74°
forecast

A needed change in Portsmouth

Posted to: Editorials Opinion

There's no cause for celebration this morning in Portsmouth. There wasn't going to be, regardless of whether voters decided to remove Mayor James Holley from office or let him serve out his term.

It's been a sad affair, from start to finish. And, regrettably, it's been divisive. And a diversion from the problems that Portsmouth must solve.

As Holley departs the mayor's office, the challenge is for city officials and residents to move past their differences over his fate and return their focus to a common goal - rebuilding Portsmouth's leadership together.

In recent years, the mayor has been too often a distraction - enough, voters decided Tuesday, to warrant removing him from office for the second time in his career.

There's no mistaking the will of Portsmouth's people; more turned out Tuesday to cast a vote against Holley than voted in the general election for the City Council and School Board in May. Voters ousted the mayor by more than a 2-1 margin.

City Council members now need to heed that mandate and take the lead in bringing overdue reconciliation to Portsmouth, both in their neighborhoods and among themselves.

A year ago, council members were unanimous in their request for Holley to retire. This month, however, that sense of unity frayed as they fought over who should be vice mayor, a role that became increasingly important as Holley's behavior became more erratic and the recall vote neared.

A split vote over the appointment exposed the obvious but the unspoken: People were already jockeying for position to succeed Holley.

Politics will now proceed, as politics will. But council members would be wise to remember that, whatever their aspirations, they'll be judged by the city's progress in coming months and by their role in helping the city recover from a difficult year.

Further divisiveness won't go unnoticed, or unpunished by voters.

When they meet today to discuss Holley's interim replacement, who will serve until a special election in November, they should focus on finding someone with experience in city government and, just as importantly, a capacity to bring together all sides of the recall effort.

If the interim mayor is chosen from the council, members will need to identify someone with similar qualities to serve out the term of the departing council member.

As for Holley, now is the moment, at last, for a graceful exit.

In his lifetime, he has given much to his beloved Portsmouth. He helped topple a racist power structure that gripped the city for decades, and he helped spread new opportunities to all corners of the city.

The freshest memories, for a while, will be what led to this recall: that Holley ignored the advice of colleagues to step down following accusations by a former aide.

Holley's legacy, in time, seems likely to weather this storm.

Portsmouth certainly will.

But how long it will take Portsmouth to recover from the turmoil of the past year depends on a council able to put the city's interests ahead of politics - and on the willingness of residents to find common ground on which to rebuild their city.

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

Elect pols based on merit not color

Is it racist to vote for a candidate because of his race? I say yes. Black candidates don't seem to need a platform or qualifications. They just need to have a majority black voter base. Bad politicians get elected/reelected based upon color resulting in worse than useless individuals being elected. Examples of this are Charlie Rangel, Ray Nagin, Obama, Waters and locally Holley. They can do no wrong in the eyes of their black electorate and thus stay in office to the detriment of us all.

"Racial lines"

mike: Majority black districts supported Holley, majority white districts voted to recall him. Thus the inference that the vote went along racial lines.

I dont understand

How could voting be across racial lines. Did someone keep track of the color of voters as they entered polling places and simply figured that whites voted against holley and blacks for him?

The People Get The Representation They Deserve.

The voting was entirely split down racial lines. The black community did not want the mayor recalled. Shades of D.C. Let's not talk about it.............

RACISM and elections

Is it racist to vote for a candidate because of his race? I say yes. Black candidates don't seem to need a platform or qualifications. They just need to have a majority black voter base. Bad politicians get elected/reelected based upon color resulting in worse than useless individuals being elected. Examples of this are Charlie Rangel, Ray Nagin, Obama, Waters and locally Holley. They can do no wrong in the eyes of their black electorate and thus stay in office to the detriment of us all.

Hooray for the The Pilot Editorial Board!

The crusade they championed so relentlessly came to fruition!

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: Editorials rss feed    Opinion rss feed   


Toolbox