77°
forecast

Chesapeake sizes up pros, cons of Nov. elections

Posted to: Chesapeake Elections News

CHESAPEAKE

The turnout in this year's City Council election was the lowest of any council race in at least the past six years, 16.3 percent.

Yet there doesn't seem to be any appetite to move Chesapeake's local elections from May to November, an action taken in recent years in Virginia Beach and Suffolk.

Democrats and Republicans in Chesapeake agree that moving the May elections to November could increase turnout. B ut it could also mean that local candidates would get lost in a cloud of state and national issues, and it could make running for office a lot more expensive.

"The good news is, you'd get more people to the polls," said Pete Burk-himer, chairman of the Chesapeake Republican Party. "But do they come to the polls better informed, or do they just flip a coin for the local races?"

Others worried that moving City Council and School Board elections to November would force local candidates to raise thousands more in campaign cash, and would ultimately lead voters to choose their City Council or School Board members based on party affiliation rather than their ideas.

"It would immediately turn partisan," said Councilman C.E. "Cliff" Hayes Jr., chairman of the Chesapeake Democratic Committee.

Low turnout for Chesapeake's May elections is nothing new. About 22.6 percent of registered voters cast ballots in the 2004 mayoral and council elections.

That figure dropped to 17.2 percent in the 2006 council race and was at about 18.1 percent in the 2008 mayoral and council election.

Compare that with Chesapeake's turnout of about 75 percent in the November 2008 election, which featured the presidential race along with two congressional contests.

Aside from this being a quiet election, Burkhimer said, he's not sure why turnout was at its lowest in recent years.

"I'm not (Virginia political analyst) Larry Sabato, so I don't have a good answer for you," he said.

Chesapeake Mayor Alan Krasnoff said the declining turnout may be a function of the growing number of registered voters. That number has increased to 142,362 from 119,368 in 2004.

"The turnout will naturally decline and probably always will in Chesapeake," Krasnoff said. "That is the reality, because the base of registered voters is getting larger."

Krasnoff said he would oppose moving the election at this point, citing the 2008 Virginia Beach mayoral race in which Mayor Will Sessoms raised more than $600,000 in campaign money. Chesapeake candidates typically raise less than $100,000.

"Elections should be about ideas and not how much money you can raise," Krasnoff said.

There appears to be little talk of a switch in Norfolk and Portsmouth, which both had elections last week.

"I'm not sure it's necessarily a good thing at all," Portsmouth Councilman Steve Heretick said.

"When we're way down the ticket under the presidential or gubernatorial race, I hate to say it, but City Council and School Board become an afterthought."

 

Pilot writers Dave Forster and Harry Minium contributed to this report.

Mike Saewitz, (757) 222-5207, mike.saewitz@pilotonline.com the turnout for this year's City Council elections, compared with the 75 percent turnout in the November 2008 presidential election.

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

go to a ward system first

To ease the transistion to November, it would be a good idea to stagger the number of coucil members up elections and switch to wards like Norfolk. Don't forget to include term limits as different in Norfolk.

Keep it in May

It is better to have a small turnout of voters who care about what they are voting on than a large turnout of the unconcerned. With the election in May the result is based on the will of the people who pay attention and care about who is running the city. If the election was moved to November, the results would be based on the will of those who are largely indifferent to the qualifications of city leaders.

Manupilation

Of course they don't want it to change as they now can get their handful of supporters to actually vote for them and be assured of remaining in office. Those in office with a 16 percent turnout cannot even consider they were elected by the people. A sham win and nothing to be proud of.

This May election trick should be made illegal by the General Assembly. Citizens are used to elections being held in November.

a very legitimate election and a mandate

Before too far - did you and everyone you know and everyone they know vote? IF you did and they did then you are practicing sour grapes. If you did not and they did not then you are practicing hypocracy.

The May election was perfect - most of the people are satisfied with allowing someone else to make decisions that affect the services provided by the city. A low voter turnout is a mandate of "I don't care what you do, just do it".

Elections

"All politics are local." Come November elections, vote out every incumbent....all incumbents!

Too funny

"It would immediately turn partisan," said Councilman C.E. "Cliff" Hayes Jr., chairman of the Chesapeake Democratic Committee.

The Democrat Chairman is on City Council, and he thinks the elections would "turn" partisan????

That's the funniest thing I've read all week.

He forgets who butters his bread

If not for partisan politics, Hayes would not even be on council!

Also too funny

"Others worried that moving City Council and School Board elections to November . . . and would ultimately lead voters to choose their City Council or School Board members based on party affiliation rather than their ideas." And that's not happening now?

And "ideas" who are they kidding. I've never seen a fresh good "idea" ever come out of a politician's mouth. Politics -- it's all about pandering to the masses and the joke is always on us.

Here's a very very stale old idea -- how about term limits for all.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: Elections rss feed    News rss feed   



Toolbox