Jens Soering's parole in Va. denied a sixth time

Posted to: Crime News Virginia

By Rex Bowman

Jens Soering, one of Virginia’s most notorious prisoners, has been denied parole for the sixth time.

In a letter to The Roanoke Times, Soering said he was informed last week that, once again, the state’s five-member parole board has deemed him unfit for early release. Helen Fahey, chairwoman of the board, confirmed Wednesday that Soering has been denied parole.

Soering, 44, has been in prison for 24 years, serving two life sentences for the 1985 murders of his girlfriend's parents, Derek and Nancy Haysom of Bedford County.

The parole denial comes a month after the U.S. Justice Department said it would not act on the German government’s request to send Soering to a German prison, where he could be eligible for release after two years. Soering, a student at the University of Virginia at the time of the Haysoms’ murder, is the son of a German diplomat.

Soering’s effort to get to Germany infuriated Bedford residents and members of the Haysom family and also prompted an outcry from Virginia politicians, including Gov. Bob McDonnell.

In a prison interview last month, Soering said he now pins his hopes for freedom on parole. He said he doesn’t anticipate being released as long as Fahey is chairwoman of the parole board.

“I don’t feel I’m able to get a fair hearing,” said Soering, who maintains his innocence despite multiple confessions to investigators. “Helen Fahey has made it very clear that she does not consider me suitable for parole.”

Fahey, appointed to the board by former Gov. Mark Warner, was the U.S. Attorney in Alexandria and top prosecutor in Arlington County. She declined to discuss Soering’s case, but suggested he has no legitimate complaint.

“We look at every case individually, and we look at all the factors,” Fahey said. “The crime itself is the most important factor.”

The parole board's hard-line approach -- it has one of the nation's lowest release rates -- is being challenged in court by a group of inmates represented by the Legal Aid Justice Center and a Richmond law firm. The 11 inmates, who have been denied parole repeatedly, accuse the parole board of fixating on their crimes while ignoring other factors, such as their rehabilitation behind bars.

Attorneys hope to broaden the suit to a class action case on behalf of nearly 5,000 inmates -- including Soering -- sentenced before parole was abolished in 1995. A federal judge in Richmond is considering a motion by the state to dismiss the lawsuit.

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

And, after all, it is

And, after all, it is unlikely that he has access to any parents of a girlfriend that he can murder in his current situation. He should never be paroled.

And, after all, it is

And, after all, it is unlikely that he has access to any parents of a girlfriend that he can murder in his current situation. He should never be paroled.

Do away with parole boards.

Do away with parole boards. There should be no parole, period.

Actually.....

There IS no parole in the Commonwealth of Virginia. From the Department of Corrections website: Parole was abolished in Virginia for felonies committed on or after January 1, 1995.

He's right where he should be.

I wonder if the Haysoms would have liked to not have been murdered? You can't help but see the arrogance in this quote from the article, "accuse the parole board of fixating on their crimes while ignoring other factors, such as their rehabilitation behind bars." He seems to forget why he is there and is under the impression that as long as he behaves himself he should be allowed to walk among law abiding people again. Can't help but wonder who his next victim would be if he were granted parole. TWO LIFE SENTENCES! I hope he serves half that! ONE life sentence would be enough, either way as long as he leaves on a slab it'll be fine with me.

the alternative to life

Would have been the death penalty, which he should have received. Then we wouldnt be having this discussion and he'd be dead.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: Crime rss feed    News rss feed   


Toolbox


Partners