The Virginian-Pilot
©
PORTSMOUTH
If Bernard Griffin Sr. doesn't get the nod to be the city's next mayor, he at least brought some levity to the City Council's selection process Monday night.
The former vice mayor, who left office in 2004, is one of four people who will be considered when the council votes tonight on a temporary replacement for James Holley.
In a public interview, Councilman Bill Moody Jr. asked Griffin to describe the ideal mayor. An audience of about 75 awaited the answer.
Griffin hesitated, then responded with a smile. His answer drew laughter,
"I could be boastful and say Bernard Griffin Sr.".
The decision rests with the six council members, two of whom are seeking the appointment: Vice Mayor Charles B. Whitehurst Sr. and Councilwoman Elizabeth Psimas.
The public interview session went fast. The four council members not seeking the appointment sat in seats facing the audience, a chair and a table with a microphone. One by one, Psimas, Whitehurst and Griffin entered the chambers to answer the same eight questions, including,
Why are you interested in the post?
Describe your volunteer work.
How has your experience prepared you to be mayor?
What would you like to accomplish?
Griffin was done in 14 minutes, Psimas in eight and Whitehurst in seven.
Psimas said anybody can lead a meeting or cut a ribbon, but Portsmouth needs a mayor who will be respected at the regional table. She said she hopes to get the appointment and then run for the position when it comes up for a special election on Nov. 2.
"It's fine to talk about healing, but we can't afford to have a placeholder that allows us to lose traction," Psimas said.
Like Psimas, Whitehurst would lose his current seat if he were appointed mayor, making it likely that he would also run for mayor in November in order to stay on the council.
He mentioned his service in the Marines and described himself as a leader who tries to carefully prepare for a decision, "and then step across the line boldly."
"Difficult, I can do immediately," he said. "Impossible takes a little longer."
Griffin said the city seemed to be divided in the aftermath of the July 13 recall of Holley. He said his experience as a former School Board member and council member can help reunite residents. He added that he was interested only in the interim appointment.
"I don't think my wife would permit me to go beyond a three-month period," he said, drawing chuckles.
The City Council privately culled a large list of potential appointees down to four finalists. The fourth, Bishop Curtis E. Edmonds Sr., could not make the interviews Monday because of a previously scheduled trip.
The council members met for about 45 minutes in closed session after the interviews and plan to vote at the end of tonight's council meeting, which begins at 7 p.m.
Dave Forster, (757) 446-2627, dave.forster@pilotonline.com

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo

Again I challenge a council
Again I challenge a council person to bring forward a policy for council where ALL current under develop or undeveloped parcels have a city staffer assigned to them to make sure we are taking every opportunity to advertise that property. Ive heard far too many stories of folks interested in certain city owned properties not having calls returned or being treated rudely.
All of us are tired of seeing certain properties go undeveloped or abandoned. It's high time we get the ball rolling on selling of these albatross's........I understand we want to attract business or development in line with vision principles.......but at some point folks we HAVE GOT TO get these properties BACK ON the tax rolls. We have to push to get the holiday in site back in gear......Cradock's issues addressed and the old I.C. Norcom site developed ASAP.
Don't be doublecrossed (again) by Psimas
Fellow women voters - don’t be bamboozled. Her issues are not yours.
African-American voters, you already know she can't never win a proper election where she would need a majority of your votes to prevail. Racial healing will be impossible with Queen Elizabeth!
Psimas supporters, she will double-cross you - again.
Crowning Queen Elizabeth will guarantee this city’s shameful legacy of double-dealing good ole boy, crony-serving, arrogant, but incompetent “leaders." Those good folks who have brought you the region’s highest taxes, worst schools, highest crime and a historic district most likely to be completely underwater – soon.
Crowning Queen Elizabeth is the worst choice you could make.
I disagree with your
I disagree with your assertions........as much as I dislike the "good ol boy" network I dont feel that Elizabeth is connected with or represents that niche of Portsmouth politics......Im not sure why you do nor is it probably any of my business....
regardless of how UNPOPULAR YOU think Elizabeth is ME and MY FAMILY WILL continue to support Elizabeth as a council candidate, mayoral candidate AND regional representative.
Elizabeth is 100% correct when she says PORTSMOUTH needs serious representation at the regional table......the reason PORTSMOUTH has many of the issues we have had is due to lack of STRONG leadership.
FEMALE VOTERS,AFRICAN AMERICAN VOTERS,NEW VOTERS and just those looking forward to a resurgence of PORTSMOUTH support ELIZABETH PSIMAS.....strong leadership for PORTSMOUTH......FOR A CHANGE
we need legitimate candidates
Our next mayor needs to be someone without self-serving business arrangements inside the city, opposed to the back-room deals Holley and some of the other council members like to employ and capable of re-envisioning Portsmouth's future through the lens of fiscal responsibility.
I don't see any of that in this group, but I am hopeful for November.
Just out of curiosity when
Just out of curiosity when you mention Portsmouth's Fiscal responsibility..... how pray tel do you recommend attaining that WITHOUT having private-public partnerships........EVERY successful municipality draws on experienced businesspersons to help lead and design the blueprints for the city/town.
So many try to paint relationships that councilpersons or developers have with each other as an evil?.......really......so instead your recommendation is to have leaders from ? sector? religion?.....and you expect anyone to believe that those running for office dont already have their own relationships with those we may find questionable maybe even detestable? Portsmouth citizens in November need to vote with their heads AND their hearts.......its easy to be visceral and point fingers.....
If you want religious leaders heading our city just visit the POKER stories in Portsmouth.....the LAST thing we need are more folks in government concerned more with morals than the fiscal health,business health and viability of OUR city.
More of the same will just give us more of what we have
Public-private partnerships in Portsmouth just mean the taxpayers foot the bill for another ill-fated business flop. Fiscal responsibility would mean the city government getting out of money-losing public enterprises such as its redundant golf courses and hotels, Willet Hall and nTelos Pavilion. Our tax dollars are better spent on we Portsmouth residents, not the people that come to town for concerts or 18 holes.
I do agree that a history as a successful businessperson would be ideal for a council member. Now, if their businesses are in other cities, where their votes can't directly affect their bottom line, that would be fine, but members of council with vested concerns in businesses their votes directly affect are in a conflict of interest, period.
I disagree that
I disagree that Private-Public partnerships COST taxpayers.....I can give you 5 examples that have worked. I think the issue is less with that method and more with the oversight of the project that follows. Seems that the leadership in Portsmouth has done a fine job of starting the program......the issues arise once they walk away......we have to do a better job of holding the developers accountable and doing things similar to VDOT. If a developer doesn't meet certain timeline goals or expectations then their fined......require a suitable bond to be put into place for future projects and require and dedicate city staff to oversee each project throughout its phases. That staff member would be responsible for that parcel,project or development.
With regards to businesspeople not serving in their city of business....I disagree.....Ide love to see a Bob Aston on council......clearly EVERY council member has the ability to recuse themselves from a vote and have a city attorney on which to draw on for conclusions of conflict.
Another special election?
What happens if one of the sitting members of council is appointed to the job and therefore loses his or her seat? Will there have to be another special election to fill that now-vacant seat?
All this for a 3-month appointment. They hope to run in the special election as the "incumbent."
The ideal scenario is this: Psimas or Whitehurst gets the appointment then loses in November, ending a political career.
One can dream.
Kindest regards,
Pb
Did you read the article?
The answer to your question lies within.