McDonnell seeks abstinence-only education funds

Posted to: News

RICHMOND

Abortion-rights groups Tuesday denounced Gov. Bob McDonnell's decision to seek a federal grant for abstinence-only sex education while shunning funds available for comprehensive pregnancy and disease-prevention instruction.

Virginia's Health Department recently applied for a $1.27 million federal grant for supplementary abstinence instruction funds. The grant consists of about $900,000 in federal funds and a roughly $383,000 state match.

The state chapters of Planned Parenthood and NARAL Pro-Choice had asked the governor to instead pursue Personal Responsibility Education Program funds, a broader option that doesn't require state matching dollars.

When McDonnell declined, Planned Parenthood Advocates of Virginia issued a statement accusing him of "fiscal malpractice" for rejecting a program that had no cost to the state.

"Given Virginia's economic situation, wasting $400,000 of taxpayer money for an ineffective program is not a good use of the commonwealth's limited resources" wrote Jessica Honke, the group's policy director.

"The simple fact is that young people deserve honest information, not political ideology, in their health classrooms."

The Family Foundation of Virginia defended McDonnell's choice.

"Despite the rhetoric from the economic loser in this decision, Planned Parenthood, recent studies have shown that abstinence education effectively helps teens postpone risky sexual behavior," foundation President Victoria Cobb said, implying that Planned Parenthood wanted Virginia to obtain PREP funds so it could get a share of them.

Honke said Planned Parenthood has no such arrangements with the state but would have been eligible to apply for a contract if Virginia had received that grant.

McDonnell opted to apply for the abstinence grant, in part, because he has long supported funding for that type of education, a spokeswoman for the governor said.

Administration officials said federal abstinence education funds won't eliminate or interfere with sex- education programs already being taught in public schools.

State Sen. Ralph Northam, a Norfolk Democrat and a physician, said abstinence should be the goal but said he is disappointed McDonnell chose to disregard the chance to acquire federal dollars with more flexibility of use.

While abstinence is the only guaranteed way to prevent pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases, Northam said, "the reality is with teenagers their hormones come into play, and abstinence-only doesn't always work."

"We should at least teach our teenagers, I believe, all aspects of family planning and all the options that are available," Northam added. "There should be a comprehensive plan to sex education that strongly encourages abstinence-only, but it needs to be comprehensive."

Virginia's version of sexual education, the Family Life Education curriculum, is offered in at least 102 of the state's 132 school divisions, including Norfolk and Virginia Beach.

Lessons include abstinence education.

Julian Walker, (804) 697-1564, julian.walker@pilotonline.com

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

bwahahahaha

"The simple fact is that young people deserve honest information, not political ideology, in their health classrooms." wrote Jessica Honke, the group's policy director..
bwhahahahaha

Thats all the indoctrinate them with. Lemme guess she was sitting on a giant mushroom when smoking a hookah when she wrote it.

bwhahahahaha!!bwhahahahaha!!

Liberals

abstinence-only education

I thought teaching kids how to behave WAS a parents job rather than the governments?

Wow, what a fool I am to have actually believed the GOP and tea party folks were serious when it came small government and getting the giovernment out of our lives.

So to be consisten you will support that...

...the parents should be teaching their kids about sex and not the government.

and when the parent's don't

And when the parents don't, which the majority of parents DO NOT talk to their kidds about sex, what is your brilliant suggestion then?

The question was rhetorical Gertz...

I was seeking to know if they are consistent.

Why do you even pop in when you offer nothing of substance?

Please tell us oh wise one...is abstinence good or bad? Go on the record so we can see what you really think instead of just sniping from the sidelines.

I've done a lot of reading on the CDC web site and am very aware of the statistics so at least I have educated myself upon the subject and have formed an informed opinion.

please share

Please share those statistics that show teaching abstinence-only works better than teaching all aspects of sex education which includes abstinence.

Government Gertz...

Just go to the CDC web site and look at all the statistics for yourself. You have no idea how much data there is.

abstinence-only education

Ask Sarah Palin how well this worked out for her then get back to governor.

I have a better idea...

...get Clinton, Gore and Edwards to tell us how monogamy worked out for them.

or

newt

or

ed shrock

or (back to the thread) bristol palin

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: News rss feed   


Toolbox


special features