Va. first to ban mandated health coverage

Posted to: Health News State Government Virginia

By Bob Lewis

RICHMOND

Virginia's General Assembly became the first in the nation Wednesday to approve legislation that bucks any attempt by President Barack Obama and Congress to implement a national health care overhaul in individual states.

The Republican-ruled House of Delegates, with wide Democratic support, voted 80-17 without debate for the largely symbolic step aimed at the Democratic-backed reforms pushed by Obama and stalled in Congress. The vote sends the measure to Republican Gov. Bob McDonnell who intends to sign it.

Thirty-four other state legislatures have either filed or proposed similar measures — statutes or constitutional amendments — rejecting health insurance mandates, according to the American Legislative Exchange Council.

Obama carried Virginia in his historic ride to the presidency in 2008, the first Democrat to do so in a presidential race in 44 years. But since then, the tide has turned. Virginia's Republicans routed Democrats in last year's gubernatorial and legislative elections, partly because of public distrust of Democrats' proposed health care reforms.

GOP lawmakers expedited the bill and three others like it as a legislative statement reflecting broad voter discontent over the proposed reforms. Virginia's legislative session is, on average, the nation's briefest, and the bill passed four days ahead of Saturday's scheduled adjournment.

The legality of bills like Virginia's is questionable because courts generally rule that federal laws supersede those of the states.

The bill's sponsor, Del. Robert G. Marshall, R-Prince William, and other supporters advocated the measure as a defiant statement to an overreaching federal government. They say it falls under the Constitution's 10th Amendment that deals with state sovereignty. Marshall said he expects the law to be challenged and ultimately decided by the U.S. Supreme Court.

"There are limited powers the federal government has. Simply because of the supremacy clause, it doesn't mean anything that the Congress does, in fact, must be enforced at all levels of government in the United States," Marshall said in an interview after his bill won passage.

"It gives the state of Virginia the right to intervene on behalf of individuals should they decide not to pay for insurance and they refuse to pay the fine or they refuse to pay the fee or the tax or whatever you call it," he said.

Separate bills passed by the U.S. House and Senate would impose a penalty on people who don't have health insurance except in cases of financial hardship. The intent of the mandate is to expand the pool of people who are insured and paying premiums and thus offset the increased costs of insuring those with preexisting conditions or other risks.

More distressing for Virginia Democrats was that 21 of their 39 delegates in the 100-member House sided with the GOP in defying the initiative that is their party's national priority.

There was no immediate response to a telephone message seeking comment from former Gov. Timothy M. Kaine, now chairman of the Democratic National Committee.

DNC spokesman Alec Gerlach said Virginia's legislation only burdens middle-income families struggling to pay insurance premiums and medical bills, adding "they'll have to answer to those folks on election day."

One opponent of the bill likened its passage to Virginia's failed efforts to defy federal orders to desegregate public schools in the 1950s.

"It's a rejection of the federal role in the provision of health care and an extension of the old idea of interposition," said Del. James M. Scott, D-Fairfax. He was referring to a discredited legal theory that the state had a right to interpose itself to shield residents from some federal directives.

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

just cut off all federal money

I would like the see the General Assembly up the ante. Since the federal government is so evil, what if the feds cut off Virginia from all other evil federal money? Is Virginia trying to become more idiotic than South Carolina or Texas? Sure seems like it.

YES!!!

Just as what occured back in 1776, Virginia patriots were the first to stand in opposition of a tyrannical government that sought total control over the people it governed. Perhaps other states will look to Virginia and realise that government runs on the mandate of the people and not vice-versa.

Too Funny!

Just as what occurred back in 1861, Virginia patriots were the first to stand in opposition of a tyrannical government that sought total control over the people it governed. Perhaps other states will look to Virginia and realize that government runs on the mandate of the people and not vice-versa. Maybe South Carolina and the rest of the Southern coalition can try for another shot!

too sad

You might want to reread your American history. Virginia was actually the eighth state to secede from the Union. The first was South Carolina in 1860. Virginia, in fact, twice voted against succession. It wasn't until President Lincoln blundered by calling for a draft to invade the South that Virginia decided to leave the Union.

Too funny indeed.

Makes a statement

At least the Virginia GA is willing to make a stand for the citizens of Virginia.

Alot more than the spineless duo of webb/warner. They just mindlessly vote as harry reid tells them to vote.

Wouldn't matter

If the government fails to force you to buy something, they'll just tax the money from you and give it you for "free!".

This ain't 1776 anymore!

Right, Just like the government does for social security, medicare, federal & State taxes! Something in the constitution about providing for the defense of the nation and promoting general public welfare. Right up there with the right to bear arms!

since you mention the consitution

There's nothing in there about the federal government providing a retirement plan (social security) or subsidized health care (medicare). Unfortunately, Americans have gotten accustomed to the federal government overstepping its bounds they are not longer surprised when it wants to grab ever more power.

Show me!

Michael_Ragsdal and anyone else that wants to see the Feds mandate health care......Show me in the US Constitution where the Feds have the right to do this! It isn`t in any way, shape, or form! I think and hope the US Supreme Court is just waiting in the wings to say No, nope, nadda, no way on Gods green earth can Obama, Pelosi, Reid do this!

PAINFUL STUNT

Interesting, VA General Assembly wants to send a message to Feds - hands off. Yet, are begging Feds for dollars to help balance the state budget. Sadly, the state will look ridiculous because the President will sign the health care bill into law in the very near future.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: Health rss feed    News rss feed    State Government rss feed   



Toolbox


Partners

Find a HEALTH CARE PROVIDER

Doctor or facility name, keyword: i.e., optometrist, dental, home health care
City, State or Zip: i.e., Norfolk, VA or 23510
 

special features