The Virginian-Pilot
©
HAMPTON
Supporters of a "pollution diet" to hasten the Chesapeake Bay cleanup outnumbered critics Thursday night in the final public meeting in Virginia on the controversial topic.
Wearing lapel stickers proclaiming "I support clean water," a crowd of students, environmentalists and senior citizens told state officials in attendance to stop delaying action and support the diet pushed by the Environmental Protection Agency and the Obama administration.
"I would like to see this state take the lead on this issue instead of
lagging light - years behind," said Benjamin Duff, a Virginia Beach resident and member of the Sierra Club and Chesapeake Bay Foundation.
The meeting in a hotel conference room in Hampton was a stark contrast to an earlier one in the Shenandoah Valley, where farmers and politicians sharply criticized the plan as too intrusive, expensive and scientifically flawed.
Farmers from the Eastern Shore and Essex County came Thursday night and said they only want to be treated fairly. Chiefly, they said they have been taking strides, voluntarily and without government money, to curb nutrients and sediment that might wash off their fields and taint streams and creeks that feed the Bay.
Now, they argued, those measures are not being counted in computer models that define how much pollution the Bay can tolerate and still meet all clean-water standards.
"Please don't regulate us," Bruce Holland, a farmer from Accomack County, pleaded.
The plan in question is called a Total Maximum Daily Load. It calls for six mid-Atlantic states and the District of Columbia to cut nitrogen and phosphorus pollution by 25 percent over the next 15 years and sediment runoff by 16 percent.
If it is achieved through tighter controls on farms, development sites, urban storm drains and air pollutants, the EPA believes the Bay will finally come off the national dirty waters list.
"If this was easy, if it was cheap, if it was simple, I wouldn't be here tonight," said Jeff Corbin, a special EPA adviser on Chesapeake Bay matters and a former Chesapeake Bay Foundation scientist in Virginia.
Anthony Moore, Gov. Bob McDonnell's assistant secretary for Bay restoration, said Virginia is cooperating with the EPA effort but thinks it can attain reductions "without a lot of new programs or new regulations."
Moore said the state needs "to tweak" some existing programs and encourage farmers, cities and developers through incentives to continue progress.
Virginia's plan was deemed short of meeting the mark when it was submitted to the EPA last month. The agency, in turn, added "backstops," suggesting the state must do more to cut pollution.
One federal direction is to force sewage treatment plants to reduce the nitrogen and phosphorus flowing back into the Bay.
Ted Henifin, general manager of the Hampton Roads Sanitation District, which operates most sewage plants in the region, said the crackdown would cost $690 million. That would translate into significant rate hikes to tens of thousands of residents and businesses.
To Andy Baan, a Virginia Beach dad who brought his sons to the meeting and who described himself as "a conservative Republican guy," putting off investments is becoming too common in America. "Let's not delay this anymore," Baan said.

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo
Farmers and sewage treatment folks need to take immediate action
Farmers and sewage treatment folks need to take immediate action, but not until the tens of thousands of residential, city and commercial lawn care people throughout HR stop blowing grass down our storm drains every week. It's clogging up all of the inland tidal waterways with a tremendous amount of grassy sludge. Just go out and wade in it, will you. Not a pretty picture. And take the time to see just which waterway the stormwater runoff from your neighborhood goes. City and commercial workers blowing grass and clippings out into the roadways and down storm drains need to be arrested and fined!
Who will pay - everyone
This effort will be spread out over four sectors. 1) HRSD is already in a consent decree and will not likely see much more in the way of reductions. The costs associated with them are already on the way. 2) The ag community has been left out of the equation so far. Not anymore, they will be required to participate at some expense to their businesses. Those costs will have to get passed on. 3) Development will get even costlier and some measures require retrofitting existing development. There will be huge costs for business in an already tight economy. 4) State and local government will be tasked with regulating the new requirements. That will mean new programs, new legislation and new fees.
The usual controversy
The industrial/farming communities will object, because it means undoing years of doing business the "usual way", whatever that is, and will be backed by the politicians who get their financial support. One would think that the fishing/crabbing industry would be behind the cleanup efforts, (well, maybe not the menhaden group), as a cleaner bay would increase quantity and quality of the catch.
Is the A.G going to fight the federal Gov on this one?
Green house effect is refuted so is he going to deny the levels of pollution for the pro business stance?
It is the same old song
that is being sung in Richmond. "Virginia is cooperating with the EPA effort but thinks it can attain reductions 'without a lot of new programs or new regulations.'" Using incentives, a euphemism for money, the state will encourage the polluters to amend their ways. Where will the state get the money?
The Hampton Roads Sanitation District, a big polluter as operator of most sewage plants, obviously has studied the problem it creates because it already knows how much it would cost to fix it: $690 million. That number, spread over the tens of thousands of users, over a long period of time, say ten years or more, is not a "significant rate hike" but, even if it were, it would be a worthwhile infrastructure investment.
The bottom line is not always the answer.
Time to Act or Time to Run - Virginia's Call
Virginia loves its businesses and farmers. Less so the citizens and the Bay it appears. We have already done a bunch, just leave us alone and we will do what we can when we believe it is warranted and when a bit of extra cash is available, in essence what the state plan reveals. The corporate farmer has a part to play as does the dummy in the car flippin ciggie butts out the window. The mega developer has a part in this fix as does the homeowner dumping a ton of fertilizer on the lawn two hours before a gully washer. Insist on more actons by the Commonwealth and be prepared to support those actions when applied.
It's time for Virginia to embrace this current federal push for
Chesapeake Bay restoration.
This is an opportunity to join forces in a cooperative effort that could be a start of something truely meaningful on a number of levels for all Virginians and that of future generations.
Yes, the realities of fixing our infrastructure and how we interact with nature seems daunting at this point, but it's not like we really have a choice. At man's current rate of stretching planet Earth's resources we are very near a turning point.
We are the gate keepers of this majestic estuary and first in line to reap it's rewards. We should be taking a leadership role in it's rehab instead of politics as usual.
Bob does not represent Virginians, he is here for his own personal gain along with a horde capital interest cronies residing in Ricmond. Kick these bums out and give me a governor with leadership qualities who represents the people and can see that Virginia's future resides in the Chesapeake.