©
By Michael Sluss
RICHMOND
Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli has decided to give away $55,500 in campaign contributions he received last year from the director of a veterans charity organization that is under investigation in Virginia and several other states.
Cuccinelli's decision comes after two months of controversy and unanswered questions about the activities of the U.S. Navy Veterans Association and its mysterious director, Bobby Thompson.
Thompson, who most recently resided in Tampa, Fla., was the second-largest individual donor to the Republican attorney general's 2009 campaign. He also gave $12,500 to other Virginia elected officials last year, including $5,000 to Gov. Bob McDonnell's campaign.
McDonnell and three legislators who received contributions from Thompson announced plans to donate those funds to charity in May, shortly after The Roanoke Times published a story detailing the U.S. Navy Vets' efforts to gain an exemption from certain charitable solicitation reporting requirements. Virginia's consumer affairs agency has since opened an investigation of the association and at least six other states have launched probes about how the group spent millions in reported donations.
Cuccinelli was criticized by Democrats for holding on to contributions from Thompson after McDonnell and other politicians gave up their donations. Cuccinelli announced last month that he would put $55,500 in a separate, restricted account pending the outcome of the state's investigation.
But when Thompson's own lawyers told an Ohio judge earlier this month that they could not find their client, it became apparent that Thompson had chosen not to defend himself, Cuccinelli said.
"We were practicing the principle of presumed innocence with Bobby Thompson, awaiting proof from law enforcement that the money he had given the campaign was either a legitimate donation or was not his to give," Cuccinelli said in a prepared statement. "With Mr. Thompson's recent disappearance... it seems that he does not wish to defend himself or the U.S. Navy Veterans Association. Because of this, I chose to divest my campaign of any funds associated with Mr. Thompson."
Cuccinelli's political team reached out to Virginia veterans over the past week to determine how they can put the funds to use for veterans and their families.
"We want to make sure we do this whole process right," said Noah Wall, Cuccinelli's political director. "We're looking at a whole lot of options."
House Minority Leader Ward Armstrong, D-Henry County, said public pressure drove Cuccinelli to give up the funds.
"It would have been nice if he had come to this conclusion because it's the right thing to do, not because of public pressure," Armstrong said.
Armstrong last month asked McDonnell to put the state police in charge of investigating U.S. Navy Vets without involving the attorney general's office. Cuccinelli's office could become involved in the state's investigation if legal action is required.
Thompson abandoned his rented Tampa duplex earlier this year after the St. Petersburg Times questioned him for a series of stories that raised questions about the legitimacy of the U.S. Navy Vets group and what happened to the money it raised.
Wall said he talked briefly to Thompson by phone in mid-June, when Cuccinelli's political team was trying to determine whether Thompson's donations to the campaign came from personal funds. Wall said he did not ask where Thompson was at the time and has not talked to him since.
Thompson made three separate donations to Cuccinelli's campaign last year. The first two were unsolicited. Cuccinelli has said that he received a $50,000 contribution after calling Thompson to request another donation but did not believe he asked for such a large sum.
The St. Petersburg Times stories were published in March, shortly after Virginia's General Assembly passed legislation that could allow the group to gain an exemption from annual registration requirements under the state's charitable-solicitation law.
After learning of the stories, state Sen. Patsy Ticer, D-Alexandria, who sponsored the bill, asked aides in McDonnell's office to veto it. McDonnell's staff said Ticer's concerns weren't communicated to the governor before he signed the bill.

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo



yes but...
did he ever ACTUALLY donate the money? All I ever see is that he will do it but not yet . enough already.
He did the right thing?
There are some thing's even a SSSSSnake would not do!Much less the STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL!
what's new?
These things happens to both parties. Cuccinelli did the right thing.
But enjoy taking your potshots, dem hypocrites. You make me laugh.
The campaign rules, like
The campaign rules, like taxes, are so complicated who could not make a mistake?
The conflict of interest is
The conflict of interest is not a matter of complicated campaign rules, but rather the difference between right and wrong. The governor realized it long ago, and so should Cuccinelli.
conflict?
He accepted the money before allegations of wrongdoing. The state police, not the AG, is in charge of the investigation. Where is the conflict?
I suppose politicians should be able to see into the future? Or only those on the other side of the aisle. You kill me. Obama should have never accepted those contributions from Goldman Sachs and BP during the 2008 campaign. Such a conflict of interest! How dare he?!! (See, I knew you wouldn't hold him to the same standard!!)
Before allegations of
Before allegations of wrongdoing - yes. However, months after the governor remedied the improper contribution. No need to look into the future. Nice try.
Washington Post, June 29,
Washington Post, June 29, 2010: "Sen. Patsy Ticer (D-Alexandria), who had carried a bill at the group's request to exempt veterans organizations from annual state charity registration requirements, said she has pledged the $1,000 she received from Thompson to the Alexandria chapter of Healthy Families, a group that sponsors home visits for at-risk families to help prevent child abuse and neglect."
-----------------
Ms. TICER took money AND sponsored a bill from an Organization that she knew "nothing" about! Why is that OK? Where is her blame?
AG Cuccinelli gets criticized for "everything" he does even if it is something for the good of the people of Virginia!
"Ms. TICER took money AND sponsored"
Bob Mcd took money AND approved the bill.
The primary difference is
The primary difference is that this $55,000 most probably represents the largest single contribution to Cuccinelli's campaign. This is not to condone Sen. Tice's delay in making her charitable contribution. However, your effort to deflect the issue is basically a "two wrongs do not make a right" argument. The magnitude of the issue speaks for itself as to why primary attention has been focused on the attorney general. It is clearly not a matter of the matter of the media's inattention to the smaller contribution - as your quote from the Washington Post reflects. Their focus, however, is most likely due to the proximity of Sen. Tice to the northern Virginia area.