The Virginian-Pilot
©
RICHMOND
On Sundays, children rule Room 220 in St. Paul's Episcopal Church. They squirm around in miniature chairs, listen to Bible lessons and play with a sandbox meant to represent the desert where Moses wandered for 40 years.
During the week, at least for the two months that the General Assembly is in session, this room is transformed.
The chairs are moved out, the sandbox set aside and a battalion of smartly dressed lobbyists armed with laptops and briefcases sets up a base of operations.
From this classroom, the Virginia Hospital & Healthcare Association monitors dozens of bills, determining which to push, which to squash, and which require their personal attention or a one-on-one visit with lawmakers.
Just across the street from the Capitol, the church offers quick access to legislators and their aides, said Katharine Webb, the association's senior vice president. "It's also a very peaceful place to work."
When lawmakers make their annual trek to Richmond, everything within a mile or two of the Capitol is pulled into politics: Empty condominium complexes fill up with legislators. Hotels awake from the winter doldrums to announce General Assembly rates. Lobbyists, lawmakers and their staffs huddle around restaurant tables.
St. Paul's finds itself in demand from a variety of groups.
When the Virginia Education Association brings in hundreds of teachers from across the state to flood the halls of government, they launch their effort with a briefing and coffee at the church.
Even the Jewish Community Federation of Richmond has hosted the governor and attorney general in the parish hall during its lobby day.
"It's neutral," said Matt Langsam, the interim executive director of the federation. "You don't even know you're in a church."
The church refers to itself as "St. Paul's at Capitol Square." Being part of the downtown community means participating in the state political scene as much as hosting the homeless for lunch, the Rev. Wallace Adams-Riley said.
As long as they don't endorse a candidate or political party, or participate in electioneering, church officials feel that their nonprofit status is safe.
Adams-Riley, 38, has protested in support of closing the so-called "gun-show loophole" on the Capitol lawn and spoken out against Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli's stance that state colleges can't adopt policies protecting gay and lesbian workers. He sports a shaved head, and on his blog he's been known to quote Archbishop Desmond Tutu on the importance of Christians' participating in politics.
Dating back to its early days, St. Paul's has been no stranger to Virginia politics. Jefferson Davis, the president of the Confederate States of America, worshipped in the Greek Revival-style sanctuary. Gen. Robert E. Lee sat a few pews away. More recently, L. Douglas Wilder, the state's first black governor, held his pre-inaugural prayer service at the church.
Leasing the church rooms brings in money and helps offset a small portion of the cost of maintaining the pre-Civil War building. St. Paul's charges nonprofits $600 per event for the parish hall, for example.
"This is not about income," Adams-Riley said. "It's about our mission, our ministry, downtown."
St. Paul's stops leasing its parish hall on Ash Wednesday, which marks the start of its Lenten lunch speaking series, said Linda Pitts, church facilities manager.
"Once Lent begins, we're all about Lent," she said.
Lobbyists have learned that they need to book almost a year in advance, especially when Lent is early.
St. Paul's has never turned away an organization that wanted space, Adams-Riley said. The only one he would imagine shunning is the National Rifle Association, he said.
"We want to host folks where our values are consistent with theirs," Adams-Riley said.
Fortunately, the NRA has never asked.
Deirdre Fernandes, (757) 222-5121, deirdre.fernandes@pilotonline.com

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo



Misguided Churches ...
... contribute toward watering-down Jesus' commandments. Instead of preaching the Gospel, these modern churches celebrate themselves with spectacles,show bands and lofty social causes, totally ignoring the Gospel. It's so bad,even a person such as Glen Beck who makes a career of trashing practically everyone,has found fault with the mighty evangelicals.
Jesus showed us we are our own worst enemy, a lesson not found in today's mega-churches where the mark of their Christian Service is measured by the number of attendees at their watered-down Gospel meetings who fill the offering bags and/or bequeath estates to churches' treasuries.
tyrants?!?
Wait a second?!? Tyrants? I must have missed some very important news.
Please share with me the link to the news story that relays that a person or group of people have seized power through force, thereby voiding the last election.
I am very worried about this tyrant business. I have voted in each and every election since I was 18 and to find out that it has all been for naught...
Oh wait a second...Oh, I see now:By 'tyrant' you meant our lawfully established and elected government.
Until we lose the vote, don't make claims that clearly reveal your alarmist ignorance.
Tyrant
ty·rant
/ˈtaɪrənt/
–noun
3. a tyrannical or compulsory influence.
-Dictionary.com
The interesting thing about the English language is that the various definitions of particular words makes it very versatile and expressive.
It's important to look at the context of a word in order to determine which definition applies in any particular usage.
For example: Where in my previous comment did I mention government? Since I didn't mention the government, the context of the sentence indicates that I was using definition #3 above and was referring to the subject of the comment, the anti-gun lobby, as tyrants.
I'm sure basic English courses are available at your local community college.
tyrant
Please explain to me how any one can force you to do anything that is not sanctified by law of the legitimate government?
Who then, if not the government, did you mean to imply was able to control you as a tyrant?
The Anti-Gun Lobby? How by voting? By protesting? Should we outlaw these because they hurt your feelings or because you disagree with them? Because you feel that when they voice their opinions they are in control of you?
Despite your own shortcomings (quite possibly the reason you feel the need to compensate by carrying a big gun), no one can possible have control over you unless you let them. When the government does pass a law or laws that control anything or anyone, it does so by way of lawmakers...WHO...wait for it, wait for it...are voted in by the public at large.
The courts? Either voted in or appointed by those who are voted in. Sub Committees...Arranged by people who are voted in...Very seldom do we run into any type of control that we are not a party to establishing.
You have the power. Vote.
Until then, stop crying.
Citizen access to government
This story skirts around a very serious problem for Virginia government.
Citizens need to have equal access to legislative committee activities, and legislators during sessions, as do well funded lobbyists, or the core of participatory democracy is broken.
Other states have included free parking space for Capitol visitors, including tourists, grassroots lobbyists, and pro's, when doing renovations as were recently done in our Capitol. Virginia did not. We added security and other barriers instead, adversely impacting by cost, convenience, time, or mobility challenges, the ability for most citizens to testify to a committee or meet representatives face to face. Other states have also created Capitol spaces for pro and grassroots lobbyists to function during sessions (though this article crosses into private meetings and events beyond that). We could do better at open government.
And there's the difference
"Fortunately, the NRA has never asked"
And there's a prime indicator of the difference between the statist, authoritarians of the anti-gun lobby, who are satisfied with nothing less than forcing all of society to bend to their will, and the people who lobby for freedom and liberty like the NRA.
If it was a church allowing the NRA or VCDL to use their facilities to stage prior to lobbying efforts, the anti-gunners would be picketing and passing petitions and whining about it in the media...just like they're doing to Starbucks because they have the audacity to refuse to bow to the will of the tyrants.
We on the side of liberty, however, recognize the right of any private entity to conduct themselves as they see fit. We don't ask anyone else to be forced to live by our standards, only that we be left alone to do so.
Is that too much to ask?