The Virginian-Pilot
©
VIRGINIA BEACH
The plan to preserve a major undeveloped tract of waterfront property in northern Virginia Beach has hit an obstacle.
Wayne McLeskey Jr., who once owned the 122 acres of wetlands, sandy beaches and forest near the Chesapeake Bay, has asked a judge to temporarily halt the sale of the land for environmental preservation.
The suit, filed in Virginia Beach Circuit Court in late August, has the potential to delay the deal between environmental groups, the city and Wells Fargo bank, or even increase its $13 million price tag.
The issue:
According to McLeskey, developer L.M. Sandler & Sons promised to realign and pave a road for him and provide a stormwater outfall for another of his properties as part of the agreement for the property. The work was supposed to be done as part of Sandler's plans to develop the land into a 1,000-home complex called Indigo Dunes.
The road and utility work were on top of the nearly $30 million that Sandler paid McLeskey for the land in 2007. Sandler, which is financially stressed and has lost control of the property to the bank, is unlikely to fulfill its promise, said Carl Isbrandtsen, an attorney for McLeskey.
The new owners, a partnership that would include the city, should, Isbrandtsen said.
"My client wants what he bargained for," Isbrandtsen said.
The Trust for Public Land, which is leading the partnership in the purchase of the property for conservation, is aware of the lawsuit, said Kent Whitehead, the Chesapeake project director for the organization.
"It may cause a slight delay, but we remain confident that the conservation of this property will eventually come to fruition," Whitehead said in an e-mail.
The preservation plan calls for Virginia Beach, the trust and the Chesapeake Bay Foundation to all help with the purchase of the land. Virginia Beach would contribute $5 million; the Chesapeake Bay Foundation would put in $1 million; and the city and trust have applied for a $3 million federal grant. The Trust for Public Land is also willing to sell a portion of the land for commercial use.
The deal was to be finalized with Wells Fargo by the end of the year.
W ells Fargo still wants to sell the land for conservation, but the timeline is uncertain, said Kristy Marshall, a spokeswoman for the bank.
City Attorney Mark Stiles said he was not aware of McLeskey's arrangement with Sandler until he saw the lawsuit this week.
"It's certainly something we're concerned about," Stiles said. "We have not fully evaluated the suit."
McLeskey, who at one point considered buying the property back from Sandler, is no longer interested in acquiring it, Isbrandtsen said.
The lawsuit is an attempt to get Sandler, the bank, the city and the trust to come to a resolution about McLeskey's road and outfall pipe, Isbrandtsen said. "This allows everybody to take a deep breath," he said. "Everybody ought to be able to sit down and agree to this."
Deirdre Fernandes, (757) 222-5121, deirdre.fernandes@pilotonline.com

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo


land barron - welcome to the market downturn
"The road and utility work were on top of the nearly $30 million that Sandler paid McLeskey for the land in 2007. Sandler, which is financially stressed and has lost control of the property to the bank, is unlikely to fulfill its promise, said Carl Isbrandtsen, an attorney for McLeskey.
The new owners, a partnership that would include the city, should, Isbrandtsen said.
"My client wants what he bargained for," Isbrandtsen said."
Welcome to the real estate market crash; where have you been? How is it the citys problem to make you whole for an agreement with a private developer that can't now deliver? If you're so smart, why didn't you get the cash for the road upfront? Face it, you're a victim (if you could call it that for getting $30M for mostly wetlands) of the crash - like the rest of working class America. buck up and move on!
Where does greed end?
Where does greed end? Just how much is enough? How long do you pursue it? Till the last breath? What a legacy.
The City is doing its part.
The City is already putting in $5M for Pleasure House Point. Not only that, the VB Parks and Recreation Foundation is working with local residents to acquire the property in its entirety. If you want to find out more, go to http://bit.ly/PHPfund. As far as I am concerned the Mayor has been there for us every time.
This makes no sense...if you
This makes no sense...if you have a contract or business dealings with a person or company that goes belly-up, your legal recourse is through bankrupcty proceedings or a legal claim against the person or company. McLeskey does not own the property...the bank does. This story is about people with money abusing the power that comes with it. In this case, the taxpayers will pay either way, with higher legal fees or a settlement.
Sorry, I meant Sandler &
Sorry, I meant Sandler & Sons does not own the property...the bank does.
Greed
The Sandlers paid McLeskey $30 million for the land in 2007. Drop the suit and let the current deal go through.
And these yankee carpetbaggers cannot wait to develop
OCEANA AND FT STORY NEXT!! Glad I left that rail-road to your wallet burg.
Want in One Hand, Squirt in the Other
The former owner works this city like a board game, with only one winner possible - not necessarily us. Drop the suit, back off and let the process unwind. When the time is appropriate, work with what ever entity acquires the property to get your way yet again. For reasons known only to the CoVB, no open properties best used for unincumbered access by the citizens and visitors to this cul-de-sac by the sea, shall not be left uncommercialized, be it the property in question, the First Street Recreation and Surf Park at Rudee Inlet, or other similar situations. Election day approaches. We desperately want trustworthy and coherent city leaders, but usually end up with a boat-load of squirt.
commercial use?
"The Trust for Public Land is also willing to sell a portion of the land for commercial use."
Huh? What commercial use? This land is not zoned for commercial use (it is zoned for Planned Development). How is commercial development of the land going to be more environmentally friendly than residential development?
Save PHP dot org
Could I recommend spreading the word about: http://www.SavePHP.org
100% baby!