The Virginian-Pilot
©
VIRGINIA BEACH
The commanding view from the 17th floor of the Armada Hoffler building in Town Center is a pretty good sign that the meeting down the hall isn’t your normal grassroots gathering.
In the conference room of the law firm Williams Mullen this week, the group Light Rail Now held its first board meeting. It wasn’t just lawyers and the city’s business elite.
About 30 people from environmental, neighborhood, biking and running, housing, senior and church groups are on the board of directors. While the business community created and is financing Light Rail Now – $110,000 has been raised so far – it’s creating a broad-based coalition to support light rail, a sort of grassroots group building in reverse.
“The reality is most of these groups involved don’t have the financial resources to put it together,” said attorney Steve Davis, a board member of Light Rail Now and past president of Virginia Beach Vision, the business group spearheading the effort. “Where it goes from here is going to depend on the people involved and the direction they decide to take it. The business community has done the initial job to get this thing off the ground.”
City leaders and residents are trying to decide if they want to pursue a light-rail project that would cross the heart of the city and link to the Norfolk Tide line under construction. The city is trying to finalize a $40 million deal to buy a 10.6-mile unused rail line from Norfolk Southern. The City Council has not made a decision whether to support a light-rail project.
Virginia Beach Vision is a group composed of many of the Beach’s influential lawyers, developers and businesspeople. It has long advocated for light rail, viewing it as a powerful and lucrative economic development tool. The group backed light rail in 1999 when residents voted it down in a referendum. One of the lessons learned from the defeat was that light rail needs appeal beyond the business community.
“What we missed was the information didn’t get to the general public,” Virginia Beach Vision Executive Director Martha McClees said of the 1999 effort. “What we decided we needed to do differently was to focus on the citizens. We’ve reached out to as many groups as we could.”
Virginia Beach Vision did the fundraising for Light Rail Now and hired the group’s executive director, Carolyn McPherson, a former Amerigroup executive who most recently was executive director of the Samaritan House, a Virginia Beach shelter for homeless and domestic abuse victims.
McPherson said she will report to the Light Rail Now board, not Virginia Beach Vision.
“Everything is going to get handed over to Carolyn and that board,” McClees said.
McClees would not say who has donated money to Light Rail Now because she said contributors were not told their names might be made public. She said 77 people have made contributions ranging from $10 to $10,000, with most donations in the $500-$2,500 range. The group has pledges of $109,860 and actual receipt s for $88,910. The fundraising goal is $145,000.
The Hampton Roads Chamber of Commerce’s division in Virginia Beach has contributed money and is encouraging members to give.
“Business persons, more than most, can appreciate the value of transit oriented development as a stimulus to economic development …,” wrote Beach chamber chairman John Wilson in a fundraising letter to members.
Light Rail Now is a 501(c)(4), a nonprofit created to engage in advocacy, lobbying and political campaigns, activities generally prohibited for traditional 501(c)(3)s. Donations are not tax-deductible. Nonprofits are not required to disclose donors.
Davis and Thomas Frantz, CEO of Williams Mullens, headed the fundraising efforts as leaders of the Virginia Beach Vision’s Light Rail Task Force. Davis said the amount of money Light Rail Now will need depends largely on whether there’s a referendum.
“If there’s a referendum, it’s like there’s a political candidate we’re trying to get elected and the candidate is light rail,” he said.
Virginia Beach Vision also is lobbying the City Council to refrain from taking a position on a referendum for light rail until a study on the issue comes out next year.
McPherson agrees.
“It’s premature for the City Council to make a decision about a referendum until the study comes out,” she said.
Vision leaders say their goal is to convince the City Council a referendum is unnecessary.
While some council members agree, others, including Mayor Will Sessoms and Vice Mayor Louis Jones, say they support a referendum. Councilman Jim Wood, formerly a referendum opponent, now supports it, and so does a majority of the council. The result of the November City Council elections could change that.
Some Light Rail Now board members outside the business community said they don’t have a problem with a referendum.
Also, it’s not clear whether board members will reflect the views of the groups they represent. For example, Frank Gaillard, a Light Rail Now board member, belongs to the Virginia Beach Council of Civic Organizations. He supports light rail, but the civic group has yet to take a position on light rail.
“We’re just there to try and get information and take part in the process. That doesn’t mean we’re for or against it,” said Sam Reid, the group’s past president and chairman of the programs committee.
Tim McCarthy, a retired social worker on the board, said he thinks light rail could stimulate affordable housing construction and help seniors get around.
Some Light Rail Now board members have interests that go beyond light rail . The main interest of the Tidewater Bicycle Club and Tidewater Striders representatives is to get bike and running paths along any mass transit project on the line.
Bob Brunner of Tidewater Striders says his group is split on light rail.
“Right now, they’re more to the negative, but they don’t know all the details,” he said. “Personally, I’d like to see it. Hey, we’re a big city. I see it as a growth thing.”
