©
From staff and wire reports
WASHINGTON
Military officials said Tuesday they have begun accepting applications from openly gay and lesbian recruits, creating a dilemma for many homosexuals who long have wanted to join the armed forces but worry that their status will be jeopardized if the controversial "don't ask, don't tell" policy is reimposed.
Also on Tuesday, a federal judge in California refused to set aside her injunction halting enforcement of the policy, which she has ruled unconstitutional.
Obama administration lawyers are expected to file a formal appeal with the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco to stop U.S. District Judge Virginia Phillips' ban and allow the Pentagon to continue its internal review of the policy.
With the policy at this point legally no longer in force, the Pentagon announced that recruiters have begun taking applications from men and women who say they are gay or lesbian.
"Recruiters have been given guidance, and they will process applications for applicants who admit they are openly gay or lesbian," said Cynthia O. Smith, a Pentagon spokeswoman.
Smith noted that recruiters have been told to remind applicants that the court injunction could quickly be reversed. If that occurred, she said, statements by recruits that they are homosexual could be used to reject them immediately or discharge them if they had been accepted into the service.
Under the "don't ask, don't tell" law, enacted in 1993 during the Clinton administration, recruits have not been asked about their sexual orientation when they seek to enlist - a policy that the Pentagon said would remain in effect while the litigation continues, she said.
But also under the law, anyone who freely states that he or she is a homosexual is removed from the ranks of the military.
Last week, Clifford L. Stanley, the undersecretary of defense for personnel and readiness, reminded recruiters in a memo not to ask service members or applicants about their sexual orientation.
Many advocates, including Aubrey Sarvis, executive director of the Servicemembers Legal Defense Network, urged would-be recruits to proceed carefully.
"During this interim period of uncertainty," Sarvis said, "service members must not come out and recruits should use caution if choosing to sign up. The bottom line: If you come out now, it can be used against you in the future by the Pentagon."
One of the first to take the opportunity to enlist was former Army Lt. Dan Choi, a Tustin, Calif., native and Iraq war veteran who came out on the "Rachel Maddow Show" on cable TV in March 2009. The West Point graduate was discharged earlier this year for being gay.
Choi, 29, made an event of his re-enlistment, tweeting his movements as he strolled through midtown Manhattan to the Times Square recruiting station. There, he rapped on the glass door, entered and asked to enlist in the Marines.
They said he was too old, so Choi filled out papers to re-enlist in the Army.
"We're still in a war, and soldiers are needed," Choi said. "I have a newfound faith in our government that at least one branch is on the side of the Constitution, is on the side of the people."
In Los Angeles, Army recruiters were abiding by the Pentagon's new directive, but they did not report a groundswell of new recruits.
"Right now, we can't ask, but they can tell," said Fernando Sanjurjo, spokesman for the Army's Los Angeles Recruiting Battalion. "We're going to do whatever we're told to do and drive on. But no influx yet."
Sanjuro added that potential recruits are being told that the "don't ask, don't tell" policy could be reinstated at any time by the appellate courts.
In Hampton Roads, Sgt. Louis Spenyovics, one of about seven recruiters at an Army recruiting station near Battlefield Boulevard in Chesapeake, said he and his co-workers have not been informed of a policy change.
"It will probably come down in the next couple days," Spenyovics said. He said the office has not been deluged with queries from gay potential recruits. For now, if recruiters are asked about military service for homosexuals, they'll say what they've been saying for years: "It's a DOD (Department of Defense) policy - 'don't ask, don't tell.' "
Aaron Belkin, director of Palm Center, a think tank on gays and the military at the University of California-Santa Barbara, called the military's announcement on accepting gay recruits a "stunt" because many legal experts expect the appellate court to reinstate the ban while they review the case.
Meanwhile, supporters of the "don't ask, don't tell" policy, such as the conservative Family Research Council, said "homosexuals are desperate" to get into the military, but the government should continue to fight in the courts and on Capitol Hill to keep the ban in place.
