69°
forecast

Baby steps: It's a record year for turtles at Cape Hatteras

Posted to: Environment News North Carolina

CAPE HATTERAS, N.C.

They stood around an empty nest, little more than a hole in the sand where the miracle of life had already come and gone. They watched as a man in a green uniform lay flat on the beach and thrust his entire arm deep into the sandy ground.

Another man in a green uniform cautioned the crowd not to expect much.

"If we find a live hatchling, that's a bonus," said Eric Frey, a biology technician at Cape Hatteras National Seashore.

Moments later, a loggerhead turtle the size of a potato chip emerged from the hole. It wiggled in Frey's hand.

The crowd responded with a barrage of clicking cameras usually reserved for celebrities on red carpets. Children stood on their tiptoes to come eye-to-eye with the tiny creature. A woman wept tears not quite hidden by sunglasses.

"This little guy, or girl - I don't know what the sex is..." Frey said as he held a tiny, sand-

covered turtle struggling to swim through the air. "This little hatchling will, hopefully, grow to adulthood."

Turtles typically lay 80 to 90 eggs per nest; in this particular nest, technicians found 110 hatched eggs.

Frey spoke to a group of about three dozen people gathered Thursday evening on a beach between Frisco and Hatteras Village on the Outer Banks.

They came to watch park technicians excavate a turtle nest that had hatched 72 hours earlier.

It's a routine that park officials do to learn what they can about the rare turtles that lay nests on Cape Hatteras National Seashore. But they don't always invite the public.

By the demonstration's end, the crowd witnessed four baby turtles take their first steps on wet sand and into the ocean. Their chances of making it to adulthood are slim, but loggerhead turtles can reach 350 pounds.

"It's amazing to me how this all works," said Theresa Schwinghammer, 43, of Indiana.

With 153 nests, this is a record year for turtles at Cape Hatteras National Seashore - 68 miles of federally owned, public ocean shoreline managed by the National Park Service.

Three species of sea turtles - the loggerhead, green and leatherback - nest within the park, but only two are common. Leatherback turtles are considered federally endangered and rarely nest on the Outer Banks, the northernmost tip of their range.

"When we get (leatherback) nests up here, it's just kind of an anomaly," Frey said.

Loggerhead turtles are by far the most common. Of this year's 153 nests, only six are green turtles.

Turtles in Florida, Georgia and South Carolina are also "all having better-than-average, if not record, years," Frey said.

Regionally, the most likely explanation is an abundance of food, he said.

Loggerhead turtles eat mostly horseshoe crabs and blue crabs, while green turtles are vegetarians that eat algae and sea grass.

On Cape Hatteras, there's another factor that might be contributing to the turtles' success, but it's too early to say for sure.

Endangered turtles and shorebirds are at the center of a heated debate between environmental groups and beach-access preservationists, with the National Park Service caught somewhere in the middle.

Efforts to protect endangered animals often clash with the seashore's traditional role as a recreation resource.

The National Park Service banned summertime beach night driving in 2008, and nests have been flourishing on Hatteras ever since, Frey said. Before the rule was implemented, the record number of nests was 99, he added.

The ban on night driving protects turtles because it decreases the amount of artificial lights - from headlights, for example - and the number of people on the beaches.

Beach access is being further regulated by a court-sanctioned consent decree that is serving as an interim management plan until the Park Service implements a new one next year.

But John Couch, president of a local access advocacy group, the Outer Banks Preservation Association, said he is skeptical that the record number of turtle nests has anything to do with the regulations.

"We're happy that numbers are up," Couch said. "(But) to say and single out that either the ban on night driving or the consent decree had anything to do with it is misleading and disingenuous."

Couch pointed to turtles' success all over the Southeast and cautioned people not to correlate record numbers with access regulations until the matter is studied in depth.

Frey agreed that it's tough to say how much of a difference the night-driving ban has made, because nearly all other beaches in the Southeast established the same rule before Cape Hatteras did in 2008.

"Right now, we don't really know," he said.

Erin James, (252) 441-1711, erin.james@pilotonline.com

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

Facts are stubborn things

Interesting how the obvious is missed. For over the last decade there have been efforts further up North in places like Hudson Bay to improve the water quality. These are among the breeding grounds for horseshoe crabs. More crabs = more turtles.

Regarding the primary purpose of the park, it's for recreation as it is for most National Parks overall. This doesn't mean no rules, there have been sensible driving rules since the 70's that have limited where you can drive. Wildlife refuges and sanctuaries are for wildlife primarily. I cite this passage from pg 39 of the National Park Service publication "The Creation and Establishment of Cape Hatteras National Seashore".

