The Virginian-Pilot
©
NAGS HEAD, N.C.
Amanda Finchem had planned a natural birth - no drugs or interventions - with her first child, but after a long labor she said she was diagnosed with "failure to progress" and underwent a cesarean section at The Outer Banks Hospital. She said it has gnawed at her ever since.
"I just wasn't sure it was necessary," she said.
Finchem, who leads the Outer Banks chapter of the nonprofit International Cesarean Awareness Network, said the procedure has become too common.
At the network's urging, Gov. Beverly Perdue proclaimed April Cesarean Awareness Month" to bring attention to unnecessary use of the major abdominal surgery, which involves cutting into the abdomen and uterus to deliver a baby.
When Finchem gave birth in 2004, the hospital's C-section rate was 36.1 percent and the statewide rate was 28.8 percent, according to the state Division of Public Health. By 2008, the hospital's C-section rate was 40.4 percent - the highest in the state. North Carolina's rate that year was 31.3 percent, and the national rate had climbed to 32.3 percent.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention report that C-sections in North Carolina increased 45 percent between 1996 and 2007, from 21.1 percent to 30.7 percent. New Jersey had the highest rate in the nation, 38.3 percent, and Utah had the lowest, 22.2 percent. The World Health Organization recommends that the C-section rate be about 12 percent.
The Outer Banks Hospital has eight obstetrical physicians with privileges on staff - three of them full-time. Van Smith, president of the hospital, said it has no policies on C-sections. "The physicians and the patients are the ones who make that decision. "
Smith said that the hospital's rate is one of the highest in the state mostly because of its location. Also, it has no neo-natal unit, he said, which makes a doctor less likely to chance a potential problem with a delivery.
"We are one of the smallest hospitals in one of the most remote areas of the state," he said. "If there's an abnormal indicator for the mother or the child, often a C-section is less risky."
Smith cited a survey that placed the hospital's birth-unit patient satisfaction in 2009 in the top 10 percent of the 183 hospitals surveyed by an outside market research group.
Eugene Declercq, a professor of community health sciences at the Boston University School of Public Health, attributes the steady rise in the use of C-sections to "practice changes" by medical providers who plan for the worst-case scenario rather than the more likely normal birth.
Declercq said that very few women schedule C-sections simply for their convenience. It is more common, he said, that women are not provided with information about other options or the potential harm from the surgery.
C-sections can be a life-saving operation, he said, and doctors may prefer them because they can be more efficient and predictable than vaginal births. They are also less likely to expose doctors to malpractice lawsuits.
But a C-section can make nursing and caring for the baby more difficult and cause post-surgical complications. It is also at least twice as expensive as a vaginal birth, Declercq said.
"Part of the challenge here is there are a lot of clinicians who are not at all bothered by this," he said. Even insurance companies, he said, are not complaining. But consumers are getting louder. "Now that we're talking about one out of every three, people are getting more alarmed about it."
Critics of C-sections say routine obstetrical practices such as induction of labor; lack of labor support from midwives; use of movement-restricting monitoring equipment; an unwillingness to let normal labor continue beyond a set parameter; and fear of malpractice lawsuits can all lead to a decision to section. Many doctors also do not allow vaginal births after a previous C-section, because of a small risk of uterine rupture, according to the National Institutes of Health.
At an NIH conference in March on the low national rate - 10 percent - of vaginal birth after cesarean, or VBAC, medical experts urged practitioners to reassess guidelines that have discouraged such births.
Finchem said that the goal of the International Cesarean Awareness Network is to help prevent unnecessary C-sections through a combination of education and support. The local chapter, with six members, has been meeting for about a year, she said.
Brandi Miss, a massage therapist and certified doula - someone who provides nonmedical support before, during and after birth - said she plans to open a nonprofit educational and support center in Nags Head for expectant and new parents. Miss said she has been hired to serve as a doula during a birth at The Outer Banks Hospital in July. It will offer a doula training course in September.
She said some pregnant women on the barrier islands have chosen to give birth in Elizabeth City or Virginia rather than give birth where the C-section rate is so high and no nurse-midwives or certified professional midwives are available. And there is no longer a birthing center on the Outer Banks.
"We're really the only culture where women birth alone," Miss said. "In this country, because we're so medicalized and industrialized, we've really taken out that 'miracle of life' part."
Catherine Kozak, (252) 441-1711, cate.kozak@pilotonline.com

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo
bottom line...
no one knows, including the doc, how each birth will end. There are too many variables and too many subsequent complications. FWIW, I had a vaginal delivery with my first child and a c-section with my second. I had NO complications whatsoever from my c-section and was up out of bed the same day. Vaginal deliveries can cause tissue tears which need stitches which cause pain, which cause other issues....I'd take another c-section in a minute. Is the ability to 'experience' a natural childbirth worth having a child born with brain damage from complications when it all could have been avoided? Birthing may be a natural process but it is NOT easy.
Greed
ONE WORD says it all.Especially at this hospital.
missing the point
I think some of you are missing the point. The point is that birth is an experience that a woman should have some control over and that a doctor should work with her in order to make sure that she is not only comfortable, but also somewhat in control of what is happening to her body. After all, it is her recovery that is slowed down by a c-section . . .
c-section births up on Outer Banks
Having given birth in Virginia to a baby via c-section in the 1970s, I feel called upon to comment. C-section births are just as miraculous as regular deliveries. The biggest problem is that once a woman has given birth by c-section, she will have a hard time giving birth in any other way.
I certainly didn't have any problems with nursing my baby or taking care of her.
However, I believe that c-section deliveries require that a mother stay in the hospital a little longer than after a regular delivery. This may bother the insurance companies.
Before condemning c-sections, let's think about a book I read about 20 years ago. It said that in the 1800s about half of all deliveries ended in the death of either mother or baby or both.
child bed fever killed women in the 1800s not lack of c-sections
Maternal mortality was so high in the 1800s because doctors didn't know enough to wash their hands between patients so they were spreading childbed fever and needlessly killing mothers. Germ theory didn't come about until 1864. Ignas Semmelweis discovered in 1847 that washing your hands between patients drastically reduced the number of mothers who died. However no one supported his idea until germ theory came about years later.
This is why so many women died- not because they had no access to c-sections.
You can't logically use the alarming amount of women who died in child birth in the 1800s as an argument in favor of c-sections and interventions. C-sections did not reduce the mortality rate from the 1800s- hand washing did. In reality the doctors were actually harming the patients and midwives at the time had much lower mortality rates.
Here's an idea
Instead of guessing about the effectiveness of a c-section, why not try something scientific like correlating major complications and deaths during childbirth against the c-section rate. Do higher c-section rates improve the rate of complications?
The last sentence says it all.
Our society no longer has respect for life or God.
i disagree
I take exception to this statement, as a new mom who had every intention of going through natural child birth. Because of all these reports Dr's have become more hesistant to performm C-sections, and I almost lost my little one because of it last month. I naturally went into labor and my baby started to not respond during contractions. They kept putting off the c-section hoping that it all would be ok, but then my baby stopped responding all together and I had to be rushed into an emergency c-section. The cord ended up being wrapped around his head 3 times and I was told he never would have survived a natural birth. Because of God's amazing grace (and His blessing the Dr. with the knowledge to perform the operation) I have a healthy little boy right now, but if it hadn't been for a c-section I wouldn't!!
Thank you for another
Thank you for another argument for long overdue tort reform, No Trust.
Well,a 200lb mother..
And a 20lb child coming down the chute......