©
New season. Different reality.
Even those who didn't see how ODU's second go-round at football could be as surprising or successful as the inaugural year may have been a bit mystified by the Monarchs' dodgy performance against Jacksonville.
The ODU offense was guilty of too many giveaways, the defense of allowing the Floridians too many breakaways.
But this is a good time to recall that Saturday's loss was only the 12th game for the Monarchs program. The inexperience showed. With a tougher schedule ahead, maybe it will show more often than anybody at ODU wants to believe.
"We made a lot of mistakes in last year's first game, too," head coach Bobby Wilder said. "The difference was we won."
The difference? Chowan (last year's hand-picked patsy) wasn't Jacksonville, a team with plenty of experience and offensive options.
After his team's 35-25 loss, Wilder praised Jacksonville quarterback Josh McGregor, running back Rudell Small and wideout Josh Philpart.
"I feel those three kids beat us tonight," he said.
Wilder gave his own kids credit for digging deep and making a game of it in the fourth quarter, moving to within three points before Thomas DeMarco threw an interception in the end zone with 4:35 to play.
Speaking of new realities, a year ago, in 11 games, DeMarco threw only four interceptions. Against Jacksonville, he had three passes picked off, though only the last one should be deemed a poor decision or faulty execution.
"I forced the ball," he said of his final pick. "I was forcing it for the win."
DeMarco threw for a career-high 334 yards, but had ODU taken better care of business, last-minute theatrics from the quarterback might not have been required.
The Monarchs were inside the Jacksonville 15 in the second quarter when they were stopped on a fourth-and-1. After getting the ball back, ODU failed to convert on a 32-yard field-goal attempt.
"There were some things that were uncharacteristic of things we do," Wilder said. "That wasn't the style of football we need to play."
ODU overcame several hurdles in this game, but too many were of their own construction. A team that found ways to win last season had too big a hand in its own demise.
Even after DeMarco's final interception, ODU dug in and gave itself another chance. But with the visitors facing a third-and-forever in their own territory, McGregor went back and completed a 36-yard pass for the first down.
ODU's inability to keep its opponent pinned down at that moment was perfectly predictable for anyone who witnessed the Monarchs' secondary being picked apart all night. Then again, the pass rush was missing on that play, too.
"You have them third and long and they converted," defensive end Deron Mayo said. "It can be demoralizing."
Temporarily, sure. But it's far too early for disappointment. Nobody said the second season would be easy.
Wilder noted that the most progress ODU made last season was between its first and second games.
Maybe this is so much coach's spin, but keeping the focus squarely on the future is the best thing for any program with so little history to look back on.
In the meantime, a dose of reality never hurts.
Bob Molinaro, (757) 446-2373, bob.molinaro@pilotonline.com

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo
Tame indeed
I have to agree with bigrips, the article was pretty tame. I suffered through the game with the rest of the ODU faithful as the swiss cheese secondary gave up one big play after another. They didn't get much help from our pass rushers either. The bright spot on D is that they didn't run the ball all over us up the gut. Offense looked respectable, except for the turnovers. Problem is, with a suspect defense you can't afford turnovers. I'm no defender of Molinaro, but I certainly didn't see any personal attacks or much criticism at all in this column. He's just pointing out what must of us already knew: that it's going to be hard to match the success of their debut season.
Bob Could Take A Lesson From You
jime17508, you just wrote the kind of knowledgable critque of the game and the team that I feel Bob should be writing. You provided your opinion based on your knowledge of the game without all the snarky stuff Bob likes to throw in the mix.
My beef with Bob is, if his job is to give an honest, unbiased critique of the game, the team and the coaching, he should DO his job and leave his attitude and biases out of it.
hahaha
I'd be willing to bet the Pilot sports staff shared a laugh at that double post... Please point out the negativity with this particular column? Seemed pretty tame to me.
Apparently....
Apparently you are easy to amuse. The technical issue of the double post had nothing to do with me. (Though as far as I am concerned, it would be worth repeating.)
The reason I posted this is because Bob has a history of writing obnoxious, mean-spirited columns about ODU football. YES, this particular column was only mildly annoying, but I view it as the beginning of yet another season of him and his smug, counter-productive musings on Monarch football.
If you need any evidence of how insufferable he was last year (and will no doubt repeat that pattern this year), I recommend you read this column from last season and the many posts made in response.
http://hamptonroads.com/2009/10/weak-foes-make-monarchs-look-better-they-are?cid=srch
Apologies about the double
Apologies about the double post. Not sure why it did that.
Petty Peanut Gallery Piffle
Last season I read your column after Monarch football games & was annoyed by your smug, mean-spirited scribbling. Not one constructive thing comes from you, only snarky, personal attacks on the skills of the players and of course, the coach. Coach Wilder can ignore the piffling peanut gallery that is your column, but you scrape the bottom of the barrel with your nasty comments about those kids.
And although I am using the word journalism loosely here, I think this quote applies perfectly to a column by a writer who never played or coached a game at this level, yet feels entitled to pontificate:
"Journalism - a profession whose business it is to explain to others what it personally does not understand."
p.s. Consider covering Pop Warner, I suspect it’s more suited to your personal experience with the game. But then again, perhaps not, little kids don’t need to be humiliated in print either.
Petty Peanut Gallery Piffle
Last season I read your column after Monarch football games & was annoyed by your smug, mean-spirited scribbling. Not one constructive thing comes from you, only snarky, personal attacks on the skills of the players and of course, the coach. Coach Wilder can ignore the piffling peanut gallery that is your column, but you scrape the bottom of the barrel with your nasty comments about those kids.
And although I am using the word journalism loosely here, I think this quote applies perfectly to a column by a writer who never played or coached a game at this level, yet feels entitled to pontificate:
"Journalism - a profession whose business it is to explain to others what it personally does not understand."
p.s. Consider covering Pop Warner, I suspect it’s more suited to your personal experience with the game. But then again, perhaps not, little kids don’t need to be humiliated in print either.