The Virginian-Pilot
©
Louisiana has become something of a second workplace to Jeffrey Breit the past few months. The Virginia Beach attorney represents hundreds of Gulf Coast fishermen whose livelihoods have been imperiled by the oil spill. Breit has a history in the region, having attended New Orleans' Tulane University for his undergraduate and legal studies. But his current practice there largely is a result of happenstance.
It began with a May 1 phone call from a fishing boat captain seeking Breit's help securing compensatory payments that BP had pledged to watermen whose earnings have been affected.
Breit happened to be in New Orleans to deliver a speech at a conference, and the skipper sought out the attorney because of his work representing menhaden fishermen in personal injury matters and contract disputes.
Believing he had agreed to help a few commercial anglers, Breit was surprised to learn that his name had been passed to 260 watermen. His client roster has continued to grow, he now represents more than 500 fishermen.
An estimated 27,000 people work in Louisiana's seafood industry, including nearly 11,200 with commercial fishing licenses, according to state statistics.
Now Breit's work on behalf of some of those watermen appears to have enhanced his public stature. His name popped up in national news stories this week detailing disputes between BP and fishermen over how and when payments are made.
Breit publicly chided BP for "arbitrarily, unilaterally changing the rules" of how people are paid after the company agreed to cut checks every month, while simultaneously running "a $50 million ad campaign about how they want to make it right."
"That is an absolute falsehood," said Breit, a partner in the firm Breit, Drescher, Imprevento & Walker, during a telephone interview Friday afternoon from the Gulf. "They are making this hard, squeezing people."
Lost-wage payments covering May and June have been made, Breit said. Those due in July have been delayed without explanation from the company, he added.
July payments are being processed, a BP spokesman told The Virginian-Pilot. However, the company has begun requiring more documentation from claimants to verify lost wages.
Without supporting evidence of past earnings, BP spokesman Max McGahan explained, the company will provide $1,000 payments to qualified individuals this month.
That policy won't continue into August, when documentation will be required to receive payment.
Initially, BP offered a monthly payment of $5,000 to boat captains and $2,500 to deckhands in the wake of the spill.
The evolving policy is designed to verify rightful recipients, not an attempt to shortchange people, McGahan said.
"We will pay everyone who has a legitimate claim," he said. "There is no ceiling."
So far, the company has spent more than $3 billion on cleanup, compensation and other costs associated with the spill. A company statement issued last week indicates BP has received more than 98,600 wage claims and paid out more than $153 million.
That money is separate from the $20 billion escrow fund the company has committed to establish to cover ongoing spill-related costs.
Julian Walker, (804) 697-1564, julian.walker@pilotonline.com

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo


Speaking from an informed perspective
Full disclosure: I am primarily a divorce lawyer in Richmond. I do some PI cases, but not much. I have known Jeffrey for probably 15 years and consider him a friend.
It is true that he is represnting these folks on a contingent fee basis. That means that they are not paying him an hourly fee, which I charge. Instead, he takes the risk that they will recover something and both he and the client benefit if they prevail. If they recover nothing, he gets nothing. Beyond that, he loses all of the costs that he advances on behalf of the client. Just out of curiousity, would you go to work tomorrow if your employer said that he "might" pay you, or required you to pay some money to him for the pleasure of going to work while offering only the hope that you "might" get it back, together with your wages? Not so attractive, is it?
The folks in the Gulf don't have the money to pay an hourly rate to a lawyer. So the lawyer takes a risk in hopes of making money on these deal. This is the definition of capitalism, people. Those who take big risks tend to have big rewards.
And to anyone who thinks that BP will pay a fair settlement to those who have lost their livlihoods as r
Advertising an ambulance chaser
Jeffrey Breit comes from a LONG line of ambulance chasing attorneys. He is one of the ones that gives all attorneys a bad name. You can bet he'll get his typical massive cut of any settlement that is reached, and he'll take that cut before his clients get their money. This article does Hampton Roads a great disservice by glorifying Breit and others of his ilk. He should be paying the VP for this fine advertising piece. Shame on the VP for even printing it.
Lawyers
Lawyers don't help others, lawyers help themselves.....
Out of the woodwork
BP is justified to request documentation in dispersing payouts to those rightfully deserving of them. This type of incident brings the vermin out of the woodwork to prey on the ill fortune of others. Hundreds of scam artists that were not even in New York during 9-11 filed claims in an effort to subvert the system and enrich themselves. This illegal and unethical activity steals money from the true victims of these events.
What lawyers Do
He is just doing what lawyers do. Lawyers help people. They help people who are injured in an accident. At least that what the ads say. But what about the guy who caused the accident? He has to have a lawyer too. Why is it that his lawyer never advertises? No lawyer advertised, we help the guy who caused the accident.
One third plus expenses
Do they not realize that they will lose over one-third plus expenses of any money awarded to their "attorney"? Involving lawyers will most likely retard the process and tie up the compensation plan in the courts for years. Sadly, the only winners here are the lawyers.
I See Now
So when hard working common folk, who do not have the resources & legal power of a multi-national corporation, one who has destroyed their community, hire someone to represent their interests, it’s considered a scam? How far will BP apologists go? It’s called TAKING RESPONSIBILITY. OUR Gulf is crippled, our citizens hurting. Where does your loyalty lie?
If this disaster had happened to VB, I doubt there would be the same reactions. If our beaches were drenched in oil, if our home values sank & if our fishing & tourism industry were obliterated, I guarantee that the tune would change. But since this is remote & no heartache in our backyard, then it is just "greedy scammers" who are affected. Sleep tight in your self-righteous beds, secure in the knowledge that if it happened here, you would get your just due & it is just others who get shafted. The corporate masters will take care of you.
Kelly, Kelly
Obviously you have never had the luxury of being exposed to the hypocrisy of the court system. The POINT of the posts is that those "hard working common folk" are not the ones that will benefit from Breit's representation. Breit and Breit's firm will benefit the most from said convenient trip that was Breit's fate. PLEASE. I think you watch too many commercials !
How about waiting a bit
Is there any indication that BP is not paying legitimate claims without the need for lawsuits?
Once you bring in a lawyer, 1/3 to 1/2 of the settlement will be consumed by contingent attorney fees.
So, if BP pays my claim fairly (my family has beach property for sale which has lost value) or even close to fairly, I am better off settling myself.
It would seem, unless BP changes its practices, that the only people needing an attorney would be those seeking money they are not due.
Taxes
I believe that BP should ask for the Tax returns of the people that are filing claims for the money they claim they are losing!, Every fisherman,crabber,rest.,bar,etc. The big problem is that a large % of them have been working under the table and not filing taxes!. Which means that they have been cheating the rest of the taxpayers!. As far as Breitt is concerned he will probably ask that all his cases in Va. be continued so he can work in La. He will probably hire John Edwards to assist him??