The Virginian-Pilot
©
VIRGINIA BEACH
Offenders who don't pay restitution for their crimes might not get sent back to jail, but they could see a sheriff's deputy show up and claim their bed - or have their wages garnisheed.
The city has instituted a new approach to collecting the money. City Treasurer John Atkinson's office goes after restitution for new cases coming out of the Beach's Circuit, General District, and Juvenile and Domestic Relations courts. Previously, Commonwealth's Attorney Harvey Bryant's office handled collections, but budget cuts forced city leaders to come up with an alternative.
"We're going to take this criminal process, streamline it into the tax collection process and see if we can't make it work," Atkinson said.
"It is, in my opinion, one thousand times better service to the victims than we were able to provide," Chief Deputy Commonwealth's Attorney Colin D. Stolle said.
The treasurer's office sends restitution payers a monthly bill. And defendants will get charged fees ranging from $20 to $35, depending on the transaction, for the increased workload for the treasurer's office.
The General District Court may reconsider the decision to move responsibility for the collection of restitution over to the city treasurer's office, because some of the judges have had second thoughts about charging some of the fees involved, according to Stolle.
Typical cases in which judges order restitution include embezzlements, larcenies, construction and welfare fraud, according to Corey J. Burdin, victim witness assistant director for Bryant's office. The commonwealth's attorney's office in Virginia Beach took over restitution in the late 1980s, according to Stolle. As the city grew, so did the job. In 1993, the office collected $90,000 in restitution. By 2008, the amount collected totaled $1.2 million, Burdin said. It has 1,500 open restitution cases.
If people didn't pay, "The only thing we could do was take them back to court and ask the judges to put them back in jail," for violating the terms of their probation, Stolle said.
Criminal defendants often don't have a lot of disposable income, Stolle said. Some would tell judges they were between jobs, and often a payment plan would be worked out.
Under the new plan, Atkinson has two staffers involved in collecting restitution. The office can report the offender to the Department of Taxation for failure to pay. Or go to the person's home with the sheriff and take custody of personal property.
Atkinson said he initiated such proceedings in the case of a woman who owes about $250 in restitution and had ignored repeated payment requests and calls.
The office also can garnishee wages - without having to go to court to request permission, Atkinson said.
"There is no due process," he said. "That's basically the difference."
Trying to get probation revoked to send the offender back to jail will be a last resort.
Defense attorney Mark T. Del Duca said the potential of sending someone back to jail for not paying restitution was a big hammer the commonwealth's attorney's office had used in the past.
"You don't go to jail for not paying your electric bill, but you do go to jail for not paying your restitution," said Del Duca, who questioned whether the treasurer's office had the resources to take over the collection.
Atkinson said the new plan is an experiment - but one that his office is equipped to take on.
"We are in the money-collecting business," he said. "All it is to us i s another bill that we send out."
Crime victim Richard Sanders still thinks the threat of getting locked up is a good way to make sure people pay restitution. His used car dealership on Virginia Beach Boulevard was broken into in 2008. A window was broken, two offices were ransacked, and two laptops were stolen, he said. Mark Stacy was convicted of grand larceny and burglary and ordered to pay more than $5,000 in restitution.
Sanders said he started getting checks for $50 a month after Stacy was released from prison. At that rate, Sanders expects it will take more than eight years for him to get his money back.
When Sanders gets his check each month, he thinks about cases he reads about in which people are ordered to pay restitution for as much as $300,000.
"No way those people are ever going to see the money," Sanders said.
Jen McCaffery, (757) 222-5119, jen.mccaffery@pilotonline.com

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo
How about ---
Making them do community service to pay off the debt every weekend and send the money they make to the City as part of their bill! Better than that how about filing a tax lien in the Circuit Court. If they ever own anything(of any value)the lien will kick in!
On the surface, this appears
On the surface, this appears to be a logical move...but I'm sure someone here will poke holes in it at some point. If we lock someone up, then we're just spending taxpayer money to do so with nothing in return. As far as the fees...let the criminal pay. Why should the taxpayers foot the bill for the administrators who have to work on squeezing money out of some loser?
you asked for it...
Actually, the only issue I see here is the lack of due process. It slightly over steps the bounds of what the judicial system should already do... Other than that, it sounds like what should have been put in place with the advent of restitution.
Restitution
This is good news. Nevermind the bed, these criminals have I-Phones, I-pods, nice plasma tvs, home and car stereos, and fancy tires and rims on their cars. I see this every day at court in Orlando. The same should be applied to collect payments from them for their free attorneys. Your tax dollars are paying for court appointed free attorney when they are found indigent but meanwhile they come to court dripping in gold and with all the latest technology playthings.
they are doing better than Norfolk
Looks like VB is doing good trying to help victims while Norfolk can't even collect the taxes owed to them by their residents.
to be fair
i bet there are a significant amount of absentee slumlords on that list.....
Give Them A Little Credit
I'll give the City Treasurer and Sherrif a little credit. At least they are showing some initiative, and thinking outside of the box to try and find a way to have people pay restitution to the people who they victimized. Typically, Law Enforcement or the Courts will tell you to file a claim with your insurance company, and wish you luck afterwards.
No teeth!
Back to jail for not paying restitution? Really? Good luck with that one!
just a suggestion
Take the TV. Leave the bed.
I don't see a problem with
I don't see a problem with having the treasurer's office collect the funds, but I have some concerns about the ability of the sheriff to go to the person's home and confiscate personal property. How are they going to verify that the property in question is actually that of the offender, not a family member or friend? The record of law enforcement's abuses on confiscation and forfeiture matters is pretty extensive.