Negotiators still divided on budget issues

Posted to: News State Government Virginia

RICHMOND

Six days into the budget negotiation process, House and Senate conferees hadn't settled any of the fundamental differences that divide them.

The team of 13 lawmakers - six delegates, seven senators - appointed to craft a state budget around a $4.2 billion shortfall remained stuck Tuesday night on the amount of fee increases and revenue reserves the two-year state spending plan should include.

Both sides exchanged offer sheets that the other flatly rejected.

The House, whose budget contains no fee increases for government services, proposed accepting some, but not enough to satisfy the Senate.

In turn, the Senate offered to reduce some of the millions in fees built into its plan and increase the size of its unspent budget balance.

Del. Chris Jones, R-Suffolk, called the Senate plan one built on "phantom" money from proposed fees, some of which didn't pass muster in the General Assembly.

"They want to spend every nickel they've got," he said.

The Senate proposes using money from increased court fees for sheriffs' and commonwealth's attorneys' offices. Other Senate fees would raise telephone surcharges to pay for a line-of-duty death and disability benefit program, and establish a fee on property and casualty insurance to pay some public safety costs.

Senate Majority Leader Richard Saslaw, D-Fairfax County, said the fees incorporated into his chamber's plan would enable lawmakers to avoid deeper cuts to core government services such as public education and human services.

"If they think we're going to walk out of here and gut our public schools, they're crazy," he said of the House.

The House plan cuts deeper into public education funding than the Senate's.

By failing to reach an accord Tuesday, lawmakers overshot a deadline to wrap up work on the budget. That doesn't mean they won't be able to finish by Saturday, the scheduled close of the two-month General Assembly session.

 

Julian Walker, (804) 697-1564, julian.walker@pilotonline.com

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

Balance the budget.

But not on the backs of state workers.
Everytime there is a budget crisis the politicians are quick to cut pay and benefits of the non unionized state workforce which has no effective voice and is defenseless against the whims and caprices of the General Assembly.
The General Assembly is always looking for the easy path of least or no resistance. Working people are easy targets for those of power and influence. Enough already. The state workforce is already underpaid and now the General Assembly wants them to sacrifice more of their take home pay for retirement benefits which were offered previously in lieu of pay. The so called "benefits in lieu of pay" unofficial policy. And they also want to increase health care premiums. This is effectively a substantial pay cut for working class state workers who haven't received an adequate cost of living raise in years and are struggling to provide for their families. Shame on the General Assembly! Will they ever do right by their state workers?

Permission granted

to stay as long as required. Overtime is allowed. Get it done.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: News rss feed    State Government rss feed   


Toolbox


Partners

special features