©
When state officials talk about reforming local government, they usually mean cutting financial support while shoving more responsibilities onto cities and counties. As state budgets have gotten smaller, the complaint line at City Hall has gotten longer. That's not reform; it's abdication.
In assembling his government-reform commission, Gov. Bob McDonnell wisely created a panel to look at the relationship between state and local governments and find ways to help them work together more effectively. Norfolk Mayor Paul Fraim was chosen to lead this important group.
Many of the recommendations will focus on internal administrative tasks such as eliminating duplicate functions and improving customer service. Those goals are low-hanging fruit that can be accomplished in the short time McDonnell has provided in order to hold a special session this fall.
But the governor has also promised to pursue longer-range reforms that demand more careful thought. He should make sure the panel on regional issues has more time and support to flesh out meaningful improvements.
The group was dubbed the "intergovernmental relations committee," not the regionalism committee. "Regionalism" has long been a bad word in Virginia. But regionalism is the key to the state's future. Norfolk is no longer competing in a vacuum against individual cities around the country for jobs, federal grants or the most talented science teachers. Fewer and fewer people live and work in the same municipality, especially in the largest urban areas.
Hampton Roads competes with other urban areas, with other regions elsewhere in the nation and the world. But regions in Virginia were designed to fail. The commonwealth's system of independent cities creates disincentives for partnership.
The state's rigid adherence to the Dillon Rule - which requires local governments to get permission from the legislature to do virtually anything, including such mundane matters as increasing dog and cat fees or pedestrian ordinances - prevents mayors and supervisors from finding ways to provide public services and end expensive duplication.
The government reform commission is unlikely to recommend a wholesale rejection of those hoary doctrines. Indeed, McDonnell reiterated his support for the Dillon Rule at the group's first meeting this summer.
But the commission could move Virginia closer to the 21st century by chipping away at a fossilized structure that leaves Hampton Roads lumbering behind more fleet-footed and collaborative communities like Charlotte, Portland and Seattle.
Virginia has experimented with reform with varying degrees of success. A commission established by former Gov. Mills Godwin created today's system of regional planning districts. Former House Speaker Tom Moss formed a panel that urged modernization of the state's tax system. A subsequent tax confab spent two years pondering its options but failed to reach consensus.
The leader of that endeavor was a delegate named Bob McDonnell. Now it's his challenge to avoid another episode of Death by Minutia. McDonnell needs to give local governments tools that will allow them to share revenues, pool purchasing power, jointly develop industrial sites and mental health facilities, and cooperate on land use and strategic planning.
Imagine what Virginia communities could accomplish if they were judged by their collective performance, and not by their individual compliance with a dusty volume of bureaucratic rules.
It will take a leader with vision and courage to explain to the public why this issue is important and to shepherd it past those who insist that the state maintain a death grip on the status quo. If McDonnell truly wants to reshape and revitalize government in Virginia, this is the second chance most leaders never get. He should make it count.

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo

Confused-
I'm just a country boy, and don't understand. Aren't the people who are saying the Dillon rule is good for business the same ones who insist that the Gov't should stay out of private business? Or is that only on other people's business? Or just when it benefits "me"? Would someone explain this to me?
Time for change
Years ago, the Legislature authorized the local governments in Hampton Roads to cooperate and share responsibility for the creation of mega business parks like the Research Triangle so we could compete for these projects as route 460 was improved and rail service was enhanced. There was even a chance that an expanded international airport serving Richmond and Hampton Roads could be created there. Of course, Governor Gilmore vetoed the Bill, claiming there was the chance of a back door tax increase. The damage done to our potential by the neanderthals like Gilmore continues to this day as the legacy of hatred of governmetn and taxes continues. In the meantime, states that think and plan ahead clean our clocks on mega projects.
HB 1474 - forever Gov. Gilmore should be resepcted for this veto
Pursuant to Section 6 of Article V of the Constitution of Virginia, I veto House Bill No. 1474. HB 1474 allows two or more localities to create a Regional Economic Development Authority to develop, own and operate for those localities, one or more development areas for commercial enterprises. [...] These steps, however, should not involve a delegation of taxing authority, or the creation of an undefined tax district, which is what HB 1474 purports to do. I believe that there is a model of regional cooperation that will allow these efficiencies to provide the regions of the Commonwealth the tools they need to compete nationally for high paying jobs and investments. [...] While HB 1474 takes some important steps in creating the proper economic incentives for collaboration between regions, unfortunately, it also blurs the distinction between regional governments and regional authorities, potentially creating an unelected entity with the critical sovereign powers of government. Therefore, I am returning this bill without my approval. - Gov. Gilmore - THANK YOU!
Agreed. Sounds like the
Agreed. Sounds like the forerunner of HRTA doesn't it.
Good Point...
The Dillon rule should be eliminated. The regions in this country that perform the best do so in an environment where they determine what is best suited for their oft-times unique circumstances. This archaic rule is holding back Virginia regions because it relies too heavily on the central legislature to do anything, and as we all know politics in Richmond stink to you know where. Why should a delegate from outside a particular region have any say on what another region wants to do that effects only the region in question? Keeping the Dillon rule in place while trying to maximize regional performance is like trying to get a runner to perform better while shackling his ankles with weights. Go to Home Rule like most other states in the country. It will free the localities up to do what they agree is best without outside interference.
Dillon's Rule protects our rights
Without Dillon's Rule, cities would be free to enact a patchwork of traffic and firearms laws which would make driving across Tidewater a nightmare of conflicting regulations.
With Norfolk's history of ignoring State law on preemption, it clearly cannot be trusted to respect our rights.
Dillon's Rule protects us from abuse by localities much as the 14th Amendment protects us from abuses by the States.
Uh...
I have lived in a couple home rule states and had absolutely no problems getting around traffic issues. In fact the traffic was better in the last state I lived in than in this region of this state. As for firearms laws, under home rule the state can pass a statewide law that all localities must follow. If a locality feels the law (or any other state law) infringes on its rights it can take it to the courts. As for Norfolk, if that is the case than this sounds like an enforcement issue that is being ignored due to politics-most likely.
Patchwork of Regulations
Dr. T., is your concern for patchwork regulations something that is happening in other states that are not jurisdictionally crippled by the Dillon's Rule? If so, I've not heard much about it.
Current laws were passed under dillon's rule
Laws written specifying pre-emption would not be affected, but much of Virginia's law was written with the presumption of Dillon's rule applying. All those laws would have to be passed again.
I opened a dental practice in Norfolk, with the understanding that there were limits on the kinds of taxes and level of taxation that could be applied. Norfolk already taxes businesses at the highest rate State law allows, were they freed of those restrictions, the fools that get elected here might tax every small business out of existence.
In the end, businesses would simply relocate to cities where taxation was reasonable, but the turmoil and lost investment of the change would ruin many small businessmen.
If you think inner cities are in decline now, just wait and see what happens if the limits on taxation of business are removed.
Another libertarian stumbles
Am I to understand that now centralized government good. I thought libertarians wanted little government, now there is a liber4tarian supporting central government planning. There is a lot flip flopping going on now a days.