"On June 29, 1940, Congress amended the 1937
authorizing legislation for Cape Hatteras National
Seashore to permit hunting. The amendment to
allow hunting specifically referred to compliance
with the Migratory Bird Treaty Act. This provision
would later be key in determining how the Park
Service actually interpreted “hunting” within the
seashore, but perhaps for the first time in the history
of the Park Service, legal hunting was now authorized
within a national park. The same amendment
also ch

That Might be Delaware Bay

Delaware Bay is a major breeding ground for horseshoe crabs. Hudson Bay would be a long trip. Just sayin.'

Why not quote the enabling legislation for Cape Hatteras Seashore and Recreation Area?

"Except for certain portions of the area, deemed to be especially adaptable for recreational uses, particularly swimming, boating, sailing, fishing, and other recreational activities of similar nature, which shall be developed for such uses as needed, the said area shall be permanently reserved as a primitive wilderness and no development of the project or plan for the convenience of visitors shall be undertaken which would be incompatible with the preservation of the unique flora and fauna or the physiographic conditions now prevailing in this area . . ."

Denny claims "More crabs =

Denny claims
"More crabs = More turtles"

Let me get this straight. It takes about 30 years for a sea turtle to sexually mature, but a decade-old horseshoe crab restoration projects speeds that up? Crabs on steroids?

I used to drive on the beach to go fishing

but I haven't done so in years, because they were completely elbow to elbow with drunken yahoos in jacked up pickups flying confederate flags etc. This is National Park land, not the private property of a handful of people whose admitted agenda is to make money off "visitors", no matter what they kill in the process. Their statements that they care about preserving the beach are "misleading and disingenuous." The ban on night-time driving and summer closures are fine with me, I can go there in the off season if I want. Even in the height of closure season, there are still miles and miles and miles of beaches where humans can go, except they are just too lazy to use their own feet. Does anyone else think they can go to other National Park land, like Yosemite or Yellowstone, and just go anywhere they like at any time and do anything they want? There are many millions of people in this country who support preserving wildlife and wildlife habitat, and that includes keeping people from driving over birds and turtles and their nests.

sorry

that's what Wildlife Refuges are for, not National Parks.
Good try though, at deceiving the readers!

Closures Affect Walkers Too

"Even in the height of closure season, there are still miles and miles and miles of beaches where humans can go, except they are just too lazy to use their own feet."

That part of the statement is false. Closed beaches are closed to walkers as well. The result of the closures for the walkers is that ALL users get crowded into the same mile and mile and, if we're lucky and the birds are spaced right, a third mile of beaches, out of seventy total.

Once upon a time, you could walk away from the crowds and find an isolated stretch of beach for yourself. But that's not possible under the current rules.

Walkers beware! The enviro-elites are trying to shut us out as well. We need to stand with the ORVers to regain access to our beach.

Right on Mike

It's always hyped as a vehicle issue, never mentioning that closures are off limits to all humans. It's no wonder the vast majority of closure violators leave footprints and not tire tracks. Seems likely most unknowing folks reading the press and SELC / AS / DOW spin think it's only about vehicles.

And to those who say get off your behind and walk, well you need to talk to some disabled folks who can't walk. For example can you say IED , as in disabled vet ???? Or try taking a 2 yr old on foot from the closest parking area to the calm sound side of Oregon , Hatteras, or Ocracoke Inlets or to the Hook are of Cape Point so they can play in some rip free water.

The Seashore is not just for the physically fit and able bodied.

Good point Jimmy. This is

Good point Jimmy. This is NOT an ORV issue, these are environmental ambulance chasers. Last year over $4.7BILLION was spent on environmental legislation, most of it paid by the fed with YOUR tax dollars. The litigation at Hatteras was NO different, hundreds of thousands of dollars to the SELC. Anyone who thinks this is about birds and turtles, wake up. Your civil liberties are being stripped for money.

Let's Win One for the Animals

It's heartening to see that wildlife gets a priority over a small ORV special interest group. Like what the Cape Hatteras Seashore was created for.

The ORV people somehow seem to see it as them having special rights over all others. Somehow they don't seem to realize they are a minority, and that they cause a good many negative effects. And that there really are many, many people who want beaches that do not have pollution machines grinding up and down the sand. The ORV people don't seem to recognize that they must share.

And thanks for a balanced article. One that shows both sides.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: Environment rss feed    News rss feed   


Toolbox