The Virginian-Pilot
©
RICHMOND
In a tough budget year, state Sen. Mary Margaret Whipple thought she had found a way to plug a tax loophole and claim an estimated $33 million in annual revenue for Virginia and its hard-pressed localities.
Her legislation was breezing toward passage until the beneficiaries of the loophole got wind of it and mounted a last-minute lobbying blitz. Within days, the bill was history.
The episode is instructive as a small lesson in how things work in the General Assembly. The moral of the story: Money talks. And lobbying works.
Whipple's legislation was directed at online hotel booking companies such as Orbitz and Expedia.com, which book rooms at discounted rates and resell them on the Web. They now pay retail sales and hotel occupancy taxes only on the discounted price they pay the hotel - not on what they charge the customer.
That's not fair, Whipple reasoned: A customer who books a room directly with the hotel pays tax on the full retail rate. So the Arlington County Democrat introduced a bill, SB452, requiring that the tax be computed on the full price of the room. The measure would also mandate that the tax be clearly delineated on the customer's invoice.
The bill was approved by the Senate, 40-0, and a House of Delegates subcommittee, 10-0, advancing it to the full House Finance Committee.
That's when it hit the radar of the Interactive Travel Services Association, the online booking companies' trade group. The association hired Benson Dendy, a veteran Richmond lobbyist, and Dendy started working the phones.
That was on a Friday afternoon. The following Monday morning, industry representatives were lined up to testify against the bill at the Finance Committee's last scheduled meeting of the legislative session.
No other state has levied such a tax, one industry spokesman told the committee.
"It is not a new tax," Whipple countered. "The question is, what amount is it levied on? It's not complicated. It's a tax on the retail value of the room. Virginia is losing tons and tons of money because of this loophole."
Del. Bob Purkey, R-Virginia Beach, the committee chairman, said it seemed the bill might have "unintended consequences." He scheduled an extra meeting for the next day to consider it further.
At that meeting, Purkey said, "My phone's ringing off the hook." He had heard from hoteliers, real estate companies and travel agents, he said, all expressing "grave concern" about the bill.
Committee members appeared taken aback by the sudden onslaught of opposition to the measure. "There were still crickets chirping when it came over here," said Del. Mark Cole, R-Fredericksburg.
Del. Ben Cline, R-Amherst, chairman of the subcommittee that studied the bill, said it had received a full hearing there and should go forward. "I think we need to respect the work of the subcommittee," he said.
But it was not to be. Reversing the subcommittee's unanimous recommendation, the committee voted 12-8 to carry the bill over to the 2011 session.
Arlington Treasurer Francis O'Leary, who suggested the bill to Whipple, said the committee's action will cost Virginia and its localities some $33 million in lost taxes this year - $5 million in Virginia Beach alone - at a time when the state is scrambling to plug a $4 billion-plus hole in the budget and cutting hundreds of millions from public education and health care.
"This stinks," O'Leary said. "These people are stealing our money, and then when we try to get it back, they hire high-priced lobbyists to fight us."
Andrew Weinstein, a spokesman for the online booking companies' trade group, bristled at that charge.
"Every penny of tax owed on a hotel room is paid to the hotel and remitted to the municipality," he said. "We're intermediaries who charge a service fee. Those fees are not part of the cost of the room and they shouldn't be taxed as such."
Whipple said she'll be back next year to try to resurrect her bill.
"It's a fairness issue," she said. "It's just not right for them to pocket that money."
Bill Sizemore, (804) 697-1560, bill.sizemore@pilotonline.com

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo

well
So now we know that lobbyists really control this state.
It should have been killed!
It should have been killed! This sets the tax rate on the value, not cost. Next thing you know you go to a car dealer and dicker 5K of the cost and pay taxes on the MSRP vice the cost? So it's also bound to become that you go to the grocery and select 40$ worth of food but you save 10$ with coupons, Should you pay the additional .5$ because of the value of what you bought vice cost? This isn't in any way the direction we need to be looking as there is no end to the shenanigans. It could easily continue on to P property. "Just because you got a good deal is no excuse to deprive the state its money!"
wrong
the tax is levied on the price the room went for. I can understand you wanting to pay sales tax on the cost of the car to the dealer and not what you paid for it, but that is not how it owrks. Unless you are a lobyist for the hotels.
Right
That doesn't match the situation. What they want to do is add a new tax and force the local company to collect and remit it because they know they can't tax the company in the other state. No matter how you slice it it's a tax increase that will be paid by the consumer.
For those who can't understand the arguement, here it is:
Some company, we'll call it Orbpedia, has a website offering discount hotels. They arrange a bottom line rate with hotels, which THEY will pay, per night.
Orbpedia will pay Hotel 4, for example, $25/night; lets assume (*for simplicity) that the tax rate is 10%; Therefore, the TRUE room cost is $25+$2.50=$27.50, inclusive. Someone from some place connects to Orbpedia, and wants to stay at Hotel 4. Orbpedia charges them the $25 price for the room, plus an Orbpedia surchage of $5.00/night, for $30 total charge for the room. Although the article doesn't make it clear, there are two possibilities that may be occurring next:
1) Orbpedia then adds on the tax, at 10%, to raise the cost of the room to $33/night, inclusive. They then pocket their $5, pay the hotel the $25, pay the tax on $25 of $2.50, and $0.50 is left over. Guess who's pocket THAT goes to? It's not the hotel, it's not the person requesting the room, and it's not the state; Orbpedia pockets the extra $0.50, and the state wants that.
2) Orbpedia adds in the $2.50 room tax the hotel is requiring for the $25, for a total cost of the room of $32.50/night, inclusive. The state is saying that since the actual "roo
Incorrect
No, that's incorrect. You cannot keep any money that was on a tax line item.
Too long a post, so continued here.
The state is saying that since the actual "room rate to the purchaser" is $30, this reduces the amount the purchaser is paying below the legal tax rate. We can see this most clearly if we take a bad bargainer... he is set to pay $50 for the room ($45+5) because he bid wrong (which is possible). Since Orbpedia has a contract for the room at $25, they get to pocket the other $25 as profit; they then charge $2.50 tax (total all inclusive to the purchaser of $52.50) and remit $27.50 to the hotel (which pays the tax to the state). The effective tax rate is now 5%, instead of the legal 10%. So yeah, the state has a point; Orbpedia is siphoning out tax money that should be paid.
Don't vote for Purkey, check!
So as I see it...
There are something like 7 million folks living in the Old Dominion; three live at my house, plus my son and daughter (so 5). $33 Million/7 million is about $4.75/person; Bob Purkey, supposedly one of the representatives for my city, just $23.75 of my money for his campaign slush fund (because that's what he meant when he said "Unforseen Effects") of which he'll probably personally pocket $0.50 or so as "his share" of the bribes given out, er, campaign contributions for his campaign.
Yep, voting AGAINST Purkey in the next election, and anyone else who voted to move this back to committee.
and
just one more little thing for you brilliant tax professionals
the sales tax is what pays for the potholed local roads and the failed schools you all want
again, doesn't effect me much, I use the information highway for my business (and there are taxes on that bill) and my kids are on full academic scholarships at private colleges, because when the schools were failing them my spouse and I supplemented their education in every way we could
so when your kids have to pay an extra year of college before they can take their first college course, enjoy paying for that too
and I sure as heck do not
and I sure as heck do not want to support some develop company that gets government kick backs without having to pay for the infrastructure to support these projects
these developers have built their projects telling you that their project will decrease your taxes, have your taxes gone down? new trash fee, property tax increases, how's that working for you?
they don't have to build the roads or the schools or the hospitals to support their multimillion dollar projects, you do