©
In the weeks following the BP oil well rupture, the response by President Barack Obama and Gov. Bob McDonnell was marked by a fretful hesitation to fully confront the ramifications of the catastrophe. Last week finally brought signs that both men are now taking a more pragmatic approach to the crisis.
Obama accepted responsibility for quelling the undersea hemorrhage and cleaning up the mess. McDonnell acknowledged the wisdom in delaying plans for new drilling off Virginia's coast, though he expressed regret that the president went further than that and canceled new exploration.
The question facing each man this week is whether he will grasp the opportunity for leadership presented by the crisis or become mired in its oily trap.
Obama's task is twofold. First, he must clean up the incestuous culture that exists between federal regulators and the oil industry. More importantly, he must lead the country to face the fact that it has no comprehensive energy plan, and the continued failure to devise one will bring painful and disruptive consequences.
Americans must decide whether our love affair with dirty fossil fuels is so ingrained that we are willing to endanger our economy and our most precious natural resources. If not, what steps are we prepared to take over the next five, 10 and 20 years to re-invent and recharge our energy policies? That's an important conversation, but one that won't happen until the president takes the lead.
The challenge facing McDonnell is more parochial, but it is one that has flummoxed Republican and Democratic governors for a quarter century. The transportation plan McDonnell unveiled last year included revenues he hoped to secure from royalties paid by oil companies with rigs in the Atlantic. By including those uncertain dollars in his plan, he acknowledged that Virginia needs more money in order to pursue new road and rail projects.
That hasn't changed.
What changed last week is that McDonnell knows with certainty that Virginia will not see a dollar of oil royalties during his term, if ever. While that's a disappointment, it is nevertheless a gift to have the issue settled four months into his term. Rather than waste years waiting for imaginary riches, he now has time to revise and implement a more realistic blueprint for relieving traffic congestion and investing in vital infrastructure.
The plan he released last summer was already unraveling before the oil spill. Resistance from federal authorities forced him to back away from his proposal to use tolls from Interstate 85 to fund a new U.S. 460. The General Assembly remains unenthusiastic about his plan to privatize state liquor stores and use the revenues for roads.
McDonnell made a mistake in rejecting a gas tax increase as a gubernatorial candidate. His many years of experience should have taught him that he would need to remain flexible in order to achieve his goals. But it would be uncharacteristic of McDonnell to throw up his hands in defeat at these setbacks. Instead, he must revise what was always a first draft into a mature and workable plan for making good on his most important campaign promise.

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo
Fantasy
"What changed last week is that McDonnell knows with certainty that Virginia will not see a dollar of oil royalties during his term, if ever."
Before the election, everybody but McDonnell and his supporters knew that Virginia would not receive any oil royalties during his term. Even under the most wildly optimistic assumptions, there could not have possibly been oil revenues within four years. McDonnell's plan to fund transportation was always a fantasy.
Actually
McDonnell knew it too, but it helped get him elected.
And add to that
any oil retrieved may very well be sold on the open market - thi smeans exported for refinemnet.
The natural gas would likley be held for US consumption, but some or even most of it would be exported.
It's unbelievable that anyone would assume any petroleum product(s) retrieved from off the coast would equate to money for Virginia.
Bottom line is that whomever sinks the well and obtains this resource can do with it as they please. The distance from shore is beyond Virginia's reach/control over what occurs there.
BP Advertisement from 1999
BP Advertisement from 1999
http://economistsview.typepad.com/economistsview/2010/05/bp-advertisement-from-1999.html
I am pretty sure it is meant to be a joke
Oil spills were bad back then, too, and I cannot imagine any oil company approving copy like that.
That was only a decade after the Exxon Valdez and the words "oil" and "shore" did not mix well, just like…well, you know.
Amazing
A BP ad from 1999 using a logo they did not adapt until after 2000.
I guess that would make it a forward looking advertisement.
Or a forgery.
Right. Don't drill off our coasts.
Drill off some OTHER country's coasts.
BUY the oil from THEM at whatever price they decide to charge.
Then: Tax, Baby, tax!
That's the solution?
"That's the solution?"
That was the republican solution under Bush.
It was Obama, not Bush, who supported drilling for oil off Virginia.