79°
forecast

GOP primary to pick from six eager to vie with Nye

Posted to: Elections News U.S. House Elections Virginia

The Republican who takes on U.S. Rep. Glenn Nye in what is expected to be a tough November election campaign believes that reviving the nation's economy depends on cutting taxes and government spending, while limiting regulations that stifle job creation.

Just who that Republican is will be determined June 8, when the GOP holds a primary for the 2nd Congressional District.

All six of the candidates say that among the best ways that government can help the economy is to get out of the way.

All dislike last year's multibillion-dollar economic stimulus legislation that was approved by Congress with the support of Nye, a Democrat in his first two-year term.

The Republican primary, open to all voters, takes place in a district that includes all of Virginia Beach and the Eastern Shore and parts of Norfolk and Hampton. Norfolk's section is a crescent-shaped area that stretches from West Ghent and Larchmont north and east through Ocean View and south to Pleasant Point.

The field of one woman and five men includes several military veterans and independent business owners, who - with one exception - are making their first bids for elected office.

D elve deeper into their views on job creation, taxes and government spending, and differences emerge.

Scott Rigell, owner of Freedom Automotive, said the bane of entrepreneurs is the delay in starting a business caused by prolonged government reviews.

Establishing wind farms off Virginia's coast, for example, will take seven to nine years because of regulatory delays, Rigell said. In Great Britain, those projects get approved in two years, he said.

"I would challenge every single regulatory time limit on the federal books," he said. "I believe the government... is inhibiting job growth versus facilitating it."

Bert Mizusawa, a defense consultant and brigadier general in the Army Reserve, said he would boost the local economy by focusing on protecting and building up the district's military assets.

Mizusawa said the Defense Department can save money by consolidating its operations in those natural geographic locations - such as Hampton Roads - best suited for their needs, he said.

"We have some opportunities to save the U.S. taxpayers money and at the same time help the district," he said. "What's good for this district is good for America."

Scott Taylor, a former Navy SEAL who operates real estate and fitness businesses and ran unsuccessfully for Virginia Beach mayor in 2008, said he wants to find federal programs that could be run more cheaply by private industry.

Several candidates support the trickle-down economics theory championed by former President Ronald Reagan, which asserts that cutting taxes will stimulate the economy and, in turn, increase government revenues.

Ben Loyola, owner of Loyola Engineering, wants to freeze all federal hiring and give across-the-board tax cuts.

"You spur the economy with lower taxes," Loyola said. "I believe it and I've seen it. Less taxes produces less unemployment and less crime."

Jessica Sandlin, a freelance writer, would push for abolition of the corporate income tax.

"That sounds crazy, but they just did that in South Carolina, so we will have a metric to see if it works or not," she said.

Ed Maulbeck, a construction contractor, wants to cut taxes but also wants more parity in the tax system.

"I think there's a large amount of people who are overtaxed. I think there is a large amount of people who are paying little or no tax," he said.

Rigell supports deep cuts in the tax on capital gains and favors making permanent the Bush administration tax cuts on larger incomes, inheritances and businesses that expire at the end of this year.

All the candidates see some promise in abandoning the federal taxes on income, capital gains, inheritances and Social Security and Medicare payments in favor of a national consumption or retail sales tax that would be levied on goods and services.

Such a dramatic change, several said, has to be done slowly and requires more study.

Three candidates - Loyola, Mizusawa and Rigell - have signed the pledge developed by the conservative group Americans for Tax Reform to oppose any increase in the federal income tax.

The pledge doesn't stop them from approving a new tax to replace the income tax as long as there would be no overall increase.

Taylor did not sign the pledge but says on his website that he "will never support any tax increase."

All the candidates said they believe there is a significant amount of wasteful spending that can be cut.

Sandlin said she wants to do "some serious whacking" in the departments of energy and education. Loyola agrees, arguing that education should be handled solely by localities and states.

Mizusawa said there's duplicative defense spending that could be reduced. Rigell and Taylor say that Medicare and Medicaid are ripe with abuse that, if uncovered, could save billions of dollars.

Maulbeck is particularly incensed that the federal government is continuing to hire more people.

"Is the government out if its cotton-picking mind? We are doing federal job fairs when the entire economy is in the tank," he said.

"Who is going to pay for this? We can't afford it."

