The Virginian-Pilot
©
RICHMOND
Virginia's future as a leader in energy production remains linked to indefinitely delayed plans for oil and natural gas drilling miles off the state coastline, Gov. Bob McDonnell said Wednesday at an energy conference he convened.
That exploration "is a part of American s' energy future that should go forward," McDonnell said, one day after federal officials lifted a ban on deepwater drilling imposed after the Gulf oil spill last spring.
In March, McDonnell, an offshore drilling advocate, celebrated a federal decision to advance plans for leasing ocean floor tracts for drilling.
But his excitement was short-lived - those plans were shelved after the April explosion aboard the Deepwater Horizon rig in the Gulf of Mexico.
Despite that disappointment, McDonnell said he believes "Virginia will be an offshore energy leader."
The governor's message echoed many of the themes he's previously stressed, including the need to produce more energy in Virginia, a state he said imports nearly one-third of its electricity.
Meeting that demand requires a strategy that relies on traditional fuels, nuclear power, and biological and renewable alternatives such as offshore wind, McDonnell said.
"The best winds in the country anywhere outside of the United States Congress are off the shores of Virginia," McDonnell said, taking a jab at federal officials. "What we've got to do is find a way to harness it in a commercially practicable way."
He also called for an easing of federal environmental regulations and bureaucratic red tape, which he said can hinder private investments in energy technology that would lead to increased production and spur job growth.
Virginia Sierra Club Director Glen Besa was unmoved by the governor's message.
"He offered no new initiatives whatsoever," Besa said, calling the energy summit a "conference in search of a purpose" that provided the governor a chance to repeat "his blame game of the federal government."
If McDonnell wanted to do something meaningful, Besa added, he would push for mandatory energy efficiency standards and implement a weatherization program to put jobless laborers back to work.
Asked why he didn't unveil any new energy proposals, McDonnell said the intent of the conference is to bring together various energy experts, not launch new initiatives.
The governor said some new energy proposals may be unveiled during next year's General Assembly session.
Delivering the keynote address on the second night of the three-day conference was Texas oil and gas magnate T. Boone Pickens, who advocates an energy plan based on weaning America off foreign sources.
America consumes 21 million of the 86 million barrels of oil produced daily around the globe, said Pickens, calling that rate "unsustainable."
"We have plenty of energy in America to get us off the oil that is coming from the dangerous area, which is the Mide ast," he said. "We are buying oil from the enemy."
To end the nation's dependence on foreign energy exports, Pickens advocates mining vast reservoirs of natural gas contained in coal shale deposits.
He also supports offshore drilling and energy generation from renewable sources, such as offshore wind.
"I'm a real simple guy," Pickens said. "I'll take anything that's American."
Pickens said one way to start the transition is for public officials to commit to purchasing only government fleet vehicles that run on domestic energy sources.
Another is to educate the American public about the energy situation, said Pickens, who advised McDonnell to add energy instruction to the state's education curriculum.
Julian Walker, (804) 697-1564, julian.walker@pilotonline.com

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo
Wake up and Smell the Oil for Gods Sake!!!!
Amazing how stupid Virginians can be. McDonnell has been on the take with Big Oil companies even before he was elected. He is just their paid puppet. Wake up Virginians and SMELL THE OIL!
Whose future?
The only future here is short-run benefits for the status quo.
Offshore Energy - If it can
Offshore Energy - If it can be done right, Virginians will get it right or else find something better along the way. Forward Y'all!
Wind generated power ...?
Trying to harness wind energy to produce electricity has proved to be non-effecient and unreliable every where it's been tried.If wind energy could compete with conventional sources like coal, natural gas or nuclear, there wouldn't be any need for a federal law forcing us to use it, which is exactly what this administration is trying to do. Studies have shown that alternative ("renewable") sources would raise residential electric bills by 36 percent, or about $300 annually for an average household of four. Industrial electricity costs would be even harder hit, rising by 60 percent.
Some glaring problems are: Wind turbines tend to be pricey relative to the amount of juice they generate. Also,multi-billion-dollar transmission-line projects(to get the energy from the wind turbine to the customers) would be required - with customers (that's you and me) picking up the tab. Thirdly, wind doesn't blow constantly. So, it must always be backed up by reliable non-wind sources, ready to step in and carry the load. Thus, utilities can't really cut back on conventional electricity sources when they add wind to the mix. For this reason, an electric system that's forced to include wind becomes a
The Danes get 20% of their energy from wind power
The Danes get 20% of their energy from wind power. Are they smarter than us? Yes.
I think that proves the previous point.
Because now you ask, where does the other 80% come from? Plus, what happens during a calm spell?
WIND FARMS
The issue of using wind farms to lower rates and supply energy has many unclear and hidden costs. Massachusetts has approved a wind farm off Cape Cod in Nantucket Sound. The costs for building and installing the wind farm is being passed on to consumers who will see, on average 1.9-2.3% rate increases. For example, a small business such as a small mom & pop restaurant will see an approx $100 per month rate increase, and larger businesses such as a third generation family owned paper mill in western Massachusetts will see an approx $9,500 per month / $114,000 per year rate increase.
It is not cheap to build and the eventual benefits are a long way down the road when relying on wind for power. The companies and conglomerates touting the advantages of wind are only showing one side of the effort; the side that will benefit them and not the average consumer. When deciding on this issue, the public really needs to hear all the aspects and not just listen to those who are getting their pockets padded from those selling it.
The guv tells a big one. What do you expect from an oil man?
"The best winds in the country anywhere outside of the United States Congress are off the shores of Virginia," McDonnell said, taking a jab at federal officials."
Pure ignorance from my governor, again.
Offshore New England has more wind than Virginia, Bobby.
I guess the Regent University graduate has never been west of the Mississippi River either.
http://rredc.nrel.gov/wind/pubs/atlas/maps.html
at least he has a sense of humor
The JOKE is obvious - he was JOKING about Congress (and "bragging" about Virginia).
What difference does it make if the consistent average wind speed is higher off Martha's Vineyard than those of the Capes? It really doesn't.
I really hope that HUMOR is learned well before attending college in everyone's world. I really hope that people don't feel the need to find fault with someone just because of the "R" (or "D") next to their name. Please take the time to learn humor and that political opponents are opponent and NOT enemies.