68°
forecast

Local schools use history book with error about black soldiers

Posted to: Education News

An elementary-school textbook that asserts many black soldiers fought for the South during the Civil War is circulating in some area schools.

That claim has been widely discredited, according to historians. Moreover, they say, it is often made by groups looking to rewrite history.

The book is being used by fourth-graders in Norfolk and fourth- and fifth-graders in Chesapeake. In Suffolk, it is not the official textbook, but it is used as a resource for fourth grade.

Virginia Beach schools also use it as an optional resource for fifth grade, and Tuesday the School Board considered adopting it as a primary text. Now the board is backing away.

"We are appreciative of the timing of this story because curriculum and instruction will now remove the textbook from consideration for adoption," spokeswoman Kathleen O'Hara said in an e-mail. Portsmouth schools are not using the book.

Schools statewide have been discussing what to do since a Washington Post story Wednesday exposed a section in "Our Virginia: Past and Present," published by Five Ponds Press. On its website the company, which is in Weston, Conn., says it is "d edicated to providing colorful, exciting, affordable books to support Virginia's History and Science SOLs."

According to the Post's story, it was Carol Sheriff, a historian at the College of William and Mary, who noticed the error in her daughter's textbook. The passage reads, "Thousands of Southern blacks fought in the Confederate ranks, including two black battalions under the command of Stonewall Jackson."

Author Joy Masoff, who is not a trained historian, defended her work but admitted that she found the information primarily through Internet research.

"As controversial as it is, I stand by what I write," she told the Post. "I am a fairly respected writer."

The Internet is where the idea of black Confederate soldiers has reached a pitch.

Organizations out to memorialize the war want to believe it was fought primarily over states' rights or economics instead of slavery, said Timothy Orr, a history professor at Old Dominion University.

"It tends to be a kind of propaganda," Orr said.

The Confederacy banned black soldiers from its armies until they were desperate - three weeks before Richmond fell, said James Loewen, professor emeritus at the University of Vermont and author of "The Confederate and Neo-Confederate Reader" and "Lies My Teacher Told Me: Everything Your American History Textbook Got Wrong."

The problem with elementary-school textbooks is first that they're rarely written by history scholars, and second that vetting groups don't always read them, he said.

"There's absolutely no quality control anywhere along the line," Loewen said. "So it's just terrible history with terrible consequences for today."

State schools spokesman Charles Pyle said the state Board of Education approved "Our Virginia" in March. It was reviewed by a committee of teachers who screen new textbooks for alignment with the state Standards of Learning.

No historians sit on that committee, although historians do sit on a committee that reviews the standards.

"Clearly they overlooked something here," Pyle said.

Now that state officials know the book contains incorrect information, they are notifying the divisions. Textbook errors are found from time to time, but not usually with material this provocative, Pyle said.

Local school boards also have committees that review textbooks on the state's approved list. Usually the committees are made up of teachers and parents.

Sheriff said in a Washington Post web chat Wednesday that aside from the part about black soldiers, "Our Virginia" is in line with scholarly interpretations of slavery and other points.

Nevertheless, Virginia Beach principals are asking teachers who have copies to stop using it until steps can be taken, O'Hara said.

Chesapeake schools won't stop using it, in part because it is just one tool of many that teachers use in the classroom, spokesman Tom Cupitt said. Plus, fifth-graders won't reach their Civil War lessons until spring, giving teachers time to adjust their plans, he said.

And in Norfolk, students might have a discussion on the way.

"This question about 'Our Virginia: Past and Present' could provide a teachable moment," schools spokeswoman Elizabeth Mather said in an e-mail.

Elisabeth Hulette, (757) 222-5216, elisabeth.hulette@pilotonline.com

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

History book error

What is a non-trained historian doing writing a history book for elementary children and what is the publisher thinking when they printed this book of error? No wonder the kids are having low scores on SOLs and SATs if they are only being fed false info. . , who ever would do research on the internet and use it as the gospel of truth??? Did she even look in other historic text books or check the archive info on the soldiers of the Civil War??? We may be becoming more technical but realistically we are going backwards in REAL knowledge. Also who was the person who bought these books for the local schools -- did they not READ the textbook??? This in inexcuseable!!!!!

