©
From Pilot and wire reports
RICHMOND
Some Virginia leaders are reconsidering their support for drilling off the state's coast after a fatal well accident in the Gulf of Mexico, even as Gov. Bob McDonnell continues to lobby aggressively to set up platforms to drill for oil and natural gas without delay.
McDonnell, who has made drilling off Virginia's coast one of his administration's top priorities, flew to Houston on Monday to tout the benefits of offshore drilling at an industry-sponsored conference. He told reporters before he left that he does not want to postpone drilling but to learn from the accident off Louisiana's coast.
"What we do as Americans is we find out what went wrong and how can we do things better," McDonnell said. "I think that's the spirit of the American people."
President Barack Obama announced in March that Virginia will become one of the first East Coast states to drill offshore for oil and natural gas. Companies could start bidding on contracts to conduct exploratory drilling in Virginia's waters 50 miles off the coast late next year or early in 2012.
In Virginia Beach, Mayor Will Sessoms said he would be worried if that timetable were not altered. Sessoms supported drilling and helped the city pass a resolution in favor of it, in part to help the tourism industry by keeping the cost of gas down. But, he said, the Louisiana accident was a wake-up call. "It's alarming to me," Sessoms said. "It gives me great concern."
Obama vowed Friday that no expansion of offshore oil drilling would take place until federal investigations into the Louisiana accident are complete.
Virginia's senators, both Democrats who support drilling, said they agree that drilling should be delayed. Sen. Mark Warner said it was "appropriate" for Obama to delay offshore projects until safeguards are in place to prevent rig explosions like the one that caused the gulf spill, his spokesman Kevin Hall said. Sen. Jim Webb said "the facts must be ascertained to determine how the disaster off the Gulf Coast could have been prevented" before drilling takes place, his spokeswoman Jessica Smith said.
Democrat Glenn Nye, whose 2nd District includes part of Norfolk and all of Virginia Beach, agreed.
"Congressman Nye believes that offshore drilling must be done in an environmentally safe and responsible way that does not threaten Virginia's tourism or fishing industries," said Clark Pettig, Nye's spokesman. "He feels that it is appropriate to delay any drilling off the coast of Virginia until the investigation of the gulf disaster is complete so we can ensure the same thing won't happen here."
Republican Del. Ron Villanueva of Virginia Beach sponsored state legislation supporting oil drilling off the Virginia coast earlier this year. He said he supports Obama's decision to delay new approvals. "We need to make sure that environmental safeguards are integrated with whatever we do in the future," Villanueva said.
McDonnell said he wants to see a full investigation into the Louisiana accident, but he still thinks that drilling could begin off Virginia's coast as soon as next year or early 2012.
He campaigned last year on paying for road improvements in part with proceeds from oil and gas drilling. Congress would still need to pass a bill to allow Virginia to receive royalties from offshore oil or gas drilling, as it did in 2006, when it allowed Gulf Coast states to begin taking home 37.5 percent of revenue. McDonnell has also said that drilling off Virginia's coast would create thousands of jobs and millions in tax revenue, as well as lessen U.S. dependence on foreign oil.
An explosion and fire April 20 on an exploratory well in the Gulf of Mexico left 11 workers missing and presumed dead. Crude oil has been leaking into the gulf since. The accident confirmed fears of environmental groups and members of Congress already worried that possible spills and new infrastructure could harm plants, animals, tourism and the Norfolk Naval Station.
Rep. James Moran, a Northern Virginia Democrat and chairman of the appropriations subcommittee for the interior and environment, wrote a letter to Interior Secretary Ken Salazar, urging him to reconsider allowing offshore drilling.
The last study of the Atlantic Ocean by the federal government, conducted two decades ago, estimated that at least 130 million barrels of oil and at least 1.14 trillion cubic feet of natural gas could be off Virginia's coast. That's equal to the amount of oil used in six days and the amount of gas used in less than a month in the United States.
Many experts think tests on similar geographic areas in other parts of the world and limited seismic work off Virginia's coast indicate that there is far more oil and natural gas offshore, although no one has been able to show accurately what is there because of federal restrictions.
This story was compiled from reports by The Washington Post and Pilot writer Deirdre Fernandes.

