The Virginian-Pilot
©
Faced with the prospect of losing about 6,000 jobs and hundreds of millions of dollars through a single act of Defense Secretary Robert Gates, congressional and local leaders in Hampton Roads are spoiling for a fight.
Yet nearly a week after the shock of Gates' announcement that he will shut down the Norfolk-based Joint Forces Command within a year and slash spending on defense support contractors by nearly one-third over three years, the area's politicians are still scrambling to organize their defense.
For starters, they're lacking critical information because Gates offered few details to back up his decision. And there's no indication that the rest of Congress will support the Virginia delegation's bid to keep open the command, known as JFCOM.
"It is going to be difficult," said Frank Roberts, executive director of the Hampton Roads Military and Federal Facilities Alliance. "People are running around trying to do something, but we don't really have a scope of what this really means. We're essentially in battlefield triage mode."
JFCOM employs about 5,000 people in Norfolk and at a facility in Suffolk; the rest work elsewhere. Its overall contribution to Hampton Roads amounts to an estimated 10,000 jobs and $1 billion in economic activity each year, according to James Koch, an economist at Old Dominion University.
The command's mission is to ensure that different branches of the armed forces work well together. It's part think tank and part training center, and it assigns nearly 1.2 million troops for missions worldwide.
More than half of its employees are civilian contractors, a greater share than any of the military's other combatant commands, which made it a prime target for Gates' mission to slash overhead and use the savings to sustain and modernize America's fighting forces.
Gates contends that the JFCOM closure requires the approval of only President Barack Obama, not Congress.
Local officials say the timing of Gates' comments, made without warning to members of Congress, was calculated to give him an advantage in the public debate. His announcement came at the start of a five-week congressional recess that legislators traditionally use to begin their fall re-election campaigns.
So far, it seems to have worked.
When the House of Representatives gathered Tuesday for a special one-day session, Gates' announcement was on the front pages of many major newspapers but didn't generate much reaction from members of Congress, according to staff members of several legislators from other states, who spoke on background. Rather, the focus was the death of former U.S. Sen. Ted Stevens in a plane crash in Alaska, they said.
The Virginia delegation also lacks the veteran senator who protected the state during the 2005 round of base closures, John Warner, who retired in 2008. Its current senators, Democrats Jim Webb and Mark Warner, are in their first terms. On the House side, the highest-ranking member of the Hampton Roads delegation, Democrat Bobby Scott of Newport News, does not serve on the Armed Services Committee, though the three other local representatives do.
Local members of Congress say it will be critical to convince colleagues who have their own federal installations to protect that if Gates can single-handedly close JFCOM, he can shut down their bases as well.
In a letter to Gates on Friday, they argued that he is required by law to notify Congress before closing JFCOM. They also said that the closure recommendation was based on "superficial research and a lack of analytical rigor."
The letter was signed by Webb, Warner, Scott and U.S. Reps. Glenn Nye, D-Virginia Beach; Randy Forbes, R-Chesapeake; and Rob Wittman,
R-Westmoreland County.
Forbes, whose district includes the large JFCOM complex in northern Suffolk, said he's hoping to conduct a congressional field hearing sometime in the next month.
Meanwhile, U.S. Rep. Gerry Conno lly, whose Northern Virginia district has the highest concentration of defense contractors in the nation, has announced there will be a hearing in late September in Washington on Gates' plan to reduce spending on support contracts.
The chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, Missouri Democrat Ike Skelton, has said he'll ask for a hearing on JFCOM when Congress returns in mid-September.
Nye, whose district includes JFCOM's headquarters at Norfolk Naval Station, said Skelton told him he doesn't believe Gates followed proper procedure in closing JFCOM.
"He agrees with us that the process is broken," Nye said.
The delegation is arguing that because the command's shutdown involves more than 1,000 civilians, federal laws governing base closures and realignments require congressional review.
Locally, three groups have sought to play a role. The Hampton Roads Military and Federal Facilities Alliance is a government-funded group that lobbies in support of military bases. The Hampton Roads Military Affairs Commission is a panel of elected leaders and retired military officers created earlier this year by Nye in part to fight the efforts to move a Norfolk-based carrier to Mayport, Fla. The state Commission on Military and National Security Facilities is being formed by Gov. Bob McDonnell.
Of the three, the likely leader of the JFCOM effort would be the alliance, said Virginia Beach Mayor Will Sessoms, who is chairman of the alliance's board.
"The one with the money is going to take the lead," Sessoms said.
