The Virginian-Pilot
©
NORFOLK
For all but a few Hampton Roads schools, the news is good: They passed the state Standards of Learning benchmarks and secured full accreditation.
However the hammer came down on Norfolk’s Lafayette-Winona Middle School, which was stripped of accreditation by the state Department of Education for its consistently poor performance. Lafayette-Winona is one of only four schools statewide that lost accreditation.
Two other Norfolk schools were warned by the state that they need to do better.
Portsmouth came up one school short of attaining full accreditation throughout the division. Brighton Elementary barely missed the mark and was issued a warning.
All Chesapeake, Suffolk and Virginia Beach schools made the grade.
Failing to earn accreditation can hurt a school division’s reputation but rarely results in more than bad publicity.
Schools are given lots of time and leniency to improve test scores. The state has never pulled funding or forced a low-performing school in South Hampton Roads to close.
Lafayette-Winona’s failure is the first for Norfolk since the state began denying accreditation to chronically under performing schools in 2006. Other failing schools have included some in Petersburg and Sussex County.
Norfolk school officials said Wednesday that they have already made a number of changes to improve student performance at Lafayette-Winona. The middle school was embroiled in a cheating scandal last school year that involved an alternative accreditation test in 2009- 10. Its principal and department heads have been replaced.
Norfolk leaders were elated that two of the schools that missed accreditation last year, Lake Taylor and Northside middle schools, passed the latest round of tests. The accomplishment was especially rich for Lake Taylor, which has not met state SOL benchmarks since the assessments were instituted in the 1990s.
In all, 45 of the division’s 48 schools are fully accredited. Norfolk’s Ruffner Academy and Lindenwood Elementary are accredited with warning.
“We are thrilled with their efforts, and we want to see that replicated at all of our schools,” Superintendent Richard Bentley said.
Brighton Elementary’s failure to make the grade was a disappointment in Portsmouth. Last year, the school division celebrated after all of its schools were accredited for the first time in its history.
Norfolk leaders must now submit a plan to the state for raising Lafayette-Winona’s performance.
“We have a lot of work to do at Lafayette, and through the corrective action plan, we’ll put resources in place and personnel necessary to help them reinvent Lafayette this year,” chief academic officer Christine Harris said.
According to Norfolk leaders, Lafayette-Winona struggled with test pass rates in history, although the school met state benchmarks in English, math and science. Lafayette-Winona earned a 59% pass rate in history.
In middle schools and high schools, a pass rate of at least 70 percent in all four subject areas – English, math, science and history – is required for full accreditation.
The state requires that within 30 days, the division must notify parents in writing of Lafayette-Winona’s accreditation denial. It must also give parents a copy of its proposed corrective plan, including an implementation timeline. School leaders must also give the public an opportunity to comment on the plan before it is adopted by the School Board.
Norfolk’s board and the state Board of Education must agree on the plan by Nov. 1. After that, Norfolk leaders will need to file periodic status reports with the state.
Because the school no longer is accredited, Norfolk also has the option of closing the school, combining it with a higher performing school or reconstituting it. Reconstitution could include restructuring the school’s administration, instruction, employees or student population.
But Harris said that with the installation this summer of new leaders at Lafayette-Winona, “in essence, we have already reconstituted the leadership.”
All three Norfolk schools that did not meet full accreditation standards have new principals this year, and Ruffner and Lindenwood have received $4 million each from the state for school improvement.
The division said Tracey Flemings, Lafayette-Winona’s new principal, met with the school’s staff Wednesday morning to talk about the SOL results. Flemings is the former principal of the fully accredited Rosemont Middle School.
“It’s a new year,” Flemings told the staff. “We are going to have great things happen this year.”
Steven G. Vegh, (757) 446-2417, steven.vegh@pilotonline.com

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo
My daughters now a junior in
My daughters now a junior in High school. The school is telling me she has to take the middle school SOL's in order to graduate. She took accredited tests in middle school but not "SOL's" and I'm told they don't count, only SOL's. Well how many of us would remember enough of classes we took 6 years before to take a test without refresher courses. Of course her test results will be in her college folder as if the tests were taken with everyone else. I have no idea how to fight this and get her the high school diploma she earned. I'm told any kid moving in from other states have this done to them as well. This is red tape, I want my money and to look good ridiculous.
But What Are they being taught?
From a previous article, I saw that one of these schools failed history but got 100% in “earth science”. The history test probably requires them to know about facts, not “feelings”. I’ll bet many of the students who don’t quite remember who George Washington was could write a complete biography on Al Gore.
I'll take that bet based on
I'll take that bet based on two factors
1. You've got an obvious bias and that has colored your thinking
2. You obviously don't have a good grasp of what Earth science even is. I'd say I'd guess that the odds are good that you don't have a good grasp of statistics either
Enlighten Me
You were pretty polite so I will try to act the same way. To summarize (I’ll make a separate post with more details), yes I am biased but it is based on science, not feelings. It is also possible that I don’t know what earth science is. I’m somewhat guessing from the title. Do they teach that it is a scientific fact that human industrial activity makes a significant contribution to global climate change? Do they teach the kids to unplug their charger from the wall when the other end is not plugged in? If the answer to either is “yes”, I know what they are teaching. As far as statistics goes, I studied that in graduate school and may not remember a lot about it but I do know you can prove anything you want to if you begin with the conclusion before you start the study.
Too late to really succeed
The hard science says the brain is forming neural networks between birth and about age 5 at an enormous rate that will never be repeated. If children aren't exposed to reading and critical thinking before age 4, they will never become the scholars they could have been. I tend to be a conservative SOB on most accounts, but until we as a society find a way to get the youngest the head start that they MUST have, we will continue to pay a high cost (and not just in dollars) for their entire lives...and so will they. Those under five are helpless victims. For those parents who can't or won't engage their children, we must find a way get it done. Otherwise, the little 7 year old who didn't get the early advantage will continue to be mystified by how those around him/her can look at squiggly lines on paper and draw coherent conclusions from them. Even two hours a day of free childcare/butt-wiping/educating for the two-to-three year olds in the at-risk neighborhoods would be an excellent start. Six or seven years is too late to really succeed.
nothing good
No amount of money will make a kid do good in school if his parents don't push him/her. How about making the parents show up and discuss results about their kids
Must Have Parental Involvement
You can send these kids to private or public schools but if the parents are not involved with the students achievement then they are doomed. Also, has anyone ever talked with the students to see why they can't pass these SOL tests - are they too hard? Are the concepts too difficult?
Or, they just can't take tests? Maybe its not cool to be an academic nerd and do well in school.
There needs to be a way of getting parents to the schools and with their cooperation their children need to working harder to make it academically. The key is motivation.
The school has to be more aggressive with "deadbeat" parents. My apologies to parents who are trying, but not seeing results.
Shouldn't SOL be in the Pilotonline word filter ?
I'm walking on eggshells whahoooh !
Why would you fire the new
Why would you fire the new principal? She JUST GOT THERE in July. Give her a chance and have a little faith, would you?
biased much?
Ok, VA Pilot - we know that everyone thinks Norfolk is the bad kid in the Hampton Roads family, but it's getting a little heavy handed don't you think? My headline on my sidebar noted the Norfolk school losing it's accreditation and in the very next sentence noted that all the surrounding cities kept theirs. The tone that this creates is a little bit like the awful parent telling the bad kid, "Why can't you be more like your brother?" It's not productive, not helpful, and gives the article a bit of an anti-Norfolk tone.