81°
forecast

Richmond-Hampton Roads rail plan gains speed

Posted to: Business News Norfolk Traffic - Transportation

NORFOLK

Momentum is building for running conventional passenger trains between Norfolk and Richmond as an interim step to getting high-speed rail.

The budget approved by the General Assembly last week waives a 30 percent match on state Rail Enhancement Funds, clearing a financial hurdle that will allow construction to begin later this year and for trains to run within three years.

"We can advance the project with state funds; otherwise, it would not have been able to go forward," said Jennifer Pickett, a spokeswoman for the Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation.

Pickett said there's ample money in the Rail Enhancement Fund - which comes from taxes on rental cars - to cover the capital costs of upgrading the existing freight tracks to accommodate passenger trains with a top speed of 79 mph.

The route roughly follows Interstate 95 between Richmond and Petersburg, then U.S. 460 between Petersburg and South Hampton Roads, with a terminus at Harbor Park in downtown Norfolk.

"I would describe this as a watershed event," said Barry Bishop, executive vice president of Greater Norfolk Corp., which has been lobbying for higher-speed trains to Hampton Roads.

"It gets us in the game," he said. "This is a beginning, not an end. It's far more likely we'll get federal funding with some rail service in place. High-speed service will come incrementally."

The budget is still subject to approval by Gov. Bob McDonnell, but Pickett said state rail officials are confident of his support.

Months ago, it wasn't clear the Hampton Roads region could even work together to push for rail service. President Barack Obama's emphasis on high-speed rail motivated leaders to work together to try to take advantage of new funding opportunities.

Brad Face, co-chairman of Virginians for High Speed Rail, said, "The region and the state very quickly made critical decisions which have historically been politically difficult.

"In the last few months, we've seen this unanimous expression of support for what really needs to be done because there is a realization there is little else we can do to present transportation options for Hampton Roads."

The state highway department recently forecast that interstate funding for Hampton Roads over the next 30 years will be cut in half.

"My observation is that on both the state and federal levels, rail is where they're putting money for transportation," Virginia Beach Mayor Will Sessoms said. "If we don't take advantage of it, shame on us."

Pickett said it was clear after two hearings in Hampton Roads on high-speed rail in recent months that there's "such overwhelming support for rail transportation in the region." Close to 1,000 people showed at a high-speed rail hearing in Norfolk.

That's when the state's new rail and public transportation director Thelma Drake, a former U.S. House member from Hampton Roads, sought ways to tap into the Rail Enhancement Fund for the service.

Still, many things need to fall in place before passenger trains to South Hampton Roads become a reality.

Agreements need to be reached with Norfolk Southern and CSX, which own the rails that the passenger trains would share with freight traffic. Both railroads are interested in partnering with the state to make it happen.

"We recognize that passenger service is something of value to the public," Norfolk Southern spokesman Robin Chapman said. "We are willing to share our tracks given certain conditions are met."

Norfolk Southern needs to be able to preserve and grow its freight capacity on the line, to protect itself from liability, and to be compensated for the use of its tracks, Chapman said.

Norfolk Southern estimates it will cost $75 million to upgrade its tracks along U.S. 460. The state is working with CSX on an estimate to upgrade its tracks around Petersburg and into Richmond. Details also have to be worked out with Amtrak to operate the service.

Funding also must be identified to subsidize operations. The legislature also agreed to task the state rail department to study how to create a sustainable rail operations fund for not only the Hampton Roads service, but other passenger rail in Virginia.

Money would still need to be found for likely stations at Harbor Park in Norfolk - where the track would tie into the light-rail line now under construction - at Bowers Hill in Chesapeake and in

Petersburg.

It would be the first passenger rail service from Norfolk since 1977. Amtrak runs two passenger trains daily from Newport News.

Meanwhile, the state is still pursuing high-speed rail service both between Washington and Richmond and between Richmond and Hampton Roads, which is more expensive and depends on federal funding.

Debbie Messina, (757) 446-2588, debbie.messina@pilotonline.com

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

We've got start sometime

Whether the general public wants to face it or not, we'll have to embrace rail sometime in the future. If built correctly, it is by far the most fuel efficient way to travel, and in many cases is actually quicker than traveling by air. If we take baby steps now, it will be much easier to build out when the economics make it feasible to do so. Corridors are expensive to obtain, and like anything else, efficiency will improve as begin to use it and understand it better. Is it going to be a money maker from the beginning? Probably not, but it will pay us big dividends in the future if we start planning now.

What year is it?

79 mph? Didn't trains go faster then that before the Civil War. All over the world thousands of miles of track are being laid for trains going over 200mph. China already has vast high speed networks. America's infrastructure is really semi third world.

What Year is it? REALLY???

Nickknock, I'm assuming you speak sarcastically and really are smarter than the comment you wrote. Of course trains can go 200mph in different parts of the world. However, with regard to proximity, the amount of money it would cost to build that type of "speed" from Norfolk to Richmond would:

A. Be significantly more expensive than slower alternatives (79, 91, etc.)
B. Travel time decrease for cost increase is negligible (< 10 min 1 way)
C. 200 mph from here to Richmond? That would be like taking the Concorde from Scope to Waterside.

As for the state of our infrastructure . . . I'm not going to disagree with you there. Many folks around the world are very jealous about our highway/interstate network. We do have lots of work to do though - you're right about that.

A rail system that works

It is a pleasure to see that Hampton Roads is on the verge of being connected to the evolving high speed rail network, and that our light rail system will intersect with it and provide a near door to door connection for eacy transfer. Given the re-balkanization of Hampton Roads that is the result of the failure of the House Majority to move forward on road infrastructure, and their continue commitment not to raise transportation related taxes and fees, our only real alternative is improvements in rail service.

Your candidate only got 41%

Your candidate only got 41% of the vote Mike.

Have you ever priced out riding on AmTrak?

If you have, you would know that it is NOT a reasonable cost and is not good use of money. Keep in mind that AmTrak is mainly paid for with your tax dollars and the price of a ticket is still out of reach. So now you want to subsidize a run between Richmond and Norfolk? I guess this is just so the rich can enjoy a train ride, it's certainly not for the average or low wage person. Go back to the drawing board and come back with something realistic.

stop complaining

Darn, can't we get anything without you types complaining about what it costs. Everything costs money so what else is new. You want to go back to horse and buggy. Get real!

and highways are paid by

and highways are paid by taxpayer money, and airlines get federal assistance. So criticizing rail travel compared to other forms of transportation is like the kettle calling the pot black.

Something fishy

Does it seem funny that the city of Norfolk is willing to drag all of us in debt for the light rail when no one wanted it. Now they are talking about a high speed rail connecting to it. There are too many suttle connections here. The light rail was over budget and the state and federal governments did not want to jump in. The total budget was cut low enough and they finally joined in. All of the cuts are now causing over runs that were in the budget to begin with. The president of HRT was forced to resign and as soon as that happened Virginia Beach and Chesapeake are not considering light rail. The board of directors of HRT are made up of city council members from Norfolk, Virginia Beach, and Chesapeake. Now a fast rail is going to throw money to Norfolk Southern and CSX to upgrade and use their rails. Our state and city delegates want us to believe that these are new ideas in the hopes to bring busness to our area. These plans were started years ago without us knowing. The fact that our delegates did not openly discuss this with the citizens when it was first considered makes this too fishy.

typeoo

I ment to say that the three cities are now considering light rail.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: Business rss feed    News rss feed    Traffic - Transportation rss feed   



Toolbox