The Virginian-Pilot
©
RICHMOND
A complex plan to privatize state liquor operations that Gov. Bob McDonnell unveiled Wednesday could make it easier to find a place to buy a bottle of booze; deliver hundreds of millions for road needs; and end Virginia's hand in selling distilled spirits.
But there's at least one thing even its biggest boosters acknowledge it wouldn't do: provide Virginia with the same amount of alcohol-related revenue it presently realizes.
And that could make the plan a tough sell for the governor in a tough economic climate with lackluster state revenue collections.
The estimated $304 million the state would receive annually from alcohol sales under the privatization plan is less than the projected $324 million it expects to take in this year, McDonnell conceded.
"I think we've got a meritorious proposal," the governor said. "Now, I will discuss this over the next 30 days-plus with leaders in both parties, in both houses, so that I can take away whatever objections that they might have."
The governor has said he'll call the General Assembly to Richmond for a special session after the November elections to weigh his plan and other government efficiency proposals.
The current plan calls for the auctioning of 1,000 licenses in three categories - for large and small retailers and specialty stores - priced on a sliding scale that would consider current state Alcoholic Beverage Control store profits in a given area and other factors.
Virginia operates 332 liquor stores, which the plan envisions would be replaced by private retailers.
Those concerned about an explosion of stores needn't be, said McDonnell, who predicts that many of the auctioned licenses would be bought by stores that already sell beer and wine.
"We're not talking about new stores, generally," he said. "We're talking about new shelf space."
And localities would retain the ability to regulate through zoning where stores could be, administration officials have said.
As presently formulated, the minimum bid for the least expensive license in Virginia Beach would be just over $191,000; bidding on the most pricey license would start at nearly $488,000. In less-populated localities, the starting bids would be lower.
Licenses would be granted in perpetuity, though owners would have the ability to transfer them if granted state approval.
The governor predicts that money raised from the auctioning of retail licenses would bring in a minimum of $265 million. Combined with the sales of wholesale licenses and other state ABC assets, the one-time haul would be $458 million.
Proceeds from an auction would be deposited into a state infrastructure bank, a revolving loan fund to help support transportation projects the state otherwise lacks the financial resources to fund outright.
The promise of more money for roads wasn't enough to convince some skeptics, however.
"The whole notion that we can drink more so we can drive more bothers me," said Arlington Democratic state Sen. Mary Margaret Whipple, a member of McDonnell's reform panel that will weigh the privatization plan.
Virginia currently purchases liquor from manufacturers and then adds a government markup, a handling fee and a state excise tax before bottles reach store shelves.
The state wouldn't be able to charge the markup or excise tax in a privatized system, though taxes on beer and wine would be unaltered.
Instead, McDonnell's model calls for an excise tax at the wholesale level.
Also brewed into the plan is an optional 2.5 percent convenience fee that restaurants could pay, allowing them to buy discounted distilled spirits from wholesalers and receive on-site delivery.
Julian Walker, (804) 697-1564, julian.walker@pilotonline.com

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo



The triumph of Grover Norquist
So, let me get this straight. We privatize in order to receive less money each year so the Legislature gets to make more cuts in local government services. That about sums it up; oh yes, all this for a one time infusion of perhaps $500 M to be split up for transportation improvements around the Commonwealth, the proverbial drop in the bucket. This proposal is so absurd as to make one wonder what promises the Governor had made before he realized that he could not make the business case.
Smoke and Mirrors
Read the power-point slide and tell me if you can understand it. I rest my case.
The state makes money
If this is a positive cash flow for the state why are we doing this again? It would seem to me that fixing or divesting drains on the state budget would be more deserving of the Governor's attention.
This would mean we are further subjects to VA.'s sin tax.
It's time for us the sheeple to put a stop to this unconstitutional madness.
Va. for decriminalized marijuana and the cesation of unnecesarry taxes on tobacco and alcohol. The grass roots movement starts right here and now.
Virginia's ABC System Works Well
I don't know about other states, but I beleive Virginia's ABC system works well.
1) Why trade the simple direct sale model for "the complex plan" the Gov is proposing?? If the plan is that complex, I don't beleive it will ultimately work.
2) Tripling the number of liquor stores is a simply bad idea. I don't beleive Virginia's residents or guests are unhappy because of the location or number of liquor stores. And ABC stores are generally clean, well run retail stores, very different than the average "liquor store" in the Eastern part of America.
3) ABC employees have every reason to be uber-careful when it comes to selling alchohol to minors. ABC employees have every reason NOT to sell booze to minors - they lose thier jobs. Liquor store owners have every reason TO sell booze to minors - they make money.
4) Direct ABC sales provides Virginia a steady, secure form of revenue that works in good economic times or bad.
I do not beleive Virgina trade a steady, simple revenue stream for a questionable income scheme that comes along with thousands of dark little liquor stores where the clerk sells booze to high schoolers.
This is exactly what we need!!!
Triple the liquor stores. That way with the increase in supply we can lower the cost of liquor and provide more avenues to obtain it.
Then all the po'folk can stay po'folk but drunk po'folk at least.
Thanks, but no thanks.
Just what we need, a trashy liquor store on every corner...
McDonnell's plan to privatize liquor sales reminds me of Gilmore's plan
to get rid of the personal property tax. The very same personal property tax most of us are still paying.
Poor Virginia, selling the ABC cash cow!
If you want to see a road system that is being properly maintained travel to NC. I was there this past weekend on a 250 mile trip, I passed over numerous county, state, & federal highways that were in various stages of being widened and or repaved. What do they have that VA doesn't have? A funded transportation program with a 30 cent a gallon tax. The VA gas tax has not been raised since 1986. What salary or expense can you think of that hasn't been increased since 1986? Cable TV, groceries, Defense spending, housing, education? Additionally NC DOT has a staff that is funded to the level that allows them to manage a highway program. VA DOT has been stripped bare, so much that VA ranked dead last in highway project construction in spite of Federal funds available for the taking. But then again the state AG would probably sue the federal government if funds were made available for the state, probably thinks it is unconstitutional. We get what we deserve.
"McDonnell's staff is
"McDonnell's staff is proposing levying an excise tax of $17.50 per gallon on distilled spirits at the wholesale level"
Is that a typo, $17.50 per gallon a the wholesale leval? That seems insane.
Let me see if I've got this right.
The so-called "party of no" that has "no new ideas of its own" has proposed a possible revenue-generating idea.
The so-called "party of yes" who claims to be the ONLY source of ideas and solutions is holding their breath, turning blue, throwing a hissy fit, and bawling "NO!"
Their "idea" remains the one-trick pony ... raise the gas tax.
"NO!" to everything else.