75°
forecast

Federal officials file suit to get Granby Tower site in Norfolk

Posted to: News Norfolk

NORFOLK

Federal officials filed a condemnation lawsuit on Thursday to claim the site of the failed Granby Tower project and will take ownership of the property as soon as today.

They deposited $6,175,000 with the federal court, saying that's the worth of the property according to a private appraisal, attorney Joe Waldo said.

Waldo, who represents Granby Tower developer Buddy Gadams, said he will contest the amount offered but can't contest the lawsuit itself.

The federal government plans to use the site for a $104.7 million expansion of the Walter E. Hoffman Courthouse, which it hopes will open in 2013.

Granby Tower would have been at the intersection of Granby Street and Brambleton Avenue, across Granby from the courthouse.

Federal officials also filed to claim a smaller, adjacent property on York Street owned by Raj Randeria, a Norfolk hotel developer. Randeria had planned to build a 15-story Hampton Inn on the site.

Randeria could not be reached Thursday. He said months ago he expected the federal government to offer about $1.1 million for the property. Federal officials indicate they will use both sites to build the annex.

Gadams said the government has offered him $1 million less than what he owes on the mortgage with Bank of the Commonwealth.

"I have many times over" that amount invested in the project, he said. "The federal government has been stalking me for five years. They put this project under a dark cloud, and we were never able to get out from underneath it."

Waldo said Gadams could have sold the project for far more than $6.2 million to a developer. Utilities have been installed, as were hundreds of pilings that would have formed the foundation for Granby Tower.

Waldo said he expects to file papers next week contesting the government's offer. "I believe that the courts will treat me fairly," Gadams said.

Gadams proposed building the 34-story, $180.5 million Granby Tower in 2004. The 327-unit condominium project would have been the city's tallest building and jump-started efforts to extend downtown to the north.

But in 2005, as Gadams prepared to begin selling condos, the federal government threatened to take the site for a courthouse expansion. Construction was delayed for nearly a year while Gadams, Norfolk city officials and the city's congressional delegation fought the federal plans.

The government relented, and construction began in the summer of 2007. But with the economy slumping and the condominium boom cooling, Gadams lost his financing and construction halted.

Gadams ceased efforts to acquire new financing last October, when he received a letter from the federal government announcing its intent to seize the property.

"Essentially, what the government did is shoot the buffalo, follow it and wait until it fell," Waldo said.

General Services Administration public affairs officer Gina Blyther Gilliam issued a statement late Thursday.

"GSA is working closely with local city planners to turn the site into a welcoming public space until construction begins," she wrote.

Mayor Paul Fraim said that "it's a welcome turn of events" if the government builds the annex. But he said Norfolk officials have heard nothing from the GSA, either about sprucing up the Granby Tower site or about the design of the annex.

Although the city has no legal say in how the courthouse annex is designed, federal law requires the GSA to consult with city officials, Fraim said.

"The spirit of the law is that they're supposed to try to build a building that fits within the fabric of the structures downtown and with our zoning ordinances," he said. "We hope they will do that."

Pilot writer Tim McGlone contributed to this report.

Harry Minium, (757) 446-2371, harry.minium@pilotonline.com

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

Federal Courthouse

Everybody knows that the present Federal Courhouse is oversized. Vast areas of the building are unoccupied and/or unused. I think one floor is closed up. I assume that the ne building is planned to be a 21st century government palace that we, the peasants, may only enter after having been properly searched and asked to state our business. Maybe even have to produce our "pepers." I say, let them make do with what they have, like the rest of us.

This is nothing more than

This is nothing more than theft. Add to that the land will never be taxed, and the banks and private investors involved will all suffer a loss which affects us all. Apparently the government is not really concerned with those of us at the street level. Well, not when it interferes with them getting a better price on a piece of land. I too think Gaddams mismanaged this site bit that does not make it ok to steal it from him.

I wonder who he voted for?

No No No.......................

We need that hole to bury all the Light Rails Trains in a few years!

A solution?

I think this would be fair to all. The Feds pay Gaddams the amount of the mortgages, and the value of the pilings they will need to build the courthouse.

The Feds build a courthouse, not an annex, a structure large enough to fit the needs on that site.

Once the Feds build the building and move in, they SELL the old courthouse to Gaddams, he can then do what he does well, develop or re-develop.

The banks come out whole, and WE don't have to make them whole through bailout money. Gaddams is out a lot of his money, but maybe not bankrupt. And then Mayor Fraim can have it both ways, for the Feds, as stated in today's paper, which is the opposite of what he wanted when Gaddams had Granby Tower under way, and for the new development down the road.

As explained on another

As explained on another forum, the pilings that were driven are to the specifications of the engineering design for the Granby Tower building. They vary from design to design. So if anything, they might be more in the way.

Also, does federal building pay taxes? This might be a loose for Norfolk.

Also, why am I moderated? I tried to post the other day and used a censored word, but corrected it.

Also, the old courthouse and new one are supposed to be connected IIRC. They aren't getting rid of the old one, they are adding on. Gov't only gets bigger, not smaller.

I don't know Gaddams or

I don't know Gaddams or Marathon, and have only talked to Marathon for a short minute about some commercial property.

There was a drive by posting on another forum from a non-regular that said something to the effect of the idea of the condos was just to drive the value of the land higher all along. Just like people buying property in the way of ODUs expansion, this persons theory was that the whole GT was just a move to up the value of the land to sell to the gubbmint. I don't know if I buy this, given the effort put forth to build the sales pavilion (where you could experience the fact that the $400,000 condo indeed does fit in a trailer.)

It's just something to ponder. That's part of the RE game right? Buy property that richer people might want so they have to buy it from you for an elevated price.

I'm not saying it's the case here, it was just an interesting odd viewpoint.

I remember the Pilot article where all the young people who had bought were interviewed. They were all mortgage brokers. I think I called it out in the comment box they'd be unable to pay once the RE market crashed. They were drinking their own kool-aid, so to say. Remember that?

I don't thin

Check the history

If you look at the entire timeline; beginning with the notice the prior landowner had, the hypothetical is far more then that. Pilot never did that investigation however. The information seems to support it

No More Empty Lots!!

I don't care who or what they build there, as long as there isn't a large empty lot sitting there!!! However, if they do build a new courthouse, I hope and pray they build enough parking spaces for everyone!!!!

Norfolk backed Gadams to the end

Mayor Fraim backed Buddy Gadams even after it was obvious that there was no financial backing for his project. Most financial institutions saw that there was no market for a condo project like this and declined to support loans for Granby Towers. I am sure that the city coughed up all kinds of money for infrastructure support for this project. The Feds backed off of taking the land when the city whined that they had plans for it. Now it is an empty mud hole and many contractors were bilked out of money for work they did on the site. Gadams should be banned from any more city sponsored projects, however it has been reported that he is going to build a development in Ocean View and the city is actually considering support for his project. Nothing ever changes with Norfolk city council.

Actually, that site would

Actually, that site would make a great go-kart track. Wait, downtown already IS a go-kart track!

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: News rss feed   



Toolbox