76°
forecast

Military gives preliminary OK to Va. wind tracts

Posted to: Environment Military Virginia

By Steve Szkotak

RICHMOND

Wind turbines could co-exist with military activities off Virginia's coast depending on their locations, a Defense Department assessment has concluded.

Proponents of commercial wind power 12 miles or beyond Virginia's coast believe the giant turbines could ultimately provide 10 percent of the state's annual electricity demand and operate without incident in the military's busy seas.

"I look at this as a very positive thing," said Hank Giffin, a retired Navy vice admiral and a member of a coalition promoting offshore winds. "Initially there were a lot of people who were concerned the Navy would just say no."

Released Wednesday, the Department of Defense assessment looks at 25 tracts identified for optimum winds. The report identifies 18 tracts as compatible with military needs and rules as long as certain guidelines are met. They were not detailed in the report.

Other tracts were ruled out because they conflict with Navy activities.

The area is used to test drones and by helicopters that sweep the ocean surface with mine-detecting sleds. Wind-power advocates have said they will honor the military's concerns and not build where there are potential conflicts.

The wind industry fared better with the military than oil and gas proponents, who were told by the Pentagon that exploration 50 miles off the Virginia coast would interfere significantly with military operations.

Both industries have to contend with Norfolk Naval Station, the world's largest naval base, a NASA launch facility on the Eastern Shore of Virginia, and other military facilities that operate in Hampton Roads.

But submarines and most live munitions practices occur beyond the ideal area for wind turbines — 12 to 25 miles offshore and on the continental shelf, where water depths are a relatively shallow 100 feet. The 222-square-mile area identified by the Interior Department's Minerals Management Service for wind energy is also much smaller than the 4,500 square miles identified off Virginia for offshore oil and gas areas.

The Defense Department report was released by the Virginia Offshore Wind Coalition. The Navy did not immediately respond to The Associated Press for comment. Some portions of the report, deemed classified, were not released.

The Navy has an interest in supporting renewable energy such as wind. It has set a goal of achieving 50 percent of its land-based energy needs from renewable sources by 2020.

"The Navy is willing to work with the offshore wind industry because they know the importance of it, and they're really enthusiastic for the opportunity to work with us," said Giffin, who is affiliated with the coalition.

The coalition has identified 25 leasing tracts that could generate 3,200 megawatts of offshore wind. Within two decades, 9,700 to 11,600 jobs could be created with the development off an offshore wind industry, a coalition study concluded.

Developers of what would be the nation's first offshore wind farm won federal approval in late April. Developers of the 130-turbine Cape Wind project off Massachusetts want to generate power by 2012.

Two energy companies have expressed interest in the Virginia tracts, which are not likely to be developed for five years or more.

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

Shouldn't even be a second thought about it.

A wind farm is so logical, I find it is hard to believe that anyone would be against it. Unless it is because of some self serving interest. (like I don't want a ugly wind farm messing up my view) Sorry about your loss of view, which I don't really think it is as the turbines actually look kinda cool to me. Time to get real people, it doesn't get cleaner and cheaper than a wind farm.

Come on now

There is room for wind turbines and navy ops but not for oil drilling derricks. Which special interest do you believed pulled this off?

Come on now

Did you even read the article? Oil drilling is in the same area as Navy training. Windmills are not. Oil drilling would interfere with navy operations. Windmills would not.

Wind is different than oil

Wind Farms are different than Oil Platforms on many accounts: 1. Wind farms are 12 to 20 nm whereas oil platforms are 50 to 200 nm from shore, 2. Wind farms have limited traffics to and from them whereas oil platforms have tankers going back and forth, and 3. Wind farms reduce carbon emissions whereas oil tankers pollute.

Wind is different than oil

Wind Farms are different than Oil Platforms on many accounts: 1. Wind farms are 12 to 20 nm whereas oil platforms are 50 to 200 nm from shore, 2. Wind farms have limited traffics to and from them whereas oil platforms have tankers going back and forth, and 3. Wind farms reduce carbon emissions whereas oil tankers pollute.

strategic interests

of which you may be unaware.

Think!

Windmills don't blow up and kill you (not to mention dumping unending oil slicks into the ocean) if you hit one in a training accident.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: Environment rss feed    Military rss feed   



Toolbox


Partners

 

special features