The Virginian-Pilot
©
In Resort City, Virginia, down by the water, a young police officer overhears a conversation in Spanish. A couple, deep in debate, step off a curb just before the light turns green.
The officer stops them.
"Papers, please," he says.
The couple look at the officer. They shake their heads.
"Under the authority of Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli of the Commonwealth of Virginia," the officer says, taking a deep breath, "I hereby declare that I have 'reasonable articulable suspicion' that you have broken the law, by which I mean you crossed the street and the U.S. border illegally. Show me your papers, please."
The couple look at the officer. They shake their heads.
"Look," the officer says, "I'm just enforcing existing law. It's settled legal principle. The law does not distinguish between criminal violations of immigration law versus violations of any other criminal law. Crime is crime. Show me your papers."
The couple look at the officer. They shake their heads.
"Look, I know that immigration is politically controversial," says the officer, "but the legal principles discussed in the opinion are a matter of settled law and do not break any new legal ground. Papers, please."
The officer grows exasperated.
The couple look at the officer. They shake their heads.
"Stay there," says the officer. He steps away, holding up his hand, and dials his phone.
"Sarge," he says, "I just made a stop on Mediterranean, down near the water. A couple. They were walking against the light. And" - his voice lowers - "they were speaking Spanish."
The officer goes quiet and listens. People walk by, staring hard.
"They kinda look foreign," the officer says into his phone. "I don't know. They just do. The guy needs a shave."
As the officer listens, the couple look at the officer. They shake their heads.
"I didn't ask whether they were on vacation," the officer says into the phone. "I don't speak Spanish."
He listens.
"Look," the officer says into the phone, "the attorney general says I can stop anyone if I suspect they've broken the law. And I think these people crossed the border illegally. Therefore I can stop them and demand to see their documents."
He turns to the couple: "Papers, please!"
The couple look at the officer. They shake their heads.
"I'm telling you, Sarge," says the officer. "It doesn't matter what happened in Arizona. That judge was an activist, and that immigration law is too popular to be unconstitutional."
The couple look at the officer. They shake their heads.
"You should see 'em, Sarge," the officer says. "They just shake their heads and don't say a thing. I don't think they understand a word I'm saying. I sure could use some help. Thanks."
The officer hangs up the phone.
"A translator is coming," the officer says. "He should be here in a little while. Maybe then you'll understand."
The couple look at the officer. They shake their heads.
Finally, the woman speaks.
"We understand you perfectly," she says, in unaccented English. "We just thought this was America."
Donald Luzzatto is The Virginian-Pilot's editorial page editor. E-mail: donald.luzzatto@pilotonline.com.

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo
Papers please
Your op-ed is pure unfounded BS!!!Cuccinelli is 200% correct. Illegal is illegal. How hard is that to understand? If I get stopped at a road check and have a suspended license, I guess they should not arrest me because I didn't do anything to cause them to stop me? That is using your "logic"! If the law is patterned after Arizona's then they MUST be stopped for another violation. RACIAL PROFILING is specifically prohibited! Either way, 'What part of ILLEGAL don't you understand?"
I've never, ever..
heard anyone in this country ask anyone else for papers. I have been pulled and detained by the police in my life, I have come (and gone) thru Customs at borders, ports and airports, I have applied for loans, I have been prescribed meds, I have purchased subscriptions to magazines, newspapers, and other products, I have had applications for security clearances, etc. I have ALWAYS been asked for "ID", in ALL of those situations. I have been around enough incidents where the police were obtaining info, or asking questions, and I have never, EVER heard anyone asked for 'their papers'.
I guess this is the long way taken to state I wasn't impressed with this editorial.
So...
Was this piece about a couple wasting an officer's time or a condemnation of the AG? The AG has stated that an officer CAN ask someone for "papers", but the individual does not HAVE to provide them, right? It's funny that you seem to have a problem with officers beginning a witch hunt for folks who look "sort of foreign", but you don't have a problem with these same officers carrying guns. Officers are MUCH more likely to shoot an innocent person than the average Joe, so you can trust them to carry a deadly weapon but not use common sense in cases like this? My guess is that officers will use the same discretion that they are asked to use EVERY DAY when figuring out whether someone looks suspicious, in general. It's kind of like watching two people exchange a small plastic bag on a street corner of a well-known "drug zone". Does an officer have a reason to ask them for their "papers"? This problem began with a total lack of effort in keeping illegals out of this country. Since the Feds won't actually DO anything, we'll get this... Officers who shouldn't be dealing with illegal immigrants trying to do what the Feds are responsible for.
Police officer's duty to ask for "papers"
If a few innocent people are stopped for a suspected criminal offense, and the officer has reasonable suspicion that leads him/her to ask if they are here legally, that would be worth the price (the price being following the law) if it keeps people like Alfredo Ramos from being here illegally. If Ramos had been deported after his first DUI, Tessa Tranchant and Allison Kunhardt would still be alive.
Casting the wide net
As I said in responding to yesterday's article on the Cuccinelli letter: when you cast a net this wide you're going to catch nine good fish (whose constitutional rights will be violated) for every one bad fish you catch in the net. Are we as Americans willing to pay that price? Great job as always, Don.