69°
forecast

Embezzlement case against party planner dropped

Posted to: Chesapeake Crime News

CHESAPEAKE

A prosecutor Thursday decided not to try embezzlement charges against the owner of Carpe Diem Concierge Services over an aborted trip and Playboy Playmate party in Dubai, telling a Circuit Court judge that the complaining witnesses didn't want him to pursue the case.

Kristin R. Cassen, the owner and party planner, said afterward she had hoped for an outright dismissal on the case's merits. She and her lawyer have contended her differences with two local businessmen were, if anything, a civil contractual matter.

Assistant Commonwealth's Attorney Derek Wagner declined to comment after the brief hearing. His decision means the indictments against Cassen are dismissed, but another grand jury could bring the same charges later.

Carpe Diem advertises as arranging discreet, upscale diversions for traveling celebrities and professionals in entertainment and sports, such as private parties, golf outings, concert tickets, nanny services and bachelor parties.

Kenneth "Kent" Basnight and John Babb told police they agreed with Cassen in early 2009 to arrange a $75,000 group trip to Dubai that, court documents and interviews showed, would feature golf, real-estate pitches and Playboy models socializing at a party.

The trip didn't happen, and Basnight and Babb complained that they had to pay credit-card expenses incurred by Cassen. But Cassen said she had upheld her end of the deal, and the two businessmen failed to attract enough guests to cover the costs. Still, a grand jury indicted her in April.

"This morning's outcome," Cassen's lawyer, Fred Taylor, said outside the courtroom, "speaks to the fact that this shouldn't be here."

Babb later declined to comment, and Basnight didn't return a phone call.

Matthew Bowers, (757) 222-5221, matthew.bowers@pilotonline.com

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

Spellcheck.

Dismiss w/out PREJUDICE...not "prejustice".

what about her losses?

I'm sure she incurred some expences, like hiring a liewyer(spelled like that on purpose), time spent making arrangments & talking w/her liewyer, time spent in court, etc. etc. etc... To me it looks as if both parties have lost $$'s on this party venture. I'd call it even, but you know the liewyers wouldn't dismiss w/out prejustice, so they can refile the charges later, when the plaintiffs change their minds. Get real here people, parties are just what they are, money thrown away on a good time. Nuff said.

This "Kent" Basnight?

http://www.basnightlandandlawn.com/aboutus/whoaretheexperts/kentbasnight

Bahahahaha

The "complaining" witnesses didn't want the case to go forward. Must be some dirty little secrets hidden in the details that they didn't want (or could afford) exposed.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: Crime rss feed    News rss feed   



Toolbox