The group, which has an annual budget of about $760,000, is supported by a 50-cent-per-resident fee paid by the cities of Chesapeake, Franklin, Hampton, Newport News, Norfolk, Poquoson, Portsmouth, Suffolk, Virginia Beach and Williamsburg, as well as Isle of Wight, James City and York counties.
In the hopes of crafting some sort of uniform response, the congressional delegation has scheduled a meeting Wednesday in Suffolk with city officials and state legislators.
"Depending on what we get from that, we can see what kind of package we can put together," Forbes said.
Sessoms said he starts with the premise that "we intend to save it all."
Bill Bartel, (757) 446-2398, bill.bartel@pilotonline.com

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo


Though loosing jobs is of consern
ssssnake's comment is right on point. I would only add, If the politicians want to see the resource go to the region then it is high time we put a little work into a hopeful build of the Carriers Gates speaks of as a reason close the command for the sake of greater equipment and focus to our fighting men and women. Anyone who doesn't agree that military contractors and the cozy relationship as former brass to those still holding the strings on the purse are not out of whack can't see straight. I thinks its time to start working with federal authorities. Army core of Engineer leaders say that Norfolk city officials are always trying to swipe the land out from under that small base. Oceana we know of. Just seems the elected leaders of the area got spoiled off the military industrial complex and have no other answers and never have, for retooling the area.
Rampant phony Patriotism
Rampant phony Patriotism! This town loves to wave the good ole Red White and Blue. Wave it until the Green flag of cash or lack of cash effects their wallets. It has always been about milking the government for Contracting jobs, double dipping and military spending that make the cash registers go cha Ching rather than genuine support for our nation. Oceana, was a prime example.The city slowly and surly encroached upon the base like flies on Fido's last meal. The Brac commission finally said enough. The city was literally spitting in their face.The men in uniform of the Brac commision were unanimous in their assessment that Oceans was unsafe for the Pilots,and not suitable for their mission. The city did not care, Oceana was a cash cow and that is all that mattered.We are seeing the same greed now, all over again.
have you wondered why no one pays attention when you are right
The loud squeal of when you are wrong overpowers when you are right.
It is apparent that you have no experience or knowledge of the government contract process. It seems as though you think contractors tell the government how to write a contract and then award themselves the contract.
What is a double dipper?
Did you know you were WRONG again about BRAC? Go to brac dot gov and look at about and you will see there are NO uniformed members of the nine commissioners. There were FOUR retired military officers on the 2005 panel.
You were right about Va Beach "spitting" on Oceana by not controlling growth around the base - too bad the wrong rest drowned that out.
Phony argument
A strawman is a phony argument.
How did HR survive economically before 9/11?
Maybe we should start another war somewhere.
Mexico is nice in the autumn.
Contract Mexicans to do the fighting and subsequent nation building.
Jobs for Hampton Roads (support, training and logistics).
Jobs for Mexicans(in Mexico). "They will welcome us with open arms."
Two conundrums drummed!
Let the cry resound from every mountaintop, accross every meadow, lake, river and acre of pavement:
ZAPATOS PARA LOS RATONES!
Grumman had a meeting with
Grumman had a meeting with its JFCOM contractors last week, and said the usual...stay put, do the job, we know very little. As my husband said, many are starting the new job search (him included), and if something comes up for a person, they are going to bolt. BUT THE WORK AT JFCOM STILL NEEDS TO BE DONE!! So now, everything is up in the air with respect to JFCOM, given the slimy way this decision was made, thousands of people are unsure of what the future holds for them, and work at JFCOM is STILL needed, and STILL important. I can't believe there are people who still don't see this decision for what it is...cut the military to pay for stuff that the current ruling party LIKES. It would be one thing if it was a time of peace, with few troops in harms' way...but I certainly don't see the world getting any safer right now.
You are kidding right?
"So now, everything is up in the air with respect to JFCOM. . ."
No it's not in the air. JFCOM is done. Get over it and move on. All they are doing now (senators and local reps) is "rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic". when Oceana closes they will try the same useless tactics.
"given the slimy way this
"given the slimy way this decision was made..."
Let's see the OSD, Joint Staff and outside panels conducted months of analysis before making a recommendation. Both the incoming and outgoing Generals were consulted and Gates made a recommendation to the President.
Were you actually expecting him to ask the contracting firms for permission to make a decision?
Say what?
"the OSD, Joint Staff and out outside panels conducted months of analysis?"
Mind posting a link where you received that information? We just had an all-hands with the RADM from J9, and got a whole other story.
DOD not cutting military
Gates is cutting the redundant so a to have more money to spend on thye necessary. He has states that the area would get more jobs do to an increase in ship building the saved money would allow. I'me not an economist but the new ship being built might ass 10 thousand jobs.