©
By Michael Sluss
RICHMOND
Two Democratic leaders in the House of Delegates are asking Gov. Bob McDonnell to put the Virginia State Police in charge of an investigation of an embattled veterans charity organization.
That organization, the U.S. Navy Veterans Association, is being investigated by the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services for possible violations of the state’s charitable solicitation law. The group is under scrutiny in multiple states. VDACS launched its investigation last month after news stories raised questions about the organization’s practices, including solicitations in Virginia.
House Minority Leader Ward Armstrong, D-Henry County, and Del. Ken Plum, D-Fairfax County, the chairman of the House Democratic Caucus, made their request in a letter to McDonnell this afternoon. The two Democrats suggested that violations by the U.S. Navy Veterans Association may extend beyond the state's charitable solicitation law.
The association’s national director, Bobby Thompson, contributed $67,500 to Virginia candidates and elected officials last year -- almost all Republicans - including $55,500 to Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli. During the same year, the association was quarreling with the state over whether it qualified for an exemption from annual registration requirements under the charitable solicitation law.
Armstrong and Plum questioned whether U.S. Navy Vets “exerted or attempted to exert undue influence on a candidate for state office in an attempt to counter an adverse ruling by Virginia's Office of Consumer Affairs regarding the Association's charitable exemption reporting status.”
“Because we are dealing with potential criminal misconduct outside the jurisdictional purview of the Virginia Office of Consumer Affairs, we request that you immediately redirect the investigation to the Virginia State Police and that the scope of the investigation include all possible violations of state and federal law occurring in the Commonwealth of Virginia, including, but not limited to violations of our charitable reporting statutes,” the lawmakers wrote.
McDonnell spokeswoman Stacey Johnson said the administration is reviewing the letter.
"We have no further comment at this time and cannot comment on what action may or may not be taken by the State Police," Johnson said.
Cuccinelli has said that Thompson asked for nothing specific in exchange for his campaign contributions. During last year’s campaign, Cuccinelli proposed moving Virginia's consumer affairs department from VDACS to the attorney general’s office. Cuccinelli said earlier this month that he never discussed the idea with Thompson or anyone with the veterans group.
The House of Delegates this year passed legislation that would shift certain functions of the consumer affairs office into the attorney general’s office. But VDACS would have maintained jurisdiction over the charitable solicitations law. The bill, which Cuccinelli has said he supported, died in a Senate committee.
The U.S. Navy Veterans Association has been mired in controversy since March, when the St. Petersburg Times in Florida published a series of stories that raised questions about the association's fundraising, its expenditures and the existence of its members.
The association lobbied for Virginia legislation this year that could exempt it from annual registration requirements after July 1. The bill passed the General Assembly unanimously, and McDonnell signed it into law before becoming aware of the controversy surrounding the association, his staff has said.

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo



nice partisan grandstanding - don't forget to point and laugh
So the two Democrat legislators are calling for an investigation into the operation of US Navy Vets which is not based in Virginia and isn't doing business here. Do the two Democrat legislators want the State Police to go to a state that the charity is actually doing business and conduct an independent investigation? Would that independent investigation be in cooperation with the state police they are in?
Can you imagine that at least two states where US Navy Vets is actually conducting business are conducting investigations right now. Will a reporter ask the two Democrat legislators which pecking order would Virginia fall for a prosecution of solicitation of a charity without permission?
It isn't that the charity doesn't need to be investigated, it is just LAUGHABLE that two Democrat legislators think that Virginia has a superior case.
Hyperpartisanship
Hyperpartisans (like you and others on both sides of the aisle) make it extremely difficult for non-aligned people to keep a straight face. Fact is that you're h bent on overlooking or defending the worst excesses of those with whom you agree and crying fowl at the most minor activities of your political opponents. It wasn't the hyperpartisans who built this nation; they are all too h bent on gaining an edge or enforcing some sort of ideological purity while non-partisans do all the work.
By participating in the Virginia electoral process, US Navy Vets DID conduct business in Virginia. Serious charges have been leveled and the VSP are in a unique position to prove or disprove the allegations. Honestly, I hope they DO investigate and that they DO disprove the allegations. That would remove ANY suspicion of wrongdoing in this election and solidify the position of properly elected officials.
The only ones who really lose in such an investigation are hyperpartisans on both sides who continually want to fuss, cuss and discuss this issue.
Back to the beach.
Gilligan would have understood Walter
In the words of politicians - I apologize if you believe I am hyperpartisan.
The Minority Leader should have found at least one Republican to call for an additional investigation beyond the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (VDACS). VDACS is the regulatory agency for charities.
The delegate who received a donation then submitted legislation on behalf of the US Navy Vets that became law should have been persuaded by the Minority Leader to call for an investigation. That delegate, Democrat Ticer, has not in recent articles disclosed what she did with the campaign contribution.
It is not hyperpartisanship for pointing out wrong statements, false facts, and out right lies just because the laser pointer is on liberals. As there is no truth in beauty, it is easy to hear the voice in the crowd if that voice keeps calling out your "friends".
You Just Proved my Point
Firstly, any investigation of US Navy Vets in the Richmond scene would, of necessity, include persons of both parties who received donations from them, Democrat alike. Unfortunately, in your zeal, you seem to believe I want to exempt my 'friends' (your term, not mine). Please tell me who my 'friends' are so I will know to exempt next time.
Secondly, the charges were originally leveled against US Navy Vets and THEIR participation in the electoral process. Charges against any or all particular politicians are secondary. I still hope there will be some proof, exonerating the entire process and all the players. Without an investigation, there can be no exoneration, but maybe exoneration isn't the point of the hyperpartisans of either side.
Thirdly, I disagree. There is truth in beauty. Whenever I hear the music, bring out the bongos, I'm reminded there's something totally much more important than what goes on here, that there is a much greater truth than my limited understanding.
maynard
Vet Association
The BS of politics are smokescreens. Get rid of the illegitimate children who give all Veteran organizations a bad name. DO SOMETHING....
Unbelievable....
Two elected officials who apparently do not understand the roles of the various government agencies. Things like this is why we have the Office of the Attorney General (OAG). Their request needs to go to the OAG, not the Virginia State Police. Sheeze....
aog?,,,,,, some conflict of interest
AG Cucc has $55,000 he doesn't want to let go.