial on charges of dereliction of duty, impeding an investigation and making a false

official statement. A member of SEAL Team 10 at Joint Expeditionary Base Little Creek, he was one of the commandos who captured Ahmed Hashim Abed in Fallujah in early September. A sailor guarding the detainee in the hours after his capture claimed to see one SEAL punch Abed while Huertas and a third SEAL watched.

Four other SEALs, including the detachment commander, and a Navy corpsman who were present on the day of the alleged incident dispute the guard's claims. But weeks into the investigation, they were told they, too, could face prosecution. As a result, the five hired a lawyer and requested immunity before testifying in the three cases that have gone forward.

In February, without giving a reason, Army Maj. Gen. C.T. Cleveland, the head of Special Operations Command Central, denied those requests.

The military judge hearing the case against Huertas, Cmdr. Tierney Carlos, said Friday he didn't understand that decision.

According to court documents, Carlos said, the five witnesses' testimony would shed doubt on the guard's allegations. Not granting them immunity, he ruled, is either an attempt to gain tactical advantage over the defense or evidence the government is overreaching.

Just as important, Carlos noted, is that the expected testimony would be exculpatory. Documents the men submitted about what happened between 5 and 8 a.m. the day after Abed's capture make clear that the guard was occasionally left alone with the detainee, Carlos said.

He also said that the detachment commander noticed blood on the detainee's shirt, and asked the guard what had happened. According to documents, Carlos said, the guard responded, "I don't know." Asked who was in the holding cell with Abed, the guard answered, "A lot of guys were in there." Did anyone do anything to Abed? "No. I don't know," the guard answered.

The five men's refusal to testify under their Fifth Amendment right doesn't mean they have anything to hide. Citing Supreme Court rulings, Carlos noted that one of the Fifth Amendment's basic functions "is to protect innocent men... 'who otherwise might be ensnared by ambiguous circumstances.' "

Carlos gave Cleveland until March 24 to provide immunity to the witnesses. If that doesn't happen, Huertas' court-martial will be abated - a legal term for postponing it indefinitely.

This is the second time Carlos has made a significant ruling in the defense's favor. In January, after the government indicated it would not bring Abed to the United States to testify in the court-martial, Carlos moved the trial to Baghdad, saying Huertas deserves to face his accuser.

His court-martial is set for April 22. Carlos also is presiding over the case against Petty Officer 2nd Class Jonathan Keefe, a SEAL accused of dereliction of duty. That trial, also in Iraq, will follow Huertas' court-martial.

The SEAL accused of punching Abed, Petty Officer 2nd Class Matthew McCabe, faces trial in Norfolk in May. A different judge is overseeing that case.

Monica Lombardi, Huertas' civilian defense counsel, said her client was very pleased with the ruling.

She said she was glad that Carlos "picked up on the fact that these witnesses... place the government's 'star witness' alone with the detainee."

Perhaps the guard punched Abed, or the detainee, who is accused of masterminding the murder of four Blackwater contractors in 2004, injured himself when he was briefly left alone.

"It doesn't really matter," Lombardi said. "The point is Petty Officer Huertas was not in on any sort of abuse of the detainee."

Kate Wiltrout, (757) 446-2629, kate.wiltrout@pilotonline.com

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

Fair play?

I wonder how many of these people who post comments saying that these seals did wrong ever been in a war situation or even a highly intense situation. Things happen in the heat of the situation. Right or wrong it happens. We are human and sometimes our emotions get the better of us. I say let he who has not sinned cast the 1st stone. I bet sometime in their life their emotions got the better of them. Exspecially at a younger age. When we get olderwe obtain more wisdom through experience. I know from these experiences, emotion and the tension of the situation makes people act certain ways. Does this case warrant ruining young military careers? If it does then there are quite alot of people in power that should not be there. If one thinks that this world runs the way it does through being rightious, then they are nieve. I see on tv/news reports about all the injustices in this world yet there is no call to arms about those. Please, dont confuse your morals with others.You may think its wrong to hi some one back after getting punched in the face but to some one else a proper response to to hit the person back.

Doesn't matter a bit...

In the grand, glorious, and cosmic scheme of things, none of the previous 20 comments amounts to a hill of beans. Nobody gives a rats patooties what any of you think, because all of this legal maneuvering is for political show, not to establish some noble point of military law, or to establish some brand-new military tactic or strategy. One of the posters here had the right perspective--these SEALS are strong, tough warriors. But they are little more than tools, being used in a larger end-game designed to play out the political ideology of the blue suits in Washington. If it suits the 'blue suits', then the SEALS will ultimately be found innocent. But (as I suspect) if they are somehow found to be culpable (since SEALS don't fit into the current, politically-correct climate)they will be excorciated, pilloried by the liberal press, and jailed or discharged with a BCD. It's a game, folks--and we ALL are being played for the fools...

hhmmm

I bet a certain government witness has a big pile of oil soaked soggy money for this set up.

Dear God

It amazes me as soon as we capture one of the enemy we immediately "lawyer them up." I thought I would never see the day when our military men and women would be put on trial for alleged crimes against the enemy, especially giving a known murdering terrorist a fat lip. I pray that God has his hands on these navy hero's and that justice will be served. Those in government today should be ashamed of themselves. If they're so darn brave why don't they take a vacation with their families and walk down the streets of Baghdad or Kabul...I didn't think so!

Accuser? & Walk a Mile in Their Boots

"...Huertas deserves to face his accuser."
Isn't the accuser the sailor who "claimed to see one SEAL punch Abed while Huertas and a third SEAL watched."
Why isn't HE (the unnamed sailor) being named?
And what ARE all the facts? Did another prisoner hit Abed? Was Abed spitting on our sailors, throwing feces at them, screaming slurs? Did one of our sailors hit Abed? We were not there and we do NOT know all the facts, so let us not pass judgement until we have walked a mile in our sailors boots.

you are already passing

you are already passing judgement. Reread your post. Sheesh!

Major General

The Major General that denied the request for immunity undoubtedly had directions that probably came from the White House.

Your right!

It was Bush and the Neocons that lead us into this war.

Retention.

With $16k bonus and the orders I wanted I walked after Beirut seeing the writing on the wall. I feel for all our men and women in the Armed forces who face death with warped ROE's, their hands tied and PC baloney hindering the task at hand and jeopordizing their lives.

We don't need soldiers like

We don't need soldiers like you. We're better off with you in the private sector.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: Iraq rss feed    Military rss feed    News rss feed   



Toolbox


 

special features