This story was compiled from reports by the Tribune Washington Bureau and Pilot writer Kate Wiltrout.

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo


Who cares about this story.
They should have been accepting appliations from gays decades ago. How about reporting on how the military is rifting career officers who have served in Iraq and Afghanistan and is now beating them out of their retirement.
They used stop loss against individuals whose enlistment was up to prevent them from getting out during their senseless oil war in the desert and now turn around and rift career officers who served in both Iraq and Afghanistan who actually want to stay and serve their country. I guess since they wasted billions of dollars on these senseless wars now they can't afford to pay them anymore.
Support our troops. Uncle Sam Wants you. What a crock.
hmmmmm
Was it not long ago that a congressman or senator got caught playing toe tap under the stall? if I remember correctly they ran him out of DC, and all these same politicians want to force them onto our ships and installations. unreal....
Former Senator Larry Craig was arrested for lewd conduct.
Craig was publicly anti-gay and portrayed himself as a strict moralist conservative. His HYPOCRICY was the issue. Craig announced his intention to resign from the Senate at a news conference on September 1, 2007, but later decided to finish the remainder of his term. He did not run again because he had lost the confidence of the voters. Don't you read the news?
Congress has openly gay members, so your whole premise is bogus.
To be so grossly in error on this I suggest you may have many other misconceptions in your closet.
STANDBY FOR ANOTHER MESS
After 30 years of service and many on aicraft carriers, I hope this is not another mess that come about when they put women on them. Don't want to hear the equal performance bit; it involves plain ole sex, nothing more or less. Any leader that served aboard a large ship can tell you what an administrative nightmare and energy required to mediate sexual behavior. Here's a secret, we have women on those large ships and the Navy likes to say it's a success. However, it's a mess and they all know it, but would dare to say so in public....any Sailor that have served on a ship know I am right despite that it is PC to say so. This ruling will be a mess too, but no one will have the guts to say so...just watch.
Fast 500
My thoughts exactly. Just wait until the multitude of legal claims from those previously discharged, requests for transfers and other legal quagmires hit the decks. Mullins and Gates messed up by dragging their feet on this issue and now they have a bigger administrative burden to resolve.
Sanity at last.
The exclusion of alternate lifestyle people from a field of employment based on prejudices of others has long been nonsensical and unjust.
I shall never forget the
I shall never forget the unspeakable horror that froze the lymph in my glands when the baneful word seared my reeling brain - I was a homosexual. I thought of the painted simpering female impersonators I'd seen in a Baltimore nightclub. Could it be possible I was one of those subhuman things? I walked the streets in a daze like a man with a light concussion. I would've destroyed myself. And a wise old queen - Bobo, we called her - taught me that I had a duty to live and bear my burden proudly for all to see.
Laws
This is a very bad thing for the US military when civilian courts set the standards for the UCMJ, we should not even have a paid military anymore. The courts will be able to dictate anything that happens in the military from this point on. We have a commanding chief that is inept at doing his job, he uses things like this to say my hands are tied. It does not matter whether you are gay or heterosexual, keep that mess to yourself. You do not have to pro-fess your sexual preference to me or anyone else, in fact I think that is something that is personal and should stay that way. The courts have set rules for our school system and that has really worked out just spiffy fine. Now they are going after another government entity and we will be throwing leaflets at the enemy before long. This is about power and votes for our politicians nothing more. Give us our economy back, stop letting the jobs be taken out of this country. We need jobs right now, deal with the rest of red herrings after we can pay off our bills and keep our houses.
COURT SYSTEM
Of course a federal judge would overturn what this administration wanted all along, after all, why would he/she overturn daddy. What's ironic is in this case it is up to the Congress not some bleeding heart liberal judge. I ask the question, what happens when a heterosexual male is roomed with a homosexual male, does the heterosexual male have the option to choose to room with another heterosexual male? I'm sorry, but I am so glad I no longer serve, to force liberal tolerance on fighting American men and women is only going to make matters worse.
"And I am dumb to tell the lover's tomb
How at my sheet goes the same crooked worm."