The Virginian-Pilot
©
A military investigation into the death of a British captive during an attempted rescue 7,000 miles away will likely focus on the actions of a Navy commando based in Virginia Beach.
Army Maj. Gen. Joseph Votel, chief of staff at U.S. Central Command, has been tapped to lead the inquiry into the botched rescue of British aid worker Linda Norgrove in Afghanistan on Saturday.
According to the British newspaper The Guardian, Norgrove may have accidentally been killed by a grenade thrown by a Navy SEAL during the rescue. It also alleged that the SEAL did not immediately report having thrown the grenade. In the hours after the attack, British and U.S. military accounts said she died when a captor detonated a bomb.
Norgrove, 36, worked for a U.S. aid organization. She and three Afghan co-workers were ambushed and kidnapped on Sept. 26 while driving through Kunar province, in Afghanistan's mountainous eastern region.
British Prime Minister David Cameron and President Barack Obama approved the covert rescue mission, which involved a team of highly trained special operators rappelling out of a helicopter and into the compound.
That's the kind of work handled by Navy SEALs stationed in Virginia Beach. Formerly known as SEAL Team Six, the counter-terrorism commandos from Dam Neck - an annex of Oceana Naval Air Station - are now part of the Naval Special Warfare Development Group.
The classified outfit is rarely identified by name, but according to The Guardian, the SEALs were familiar with the terrain and the enemy, and had been operating in Kunar for months.
High-altitude surveillance from unmanned drones had traced the kidnappers to a mud-walled compound high in the Korengal Valley, according to The New York Times - an area that has seen bloody firefights in recent years between the Taliban and U.S. forces.
According to multiple accounts of the raid, six of Norgrove's captors were killed in the initial assault, but one managed to drag her out of a hut. She died moments later in a massive explosion.
Initially, British and U.S. officials said Norgrove was killed in a captor's suicide explosion. But footage from the raid, and doubts from one of the task force commanders who watched the operation from afar in real time, led to a different possibility.
According to Maj. Sunset Belinsky, a spokeswoman at NATO headquarters in Kabul, the commander's video review hours after the attack "showed what was believed to be a member of the rescue team throwing a hand grenade in the area near where Linda Norgrove was later found."
By Monday, U.S. Army Gen. David Petraeus, the top commander in Afghanistan, had phoned the British prime minister to share growing doubts about how Norgrove died.
"That evidence and subsequent interviews with the personnel involved," said Cameron, speaking to reporters in London, "suggest that Linda could have died as a result of a grenade detonated by the task force during the assault. However, this is not certain and a full U.S./U.K. investigation will now be launched."
A spokesman for U.S. Central Command said Gen. James Mattis ordered an investigation into Norgrove's death, at Petraeus' request. Votel's team will work in close cooperation with U.K. authorities, the command said in a news release.
The Guardian reported that after the commander's video review, he asked the SEALs involved if any had used a fragmentation grenade. No one had reported using grenades during the post-mission brief, but after questions from the commander, one stepped forward and said he had, the newspaper said.
Central Command spokes-man Lt. Cmdr. William Speaks would not comment on the Guardian's story, which reported that the SEAL who allegedly threw the grenade faces disciplinary action.
"We have made no conclusions whatsoever," Speaks said.
For his part, Prime Minister Cameron seemed reluctant to second-guess the rescue effort.
"I'm clear that the best chance of saving Linda's life was to go ahead, recognizing that any operation was fraught with risk for all those involved, and success could by no means be guaranteed," Cameron said in his Monday statement. "We should also remember that ultimately the responsibility for Linda's death lies with those who took her hostage."
Kate Wiltrout, (757) 446-2629, kate.wiltrout@pilotonline.com

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo


Entire debate is a moot point.....
This article contains nothing but allegations, poor non grounded ones at that. The FACT that the title alleges it COULD be a Navy Seal, who COULD be from an East coast unit, who MIGHT be involved in the rescue whe3re a grenade MAY have been used.
Any first year Journalism student would get an F with a headline like that and the follow on lack of supporting detail.
Folks, non of these facts are in yet. Maybe the plan went according to brief, guess what, the guys holding her hostage were not briefed on their part. Maybe they didn't even feel like being in the play book?
tough and the way it goes
Rescues are dangerous, and sometimes split decisions go the wrong way. How it was reported is irrelant. These are soldiers fighting a war, not municipal police officers in the U.S.
Give them more ammo, loosen the guns, and keep the press the hell out of the way and certainly don;t support them with Humvee rides, tents, and medical help. Wanna be there? Support yourselves....Oh and leave the dog gone SEAL teams alone so they can do their jobs fret about the enemy and not their own country.
I'm sure I'll be accused..
of being insensitive, or worse, but I'm going to say this anyways: per the death of this young woman via a grenade delivered by the ones who attempted to rescue her, so what? Seriously, is this going to be a witch hunt towards those who risked THEIR lives to rescue her and the others who had been nabbed? Talk about perverting the situation. She wouldn't have had to be rescued if the REAL BAD GUYS hadn't kidnapped her to begin with. The life expectancy for those kidnapped in Afghanistan is not very high, and they face a most grusesome death at the hands of their captors.
Those who hold hostages use those hostages as shields, precisely to defend against these kinds of rescue tries. But here we have the usual suspects doing the bidding of the terrorists and assigning blame to those who are NOT responsible for what transpired! Good for all involved that the attempt was made to rescue them, and the fact that the others WERE saved makes it a good mission. That is reality. It is tragic what happened to this young lady, but thanks to these SEALS, a bigger tragedy was averted!
Common sense
Those out there with absolutely zero experience in either war fighting or combat, understanding you have your right to speak, in general should refrain from commenting on the TACTICS of the situation. Sure, you may have an opinion on how YOU would have ran the operation from your vast tactical experience in a video game, but understand that going into a Hostage Rescue situation is inherently dangerous for the rescuers and the hostages. It doesnt always turn out like Jessica Lynch. Good intelligence is your best weapon when you go on a hit, and if the intel is bad or it has changed it stinks but you have to deal with what you have. Sometimes bad things happen to good people. Its war.
What??
How is USMC's comment a thumbs down??
The left!
The Liberals and OBAMA trying to make the military look bad.
Really!!!
By telling the truth and investigating a tragedy???? You are right. They should have handled it the way the "Shrub" administration handled the killing of Pat Tillman. Lie about it until you can't lie anymore. Disgrace the memory of the one killed, the family and our country. You are right, that is what they should have done.
What Coverup?
I'm not sure this was a cover-up. I've never been in a firefight, but I imagine, no matter how well planned, it is a horribly chaotic situation. The article says afterwards reviewing video and observation by a commander from outside the scene caused the change in the report. I'm sure the men in the firefight weren't just soaking it in and taking notes.
There was a cover up
In the after action the question was asked if anybody threw a fragmentation grenade. Nobody admitted to it. Only after the video was watched did the seal fess up. Denying throwing a grenade than when caught admitted throwing a grenade is a cover up. If the seal had admitted to throwing a grenade then things revert to the "Fortunes of war" argument.
"the question was asked if anybody threw a frag"
Where does it say anybody was asked? I don't see that, and if the unit were in the habit of covering up their activities then wearing helmet cams wouldn't be SOP.