The Virginian-Pilot
©
Editor's note: The beginning of this story indicates that Dorek Emanuel Hayes struck a Virginia Beach woman. He has been charged with drunken driving and hit-and-run with injuries, among others, but he has not been convicted of any of them in the December incident. Hayes is scheduled for trial June 14.
VIRGINIA BEACH
It's been 3-1/2 months since a man with a previous DUI conviction was charged with striking Mary Edwards while she walked home from a shopping center in December.
The impact broke her legs and ankles, dislocated her left elbow, smashed her left shoulder, cracked her ribs, bruised her lungs and knocked out several of her teeth. The injuries have left the 73-year-old woman bedridden.
And it all may have been avoided had the driver, who pleaded guilty to drunken driving three years earlier, faced harsher consequences after his first DUI, said her husband, Francis Edwards.
"If they had put this guy in jail the first time, there may not have been a second time, and we wouldn't be sitting here looking at her like this," he said, standing by his wife's bedside at the Bayside Healthcare and Rehab Center. "This is a result of that policy."
Under a bill passed by the House of Delegates last month, jail time would've been taken off the table for some misdemeanor offenses, such as first-time drunken driving, in order to save money on court-appointed attorneys for indigent defendants.
But the bill didn't pass the Senate before the legislative session ended. Francis Edwards said he was grateful.
The bill's proposal was insulting, Edwards, 73, said.
"When I saw that, I just saw red," he said. "I think we are too lenient with our criminal justice system."
Prosecutors still have the option of not pursuing jail time for some offenses.
Dorek Emanuel Hayes, the man accused of hitting Mary Edwards, is scheduled for trial June 14. He's been charged with drunken driving twice within a five-year period, maiming, refusing to take a blood or breath test, and hit-and-run with injuries.
If he's convicted, he'll face a mandatory 20-day jail sentence for the second DUI charge. The maiming charge is punishable by up to five years in prison and a $2,500 fine.
In September 2006, Hayes pleaded guilty to drunken driving and was sentenced to 60 days in jail, with all of the time suspended, according to court records. He was put on two years of unsupervised probation and ordered to pay a $350 fine and participate in an alcohol-safety program.
Mary Edwards said she was walking home from browsing the shops at Haygood Shopping Center the evening of Dec. 30 when she was struck from behind by the Mitsubishi Eclipse that police say Hayes was driving.
"I was walking home and a car hit me," she said. "I didn't really see much."
Several weeks later, she woke up in the hospital, unable to walk, eat or breathe on her own. She still has a feeding tube.
Police arrested Hayes, 29, about a block away from the crash site after he drove into a parked van. Inside the car, they found several empty and unopened bottles of alcohol, according to Circuit Court records. He was released Jan. 6 on $7,500 bond.
Francis Edwards said Hayes' insurance is helping to pay for his wife's medical care. They thought about suing him but didn't think it would be worth the trouble. Hayes is unemployed and lives with his father, according to court records.
At the Bayside Healthcare and Rehab Center, around the corner from where she was struck, Mary Edwards hopes to relearn how to walk and use her left hand, which is clenched in a fist.
"It is terrible being sick," she said. "I just wish this hadn't happened."
She probably won't be able to testify at Hayes' trial in June, but Francis Edwards said he'll be there. He said employees at the Haygood shops still ask how his wife is doing.
"They want to see her back out there pushing her shopping cart."
Kathy Adams, (757) 222-5155, kathy.adams@pilotonline.com

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo
I'm sorry but the argument
I'm sorry but the argument that drinking and driving must be outlawed because drunk drivers statistically kill people is bankrupt. If this is the argument you choose, we'll have to start sending police to low income areas to arrest children because statistcally low-income people become drug dealers. While they are children and haven't hurt anyone yet, they might when they get older. They should spend 5 years in jail to make sure they don't become drug dealers and hurt people for the first offense of being born to a low income family!
You Know What
This is a slap in the wrist solution to an ongoing problem of dealing with DUI,and DWI offenders. No wonder people don't have trust in the justice system. The law will change when someone hits their loved one. Then, and only then, will you see change and that's a shame. My prayers go out to the victims of these senseless crimes that could have been prevented.
