The Virginian-Pilot
©
KNOTTS ISLAND, N.C.
Sam Sumner retired as a schoolteacher, left his Hawaii home and recently moved to North Carolina, all for the purpose of solving the mystery of the Lost Colony.
The answer lies not in Buxton where experts and amateur sleuths have searched for decades, he says, but at Mackay Island National Wildlife Refuge in Currituck County, a site that leaves experts skeptical.
A 1923 map in the lobby of Mackay Island ranger station shows an image on the ground next to the Currituck Sound that looks just like an old drawing of Fort Raleigh.
"I looked at that map and I knew immediately what it was," Sumner said. "I have the evidence on my side. It is up to the archaeological experts to say the image is not a 16th-century fort."
Sumner, 63, has researched one of America's oldest mysteries for 31 years, traveling almost annually from Hawaii to Roanoke Island. He has partnered with a psychic archaeologist; rented underground radar equipment at budget-busting costs; queried experts; researched books, maps and papers; and written reports.
But the most compelling clue is the map.
Sir Walter Raleigh sent 118 colonists to the New World in 1587 to establish a settlement. Led by John White, they landed at what is now Roanoke Island.
In August 1587, White left for England to get supplies, returning in 1590 to find the colony gone. All he found were the letters CRO carved on a tree and CROATOAN carved on a post. The colony possibly split up, one group going south to Buxton on Hatteras Island where the Croatan Indians lived and the other north toward Chesapeake. White wrote that a group was to go 50 miles inland.
"There are two islands 50 miles away," Sumner said. "One is at Hatteras and one is Knotts Island."
The colonists lived there for 20 years, until 1607, when the Powhatan Indians massacred them, according to a history from 1612. That is another strong piece of evidence they were there, Sumner said.
Forts of that day were made of earth piled high after digging a ditch around the perimeter, said Doug Stover, historian at the Fort Raleigh National Historic Site on Roanoke Island.
The image on the map has a long nose at one end and is star-shaped at the other, just like the old, undocumented drawing used to show what Fort Raleigh may have looked like.
Sumner could seek help through Fort Raleigh if the evidence is strong enough, Stover said. Mackay Island will not issue Sumner a permit to excavate unless he has backing from a sanctioned archaeologist or group.
It is hard to get backing without more evidence and hard to get more evidence without excavating, Sumner said.
Lost Colony researchers do not give credence to his Mackay Island theory.
"We know of no archaeological evidence to indicate a Raleigh colony there," said Phil Evans, president of the First Colony Foundation, a group that researches the Raleigh colonization efforts.
The group would have settled in a place where the Indians were friendly, said Nick Luccketti, principal investigator at the James River Institute for Archaeology and a vice president of the First Colony Foundation.
"I'm not sure Knotts Island fits that bill," he said.
The Mackay Island site, called the Sumner site by Sumner, is now an oval shaped pond. Sumner believes the site, located in low lands, may have been dug out and filled with water for duck ponds.
Joseph Knapp, the wealthy owner of Mackay Island in the 1920s, hunted there and practiced waterfowl conservation.
"They're all looking at Buxton," Sumner said. "No one looks anywhere else."
Jeff Hampton, (252) 338-0159, jeff.hampton@pilotonline.com

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo
The Thoroughgood Link to the Lost Colony
In 1653 Sarah Thoroughgood-Gookin-Yeardley (1609 – 1657) and her third husband, Francis Yeardley, sponsored a boat expedition into the unsettled Currituck and Albemarle sounds of North Carolina, then known as, “the south part of Virginia.” Frances and Sarah did not go but instead sent eighteen-year-old Adam Thoroughgood II, Sarah’s son. The expedition met with the leader of several area tribes including Chief Kiscatanewh of the Pasquotank River Yeopim Indians (related to the Weapemeoc Indians) representing himself as “the great commander in these parts.” The party was escorted to Roanoke Island and shown the ruins of Sir Walter Raleigh's fort (the Lost Colony of 1587). From “The History of Lower Tidewater Virginia,” Volume I, Rogers Dey Whichard, Ph.D., 1959, page 246 – see http://1bob9.blogspot.com/2009/06/old-donation-history.html
I say let him have a go at it..
I don't accept the theory that the colonists would have gone to an area just because the Indians were friendlier there than at another location. I think they would have set up in the best possible place to facilitate them being found and resupplied, and that offered the resources for survival until that happened. Those are the questions that need to be included for the Mackay Island site, would those purposes have been served if they did indeed relocate to there?
The Sumner Site...
The Sumner Site was built by the Ralph Lane expedition (1585-86) landed with 300 men with axes to build forts and fortifications for their military operations against the Spanish. The location selection was excellent. The Sumner Site has a fresh water creek and was built on a bluff protecting it from Hurricanes. Historians say that four or more forts were built and none has been found until I saw the image on the 1923 topo map. They didn't build forts to be near the friendly Indians. This location was plan B for the Lost Colony. A fall back fort built by Ralph Lane. The location was so ideal that it remained hidden intact for over four hundred years.
Is there someone
who does not want the mystery solved? Would it be financially disadvantageous for someone? I hope not.
digp
Please let the man dig what can it hurt.we need to know the truth.its history.
Lost Coloney/Jamestown
This sounds like Jamestown Virginia. For about a century the Experts swore up and down that the fort was in the river. They said that the river had moved and had taken the fort. The funny part was that anybody that had looked at the river new that the river had not moved in that direction, but we the unwashed masses were ignorant. Then this guy figures it out. The mass of anthropologist decide this guy was too stupid to be correct. He was stubborn and continued trying to get permission to dig. After 20yrs. they were tired so they give him one chance and wow he was right. He actually found the corner post of the fort right where he said it was all along. Who says that this isn't the same.
It is a shame that often the so called experts are no better than over zealous religious bigots that they love to ridicule as prehistoric cavemen.
Give3 him a chance and lets see.
He should at least be given a chance to do a dig
I guess to consider the fact that the lost colony may be someplace other than where they have been searching for years would be admitting they were wrong.
If this mans evidence even has the slightest bit of credence then the archeologists should stand behind him and give him the consideration he deserves.
At least let him do a small dig to try and find more evidence of the colonies existence where he believes it was. After all everybody else has been wrong all these years, what, are they afraid they wont get the recognition he will get if he is in fact right? give me a break.
Let this man do a dig!