72°
forecast

Traffic D: Where Beach conflict-of-interest cases go

Posted to: News Virginia Beach

VIRGINIA BEACH

Welcome to Traffic D.

It's a courtroom where cases that could pose a conflict of interest for the city's General District Court judges are heard about once a month.

Lawyers, a police sergeant and a judge involved in legal action of their own have appeared there recently. A former mayor's husband was there last week.

Like other courtrooms, the proceedings are public. But unlike similar venues, there was no docket posted outside Traffic D on June 30, when such cases were being heard. Those matters showed up on dockets outside other courtrooms.

And even a former substitute judge whose case was being heard in Traffic D didn't know she was supposed to be there.

Cases get assigned to the conflict docket after they are vetted by court officials.

General District Court Clerk Andre H. Mayfield said he makes recommendations that go before the General District Court judges about cases that could pose a conflict. Prosecutors also inform the clerk's office when they are seeking a special prosecutor in a case because of a potential conflict.

Once Mayfield hears back from the judges, he requests that the Virginia Supreme Court designate a substitute judge, he said. He said signs were posted on courtroom doors that conflict cases would be heard in Traffic D and that the transfer of cases was announced in court.

Norfolk-based attorney Mary G. Commander, who used to serve as a substitute judge in Virginia Beach, said she was never told that her case was going to be heard in Traffic D.

"I had no idea they had a separate courtroom where they hear conflict cases," Commander said.

She had been sued by a former client and the matter had been continued several times, she said. On June 30, she went to the courthouse looking to get the case dismissed.

She found her name on a docket outside another courtroom and waited for her case to be heard. There was no announcement that her case had been transferred, she said.

Meanwhile, in Traffic D, Retired Judge Merlin M. Renne heard the case. Because Commander wasn't there, Renne entered a default judgment against her for $5,000 - the amount her former client had sought.

Mayfield acknowledged that dockets may not always list the correct courtroom and that he didn't know whether a sign was on the door of the courtroom Commander was originally in.

"I wish I could say that every system in the world is foolproof," Mayfield said.

Other people who had matters in Traffic D that day did know where to go.

Virginia Beach Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court Judge Randall M. Blow came to the courtroom as a plaintiff and obtained a $3,800 judgment against a tenant who hadn't paid his rent.

Joshua B. Shapiro, who has filed several lawsuits in the court system over the years - and once got a circuit judge's ruling reversed at the Virginia Supreme Court level - represented himself on several matters. Renne ruled in favor of the defendant in one case and another was continued.

Virginia Beach attorney Mark A. Andrews was convicted of first-offense drunken driving and hit-and-run.

And former Mayor Meyera Oberndorf's husband, Roger, appeared on a dog barking charge.

Renne deferred that matter for a year, ruling that the charge would be dismissed if there were no other dog barking citations against Oberndorf in the meantime.

Jen McCaffery, (757) 222-5119, jen.mccaffery@pilotonline.com

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

imagine that!!!

a lawyer that admits she doesn't know how the courts work! I don't think I'd hire her.

Barking Dog

what kind of conflick of interest would a ex mayors husband have with the court system, just a way to bypass the system for the Rich and Famous is what this sounds like! It sounds like the Clerk of Court does not believe that a Judge can be unbiased in his decisions??? Maybe the clerk should walk the hall on court day and see if his workers are doing there job?? Is there grounds for appeal to these people since they were not properly notified?? Maybe a suit against the clerk for failing to properly perform his job?? Or will it be another case of Cover up??

Barking Dog

what kind of conflick of interest would a ex mayors husband have with the court system, just a way to bypass the system for the Rich and Famous is what this sounds like! It sounds like the Clerk of Court does not believe that a Judge can be unbiased in his decisions??? Maybe the clerk should walk the hall on court day and see if his workers are doing there job?? Is there grounds for appeal to these people since they were not properly notified?? Maybe a suit against the clerk for failing to properly perform his job?? Or will it be another case of Cover up??

conflict

It is not the parties that have a conflict; it is the judges who have conflicts or the appearance of conflicts. Contrary to popular belief, attorneys are held to much higher ethical and conflict of interest standards than many professions (not that we don't all have our bad apples). Canon 2: A Judge shall avoid impropriety and the appearance of impropriety...

This article is about those people who have such a close relationship with the entire panel of regularly sitting judges that they are sent before a temporary judge, which temp judge does not have the same conflict. Normal conflicts...as in, I get a ticket and the assigned judge is my former law partner...those just get sent next door to another regularly sitting (not temp) judge. Happens all the time.

Serious?

What a travesty of justice.

Oh boom! An attorney loses

Oh boom! An attorney loses a case because she wasn't notified of the location of the hearing, and was therefore unable to defend herself.

Not that this particular attorney is guilty of this, or anything, but other attorneys have tried that on me before... lying about having served papers, serving papers late, or serving papers with incorrect information about where and when to appear.

Once that happens, it's done, and there's no recourse.

Maybe now, this victim will work to have the law changed so that these abuses of the civil court system will stop.

No recourse?

"Once that happens, it's done, and there's no recourse."

That isn't true. (1) You have an automatic right of appeal, and, (2) You can file a motion for rehearing.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: News rss feed   



Toolbox