DUI fines
Judges: society is demanding you do something ,anything, to send the message that you take DUI's serious. Give drivers the max fine of $2,500. Who has ever heard of anyone getting the max fine the very first time. Give them that one year in jail too. But you won't because you are mostly likely friends with the defendants lawyers and we all know you take care of your own. Better yet...suspend all monetary fines and give them the one year,unsuspended, in jail. The loss of income will be a fine in itself. Drivers laugh at the system and you because they'll get over on the system. Of course, their case will be appealed to circuit court, because the lower courts decision was "too harsh". Circuit court judges need to add the $2,500.00 fine in addtion to the one year. I dare you to do better!!! If I were a judge... it take a year to unravel everythibg I did in one day.
Did you know......
You can be ticketed for driving under the influence if you fall asleep at the wheel? It was until I was diagnosed with sleep apnea (after running off the road twice and thankfully only burst a tire) that my doc told me she was ordering a sleep test for me and if I didn't go through with it, she could have my driver's license revoked. Said it was as if you are driving under the influence. Of course, I had the sleep study done and am thankful everyday for my CPAP machine. I did not know the signs of sleep apnea but I suffered for about 4 years. I knew I had a problem, but I did not know what sleep apnea was. Only God and I know the near misses I had. I just thought I was tired as my mom was ill, my son was driving me crazy, etc, etc.
DUI
Here is the reality on this topic. First there are more than ample laws on the books to be effective with this type of violation of the law. As I see it the problem is punishment is not doled out equally; depending on who you are or your financial status. It is my belief if some of the discretion is taken away from judges and we go to minimum mandatory sentences, fines, and rehabilitation we could truly make changes. Maybe like for the first offense you get ten days in jail (and not pulled on weekends), a fine of $1500.00 and 30 days having to work on a road crew or some other public service job, I would bet you that would be a deterant. This mess of no consistency as to how to deal with this problem is what is killing us. God knows if I had the say so; what the punishment for the second and third offense would be. I assure you there would be no fourth offense if I had to make the decision. That being said; the only other question would be is how to deal with the ACLU or some other tree hugging bleeding heart liberal group:) have a good day and be safe!
DUI
Why don't these individuals get sent over to War and fight for their country. we feed, give them a place to stay and put a slap on there hand for crimes. Instead of sending all these young guys who could be spending time with their families, send all these criminals and train them and get them out jail so us tax payers don't have to pay for all their dumb mistakes. I bet there would be less crime with that punishment!
DUI's in Va Beach
Last August I had the unfortunate experience to go to court with my son who got a reckless driving and racing ticket. I figured he was going to get a fine a smack on the wrist and a stern talking to by the judge. To my shock and the parent of the other young man accused with my son they were each sentenced to 30 days in jail 28 suspended, suspended license for 6 months, and close to $900 in fines and court costs. While this was shocking the thing that shocked me the most were DUI cases sometimes not the first offense walked out of the courtroom with fines suspended license and their jail time was time served when they were arrested. The court system saying they are cracking down on DUI's is a joke. By no means am I trying to justify what my son and the other young man did. Just thought that Justice was not served fairly.
Never an excuse
My brother, like this unfortunate woman, was critically injured by a multiply-convicted drunk driver almost two years ago. The other driver had recently been charged with public intoxication (multiple times), disorderly conduct, public obscenity, selling illegal substances, and other offenses in addition to his DUIs. My brother received 30 breaks in and around his ankle (shattered), two broken femurs, 8 broken ribs, and a cracked vertebrae. The other driver was already on probation but didn't receive any jail time for this charges, of which he was convicted.
If the Commonwealth's Attorney's Office had done their job, chances are the other driver would have been in jail that night, and not crossing the two solid yellow lines in front of my brother's vehicle.
Today, my brother is 100% disabled and on Social Security. So much for the justice system.
WOW...
Some of these comments are way off! However, I wish the best for the women that was subjected to this irreversible crime. There should be consequences for persons driving under the influence. Losing licensees, community service, etc. are all good starts. However, there also should be a jail time for those that are repeat offenders. It should be like a felon. Three strikes and you are out! As far as those that are affected by these tragedies, the persons responsible should be paying for the rehabilitation or medical needs of these individuals. Simply put, you cannot cause damage to someone and simply say " I am sorry!" As individuals of society we must all bear responsibility!
The jail time should be from
The jail time should be from the first offense. There is enough literature, studies, stories, ect...for someone to realize that they shouldn't drink and drive. There is also people they can call, taxis to get home if they can't control themselves.
Three strikes is two strikes too many in my eyes. What if on the other two strikes they hit a child and it's head is cracked open with their brains spilling out on VB BLVD...I am sure no one would be asking for three strikes anymore...it would be first time...you're done.