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo
The elephant in the room...
is that eco-terrorists probably did this.
Not expecting it to spread this greatly of course, but just to 'prove' off-shore drilling is bad. I can totally believe that they would sabotage ONE to make the point.
Think about it - these rigs withstood a CAT 5 Katrina and did not spill oil, but within a month after the administration decides to open up off-shore drilling we have the worst incident the industry has had... coincidence? There are no coincidences.
So your theory is that
So your theory is that people interested in saving the water from contamination blew up the platform, or caused it to stop other water ways becoming polluted? That they actually foresaw a valve not closing correctly and were willing to sacrifice large amounts of marine life and their fellow man to be right?
Get some sun brother.
Lack of Trust
What I find most disturbing in this entire mess is the lack of a preconceived, well thought out emergwency plan to deal with this situation. Apparently, all the past promises and pledges that such a situation is most unlikely to occur, but if it does, modern technology will produce a full proof manner to deal with it was a total fabrication in the first place. So tell me, how could any reasonable person believe that such a disaster could not occur off the coast of Virginia Beach? And even if the pledge were made that "it could never happen here, and if it did, we know how to deal with it".. would anyone besides our Governor actually believe the industry?
BP
Whether it was BP, Exxon, Sunoco etc. We will eventually pay for it. The oil from that well was not exclusively BP's, they are the operators. Even so, any excuse to raise prices will be incorporated by "Big Oil".
we need to press on
The first oil rig disaster of this magnitude ever off our shores and now we cower? Come on for chrissakes. If the pioneers did that when they heard a family had been lost to the wild while trying to cross for a better future where would we be? What the heck happened to the American spirit. We finally have a plausible chance at moving away from foreign dependency. Let's not let the tree-hugging mindset deter our resolve.
what did we learn from chicken little?
The sky is falling! The sky is falling!
If politicians are opposing new oil drilling then they either need to resign or enjoy the voters voting them out of office! Are they so incompetent to think that the permit issuers and the drilling operation owners and those that supply oil rig services are not going to LEARN from this ONE oil rig disaster?
Look at the double hull oil tankers that are in place after the major reason for the oil leaking out of the Exxon Valdez was the single hull.
It is wrong to oppose new oil drilling. Again, it is irresponsible for politicians to be opposed to new oil drilling because that is thinking that the industry and the communities are not capable of LEARNING.
We are consumers and as a community and as an industry LEARN - if you have a doubt of learning then look at the NORMAL safety in the cars of today versus the passenger safety of twenty years ago. We LEARN.
portworker: "Again, it is
portworker: "Again, it is irresponsible for politicians to be opposed to new oil drilling because that is thinking that the industry and the communities are not capable of LEARNING."
And yet, no one is saying that in this article. Delaying new drilling to investigate and "LEARN," but not oppose outright.
You really do like setting up strawmen to knock down! If you're going to belittle others, at least get the basic fact right first.
Except for Congressman Moran you would be correct
It is too bad the article forgot to not iclude such an important person as the chairman of the appropriations subcommittee for the interior and environment. Oops, the article did not forget.
It is amazing that such a strawman does not exist.
Is that enough of the basic facts right first?
Newsflash for PortWorker: The sky fell!!
And it continues to fall as that well pumps oil into the gulf. Funny thing about learning. The same posters here told us time and again that offshore drilling was riskless. That the oil companies had learned so much over the years. Only to be proven tragically wrong. Yet, being proven tragically has no impact on their desire to share their impeached opinions on offshore oil drilling.
thank goodness for hard hats and steel toe shoes
The sky is falling! The sky fell! The turkey drowned by looking at the rain. Do you want us to be turkeys or humans?
RISKLESS???? Do you seriously expect that anyone said RISKLESS as in absolutely NO danger or hazard? Do you seriously expect that anyone would believe such an outrageous statement, "The same posters here told us time and again that offshore drilling was riskless."?
There is RISK for just about everything, including oil drilling. What people say is what is ACCEPTABLE risk?
What the point is that we should LEARN from this instead of retreating. Since the opponents of offshore drilling have already determined it will take years to drill then it is imperative that we move forward and improve along the way. All the way up to the drill touching the ocean floor - and then keep on improving.