Aaron Applegate, (757) 222-5122, aaron.applegate@pilotonline.com

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo
Another business lobby pushing abuse of tax funds
Yup, here we go again ... special business interests launch yet another "organization" trying to sell the notion that Light Rail is "supported" by some vast "majority". However, when the question of light rail was placed on the ballot in Virginia Beach back in 1999, the voters REJECTED this poor use of their tax dollars. A new referendum is needed once the AA/SEIS studies are completed and adequate time has been allowed to read and refute misleading aspects of these reports. It is no surprise that bankers, developer, law firms, and oceanfron hotel owners want to stick taxpayers with hundreds of millions of dollars to support their plan for urban redevelopment in Virginia Beach. More propagada to try to sell Light Rail to follow.
Summary of comments
In summary, it is clear that the extension of light rail through Virginia Beach is the most feasible, immediate, and low cost alternative to added mobility in the I-264 corridor. It has the added advantage of stimulating transit oriented development in the strategic growth areas along the rail line and I-264. Widespread support among community groups has been noted, and support is increasing as it becomes increasingly clear that the Commonwealth is not willing to maintain nor sustain its network of roads, highways, bridges, and tunnels. The attainment of a remarkably low cost for the 10 mile right of way adds credence to the prediction that this extension will be among the lowest cost projects/mile of its type in the nation. Employers, employees, students, the elderly, environmentalists, bicyclists, walkers, civic associations, ethnic associations, advocates for the disabled, and many others look forward to this alternative mode of transportation.
RUBBISH!
Light rail to VB stands to be a financial black hole to the citizens of Virginia Beach in cost over-runs and maintenance. You have unelected, unaccountable entities in HRT as well as the rest of the HR entities that have access to and continue to waste money exthorted from the taxpyers of VB without any consequences. The only bargain is for developers to make a fortune at the expense of VB citizens.
Repeal The Radar Detector Ban
As you may know, Virginia is the only state that bans the use and sale of detectors. There is no evidence that the detector ban increases highway safety. Our nation’s fatality rates have fallen consistently for almost two decades. Virginia’s fatality rate has also fallen, but not any more dramatically than it has nationwide. Research has even shown that radar detector owners have a lower accident rate than motorists who do not own a detector.
Maintaining the ban is not in the best interest of Virginians or visitors to the state. I know and know of people that will not drive in Virginia due to this ban. Unjust enforcement practices are not unheard of, and radar detectors can keep safe motorists from being exploited by abusive speed traps. Likewise, the ban has a negative impact on Virginia’s business community. Electronic distributors lose business to neighboring states and Virginia misses out on valuable sales tax revenue.
Radar detector bans do not work. Research and experience show that radar detector bans do not result in lower accident rates, improved speed-limit compliance or reduce auto insurance expenditures.
• The Virginia radar detector ban is difficult an
Future of Light Rail in Hampton Roads
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/08/07/AR2010080700075.html?hpid=newswell
Instead of giving the
Instead of giving the $238MIL plus the $100MIL mis-management cost over runs for light rail, that money could have been used to repave I-264 and then some. Millions spent for the benefit of a very few. That plus Tidewater gets very little share of transportation funds anyway. 90% goes to Northern Virginia.
American Governing Power Was Never Meant To Be Forced
Pushing this through without letting the citizens vote would be backwards and deplorable in light of what our democracy was founded to represent. People governing themselves, with politicians as managers, citizens as the CEO and all of us responsible to put in the work.
With Blinders on, The Vision is Straight Ahead
The worth of vision is based on the purpose of the viewers. Certainly having an alternative means of distance travel in the CoVB is a worthy goal in this day and age. Forcing a currently non-existant single alternative upon the citizens will be a tough nut to crack and grow to the mighty oak of a light rail system. For the majority of the local population, this will end up being money out of pocket without any recognizable benefit other than a limited service, single line amusement ride of sorts. Involved commercial entities will reap the greatest benefits by allowing their specualtive property purchases and delayed projects to flourish. In time, it may be the case that private automobiles will be restricted or banned entirely from the resort area, thus forcing the local population to rely on the LR to visit the oceanfront for day trips. All too often, the only vision followed by the CoVB comes from the vantage point of the belly-button porthole. Based on Norfolk and other similar projects around the U.S., we all will pay and some will loose, but only a few will reap profits and greater comfort.
The truth hurts
Very well articulated Bugga25. You have succeeded in causing our esteemed developer to almost burst a blood vessel. Fact is that your analogy is correct. This mismanaged boondoggle will cost taxpayers more in subsidies for the very few that will ride it. It will be like the SportsPlex. Everyone will show up once, then it will be deserted. Same with light rail. The developers have bought up the property around the line and will eventually allow the city to condemn property and homes for the sake of light rail stations and ammenities.
Oh please, what a croc
Oh please, what a croc; there must have been an emergency VBTA meeting last night to come up with additional ridiculous scare tactics. You say..."Forcing a currently non-existant single alternative upon the citizens"..., where did you get this notion? Light rail in the I-264 corridor is simply another alternative to provide added capacity and mobility in this corridor where most of the city's strategic growth areas are located. Given the cost of urban Interstate expansions, light rail is the low cost alternative to increase capacity. This threat about banning vehicles at the oceanfront is a dastardly example of the depths the VBTA leadership will go to maintain their delusional position of leadership in the anti tax community. Fact is, the organization died a long time ago, but DeSteph, Moss, Dean, Hedrick, Greenmun, Krause, et al just have not gotten the message. Less than 16% of the vote should have resonated, but these folks are delusional.