Bill Bartel, (757) 446-2398, bill.bartel@pilotonline.com

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

Here's a thought

One complaint that many have regarding our current and past governments is the bought vote, the "I'll get you if you get me" mentality. And yet, so many people say they're voting for someone because they know them, the candidate is a good customer, they're neighbors, their niece goes to school with the candidate's neighbor's-uncle's-mechanic's-nephew.

People forget this is the very basis of back-door dealings. A person's vote is owed to no one because of coincidence, relation, shared hobby, etc. A person's duty to him/herself, to this country, is to find a candidate whose beliefs and political standing reflect what they believe is the best path for this nation. This is what makes us a FREE NATION.

I wish that people would remember this. That in the June 8th Republican Primary they don’t vote for who they think they owe, but for who they believe in!

Just some data

so the hyperbole around the debt is brought into line with reality. No party or president is innocent of not increasing the debt, and only one, Bill Clinton, was able to balance the budget, and that with a GOP COngress.

National Debt by year, in billions
1960 - 290.5
1970 - 380.9
1980 - 909.0
1990 - 3206.3
2000 - 5628.7
2001 - 5769.9
2002 - 6198.4
2003 - 6760.0
2004 - 7354.7
2005 - 7905.3
2006 - 8451.4
2007 - 8950.7
2008 - 9985.8
2009 - 12311.4
2010(est) - 14456.4

So no party is free from guilt. Since 1981 - 1993 were Reagan/Bush years seems they are responsible for that debt, as Obama is for the current debt, as was W Bush for the debt between 2001 and 2009. Let's realize that neither party has the right to talk about fiscal discipline.
(For the record my source is Wikipedia, so take it as you will)

92 Percent? Guess again.

During the 2 terms of President Reagan, the 1 term of President George H.W. Bush, and the two terms of President George W. Bush, the national debt increased a total of $7.6 trillion. The current national debt stands at $13 trillion. According to my calculator, 92 percent of $13 trillion is just shy of $12 trillion, so I'd say that's a grossly incorrect percentage. It's tough to refute the truth.

Corrected website name to research campaign contributions

sorry for the typo

fundrace(.)huffingtonpost(.)com

Rigell donated to Obama & seems to be more of a mod progressive

Not only did Rigell donate over 1,000$ to the Obama Campaign...
funsrace(.)huffingtonpost(.)com is the source of this info.

He also has these skeletons in his political closet...

Rigell gave $1,000 to gubenatorial candidate Democrat Mark Warner, (source: VPAP.org) & Warner signed into law the largest tax increase in Virginia’s history!

In 2002, Rigell provided funding of $10K to the YES Campaign- a
referendum that would have raised the Hampton Roads sales tax for residents. If that would have passed, sales taxes in Hampton Roads would have increased by 22%!!! Rigell’s stood behind his proclamation by stating it was the best way to fund transportation in our area. Luckily, for HR residents, the residents said, “NO” and the YES Campaign fell flat on it's face !

WHERE'S THE BEEF?

“Elect a Proven Leader” is Rigell’s campaign slogan. I already know his base story: bought a car dealership with Daddy-in-Law’s cash, built a successful car dealership; hires employees that sell and repair cars; rich enough to campaign full time for the last 6 months; greases wheels & palms with estimated half-million $$$s to local and state politicians and community groups; GOP favored son.

Since he's marketed as the frontrunner, there MUST be more to this guy. Unfortunately, can't locate any real accomplishments or history of ‘leadership’ on his web site or in the media. What am I missing?

I like Sandlin.

Just based off their positions on their websites, Sandlin's my favorite.

Think About What You're Doing

Voters need to wake up and think about this - if they send Scott Rigell to the U. S. House, he will be nothing more than another elitist Republican who has no original ideas. I am conservative through and through, but will not support or vote for any one who is part of the Virginia Beach GOP machine. There are several other good candidates in the GOP primary, and my money will be on one of them.

Examine the choices very carefully. See that what I am cautioning against is worth noting.

They all support "trickle

They all support "trickle down economics", that means none of them are competent.

Not Scott Rigell

I'm sorry, but although the Governor has come to bolster a failing campaign, the primary electorate has come to realize that although Rigell professes conservative ideals, he is truly a moderate progressive. His past public stances and financial support has empathized with issues of adding regressive taxation, unreasonable transportation subsidies, and expanding an unelected regional taxing authority. He is definitely not what we need in Washington and should stick to what does best; managing and motivating car sales.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: Elections rss feed    News rss feed    U.S. House Elections rss feed   


Toolbox


Partners