"Internet research"?

Author Joy Masoff, who is not a trained historian, defended her work but admitted that she found the information primarily through Internet research.

Would-be textbook writers, repeat after me: Wikipedia is NOT a reliable source.

I think these revisionist historians should do more research

here's a good site to start with http://blackconfederatesoldiers.com/

articles from Harper's weekly during the civil war, from Frederick Douglas, Booker T. Washington, Northern war correspondents, pictures of actual black CSA soldier's grave stones.....

Have you actually looked at

Have you actually looked at their Bibliography??? The complete list of their online references are to: (i) the webpage of Americana Tours; (ii) a press release from the Sons of the Confederacy; (iii) DVD's on sale with southernbooksellers telling us of the "cover up" that goes back to 1865; (iv) the website of SonsOfTheSouth.net; (v) DVD's specially produced for Dixie Depot and Dixie General Store; and (vi) a book available for sale written by a community college lecturer based upon "unpublished minutes of the meetings of the Escort Veterans Association in his hometown of Tullahoma, Tennessee." Somehow, I've got my doubts.

Hmmm,

Guess you didn't see all the bibliography or you would have mentioned UVA as well, but you just didn't want to look at the information, you based your decision solely off the bibliography. You can't refute actual reports from magazines and books written by Frederick Douglas or Booker T. Washington, so you just ignore all the evidence and base your disbelief soley on the fact that you do not approve of some of those on the bibliography.

not so sure it matters

If the history of the nation, the Constitution, and our founding fathers doesn't matter, then why should the history of slavery. They, the founders and the slaves, are all dead so time to move on, nothing to see here folks.

Just thought I would go progassive for a moment.

But you are in error

History does matter, it is the understanding and interpretation that is sometimes a matter of controversy.

The religious intentions of the founders, the fluidity of the Constitution and the early historical treatment of the indigenous peoples are those parts, among other, that are often interpreted to fit a political agenda.

So liberal or conservative, history does matter…very much so.

Facts are facts, of course, but intentions are very open to interpretation.

The Black Confederate

in some form or another did exist much to the discomfort of many. Blacks were in Confederate service true as servants, cooks, and general labor. However there is the explanation that in some cases Blacks did serve under arms because they felt the South regardless of their situation was in fact home. Another explanation is if they did take up arms in defense of the CSA, then how could the South keep them in servitude? They did exist in unknown numbers but they did exist as some Federal documentation from front line officers demonstrate. See http://www.37thtexas.org/ for more information.

Linking us to a the website

Linking us to a the website of the 37th Texas Calvary Confederate Re-enactment unit? The site's nomenclature of the "War for Southern Independence?" Reference to an article by the South Carolina Voluntary Infantry re one black drummer? This is a joke, right? The group's website itself makes the following "Call to Arms:"

"We have voluntarily removed the History Channel© recommendation of our site and our link to the History Channel© website to show our disgust at "The Unfinished War" which portrayed all reenactors of the War for Southern Independence to be borderline mental cases and Confederate reenactors to be reactionary racists."

Not really a "joke"

You'll need to navigate the website to get a view of what is being presented. Some of the references come from Dean of American Studies Dr. Edward Smith, American University. Read the mission statement in part: "STRIVE to educate others of the multi-racial and multi-ethnic makeup of the Confederate Armed Forces through painstaking research and authentic reenactment of the period 1863 - 1865" To the unknowing BTW most reenactors that you appear to deride take their hobby and history very seriously. Study opens the mind. I believe there is more in this part of Black History than meets the eye and proves the point that sometimes history is an uncomfortable subject best left to open and mature minds.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: Education rss feed    News rss feed   



Toolbox