69°
forecast

Prosecutor: Ex-Blackwater duo 'out of control' before killings

Posted to: Academi - Blackwater Afghanistan Crime Military News Norfolk

NORFOLK

After a day of drinking beer, Christopher Drotleff and Justin Cannon "were a disaster waiting to happen" when they shot and killed two Afghan civilians after a traffic accident, a federal prosecutor told a jury Wednesday at the pair's murder trial.

"They were drinking. They were driving. They were armed. And they were out of control," Robert P. McGovern, a Department of Justice prosecutor, said in his opening statement.

But witnesses later gave conflicting testimony on how much Drotleff and Cannon were drinking, or even whether they were drinking at all. Some fellow contractors admitted that they lied on official statements to their superiors about the drinking.

Drotleff, 30, of Virginia Beach and Cannon, 28, of Corpus Christi, Texas, are charged with murder and related counts in the May 5, 2009, shooting deaths of two civilians in Kabul,

Afghanistan, and the wounding of a third.

McGovern said Drotleff and Cannon also were fueled by anger that day, following the firing of two of their superiors by Paravant, the Blackwater subsidiary that employed them. After the killings, they also tried to cover up their actions, he said.

Defense attorneys told the jury the two fired in self-defense after a car came careening at them on the wrong side of Jalalabad Road, called by one attorney "one of the most dangerous roads in the world." Contractors refer to it as J-bad Road.

Assistant Federal Public Defender Larry Dash, one of Cannon's two lawyers, emphasized to the jury the dangers in Kabul, where Americans are in constant fear of car bombs and improvised explosive devices. He reminded them of the reason U.S. troops are there - the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks by the Afghanistan-based al-Qaida terrorist group with the backing of the Taliban.

Drotleff's attorney, Lawrence H. Woodward Jr., told the jury there will be no evidence that his client was in a drunken rage when he shot the Afghans. Drotleff, he said, "was in legitimate fear for his safety" and the safety of the others when he fired his weapon.

During the day, two very different versions of what happened on that day in 2009 emerged from opening statements and the testimony of the government's first five witnesses.

On the day of the shootings, one day after two Paravant team leaders were fired, Drotleff, Cannon and a number of other contractors joined them for beers outside their huts at Camp Alamo. Some witnesses said the party started at 11 a.m.; one said it was after lunch.

At dinnertime, they moved

to a German restaurant across the main road at a French compound called Camp Warehouse. Witnesses were conflicted as to who was drinking beer. Some said there could have been non-alcoholic beer served. But they all acknowledged they were angry about the firings.

After dinner, several contractors, including Drotleff and Cannon, went to a recreation center that had a bar. Some played pool while others talked to some French women, witnesses said. They stayed for about an hour and returned to Camp Alamo.

One witness said he saw Drotleff buy 20 beers at once at the bar, but he couldn't say whether they had drunk the beer.

Two contractors admitted that they initially lied to Paravant officials about the drinking because they didn't want to lose their jobs. They later admitted it to the FBI and, now, on the witness stand.

But no evidence emerged that Drotleff or Cannon were drunk that day, or exactly how much they might have had to drink. Most witnesses only placed one beer in Drotleff's hand at the camp, one at dinner - which he only had half of - and one at the bar.

"No one at the party was drunk?" Cannon's attorney, James Broccoletti, asked Karl Newman, one of the Paravant team leaders who had been fired.

"No, not that I know," he answered.

"Nobody was out of control?" Broccoletti followed.

"No," said Newman, who before working for Paravant had served in the Marines for 11 years, receiving three Purple Hearts.

After returning to Camp Alamo, Drotleff, Cannon and two others decided to drive three Afghan locals to a taxi stand about six miles away. The Afghans feared heading out alone without protection.

But when the contractors asked Newman whether they could go, Newman told them, "Hell, no," he said on the stand. But on cross-examination, Newman added that since he had been fired, he told them to seek permission from the guy who replaced him. That person hasn't testified yet.

The trial will continue this morning in U.S. District Court on Granby Street. Several of the Afghans involved are scheduled to testify.

Tim McGlone, (757) 446-2343, tim.mcglone@pilotonline.com

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

Cougar 38 learn some definitions

What a joke claiming this is all due to "Obama Socialism". You obivously do not know the meaning of "Socialism". Then to blame two cowboys getting prosecuted for being loose and fast on the trigger is ridiculous. You have no faith in our Justice system and rather then wait for the outcome of the trial you are willing to let two possible murderers go free.

They are not US Military

They were not Military Soldiers, Not on a mission and had been drinking or at least hanging out in a Bar for God sake and innocent people died, dead! Quit making them out to be heroes.What a shame that the Afghan people could not try these mercenaries that are charged with murder. If they were in fact sober, they might not have even gone on the dangerous street in the first place. The fact is, that if these two had stayed in the Bar, not gone into a unsafe area without ORDERS innocent people would be alive. I say turn them over to the Afghan court system and let them deal with them. No more tax dollars wasted on mercenaries period!

Would like to know more

Would like to know more about the Afghans that were so important to transport to a taxi stand? That's a strange visual. Even if they were drunk, who is going to drive down Jbad road without being able to defend themselves. They could'nt of been that drunk. And oh, by the way, isn't the whole place "out of control."
Time Served

A few comments on previous posts......

1) These guys are Not soldiers.
2) Drinking did happen.
3) Lies were told by multiple coworkers to cover up their guilt.
4) There is a reason that our military does not go out and drink in
a battle zone,(at least they're not supposed to).
5) The trial is to prove either innocence or guilt.
6) I spent two tours RVN.

Army

ADSM, AAFPUC, JSCM, BSM. Don't bash brothers, they were on the front lines and are Americans. I don't care who pays them or how, their weapons are pointed away from US!

First, thank you for your

First, thank you for your service.
1. Sadly, they are soldiers. Unlike when we were in, now we hire former soldiers to perform what is a military function in a combat zone. These military trained civilians get paid by the US Treasury to perform these military jobs. While they are not subject to UCMJ, we should neverthless evaluate their actions as if they were soldiers, in my opinion.
2 and 3. They were not charged with drinking or lying.
4. and 5. Agreed. But in my opinion, we don't charge combatants with murder for mistakenly believing they're in danger...even if they're drunk.
6. I repeat my thanks for your service.

Last Saturday Night I drank a whole quart of rum............

But there's NO EVIDENCE that I was ever drunk. And my Cat will testify to that effect.

lieawers

Thanks for the new word, I love it. I'll have to keep this in my vocabulary. I also thought( I know, I know, here I go thinking again) that lieawers had to present facts, not fiction. It doesn't appear that is the case here.

Experience it.

I think any juror who would be willing to convict should first have to go to the so called scene of the crime and get a real feel for conditions.

agreed

Make them all drive from one end of Baghdad to the other in a Prius and see if they change their attitude

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: Afghanistan rss feed    Crime rss feed    Military rss feed    News rss feed   



Toolbox


 

special features