68°
forecast

A change in online comments

Posted to: Donald Luzzatto Opinion

On Monday, the Opinion channel at PilotOnline.com will change.

You'll still find columns like this one, editorials and letters at the region's electronic town square. What you won't find is anonymous comments about them.

Instead, we hope Opinion channel comments will become more like the letters column next door - smart, contentious, civil, responsible. Signed with real names and hometowns, so we all know who's doing the talking.

There is one reason we're making this change. Since the first online message board opened (and The Pilot's was among the first), newspapers have struggled with conflicting impulses. We want to provide a space where people can express themselves. But anonymity, while freeing for a few, also can be so corrosive that it repels as many participants as it encourages.

In the Opinion section, our first responsibility is to the conversation itself. After long consideration, we realized our policies were undermining it online. After watching conversation after conversation devolve, and after hearing from reader after reader complaining that we were encouraging the kind of debate we often lament, we decided to make a change.

Thankfully, we had a handy model. We also had plenty of reason.

Everything on the Opinion pages is signed. This and other columns are signed. Letters are signed. Editorials are signed by six people, every one of whom takes responsibility for them.

Comments at PilotOnline.com are literally the only part of this newspaper's Opinion effort that are anonymous. The resulting asymmetry has led anonymous folks to cross all kinds of lines, of course. But it has also led to a conversation too easily hijacked or diverted and far less than it could be.

There are plenty of places where you can comment anonymously if you choose, including on PilotOnline.com's news content. But not here. Not on the electronic version of The Pilot's Opinion pages.

Anonymity simply doesn't further our mission: Identifying and amplifying solutions to our problems, holding leaders accountable, celebrating our successes.

When we decided to make this change, we also had to decide how. As we were searching for ways to ensure that people are who they say they are, we settled on something many of us use every day: A credit card.

Essentially, you verify your identity by completing a credit card authorization. It doesn't cost anything. It is free. The price is absolutely zero.

You do that once, and you then become what we're calling a "verified commenter."

We don't keep your card number. We won't sell you anything. We won't give away your name. The only thing we do is verify that you are who you say you are. You can find more info at our FAQ at the Opinion channel, under my name.

In exchange for becoming verified, you can comment in the PilotOnline.com Opinion channel, and your comments will appear as soon as you write them, which isn't always the case now.

Is it a perfect system? Nope. Is it the simplest and most reliable one we could think of, both for you and for us? It is. I'm already verified, as are members of the editorial staff.

Critics - many of them anonymous - have claimed that this page is making these changes to silence dissent. I try to be respectful of all opinions, but that one's just silly.

I know there are plenty of echo chambers out there, but this isn't one. This is a town square, filled with ideas and opinions of every kind. Letters criticizing our editorials get priority. We print Objections! to editorials on a regular basis. Our columnists come in every political stripe. Our letter writers reflect the breadth of opinion in Hampton Roads.

It doesn't matter one bit to us whether you agree or disagree with the editorial board. It matters whether you have good ideas and the interest to share them.

I'm sure that the people who have already become verified don't agree with the Editorial Board every day. I know for a fact that most don't.

They do, I hope, share the belief that ownership of words leads to responsibility. That there's no room for people wearing masks in a town square, and that there is real value in knowing who's standing next to you, even metaphorically.

My hunch is that this change will alter how we talk to each other in the Opinion section at PilotOnline.com Exactly how much, I wish I knew. Nobody has tried this before.

The Pilot will go first, happily and with a little trepidation. Please join us.

Donald Luzzatto is The Virginian-Pilot's editorial page editor. E-mail: donald.luzzatto@pilotonline.com.

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

It has been a little over a week now and despite telling myself

that I was going to be objective and see how things develop I already am finding myself reading the Pilot online less.

I am more than a little put off that only the credit worthy are allowed to express an opinion now. Thousands of people in Hampton Roads are living paycheck to pay check, and thousands more have lost their jobs and don't have a paycheck period. (No money means no credit card) You have silenced their voices, and that deeply disturbs me.

I am also uneasy with the concept of registering opinions. Blame George Orwell.

Mr. Luzzatto,

why were my comments stricken from your latest editorial from a week ago ? Sunday, you know, before your deadline ?

You sir, are a wet blanket and a threat to free speach.

More of the same

More control, supression of free speech. Do they wonder why they are going out of business?

Kudos

... and thank you for an overdue change. Now, if only V-P news articles could garner as much respect. That's why I enjoy WSJ and NYT online articles... respectful discourse.

Bravo!

This will decrease the volume on the noise, from those who comment in the blind. I welcome the opinions of those who stand by their words with their good name.

Let the conversation begin!

Paul Schubert
Virginia Beach

New policy regarding Opinions commentors identity

Hmmmm, well it seems to me that this is a bit misguided. You think that you can prevent problems by having a persons credit card as proof of identity? Does that mean then you will protect that information as well as you proof your articles and headlines including AP dispatches? I think you are going a bit too far to require a credit card to prove identity so I am afraid this shall be my last post regarding opinions as I choose not to participate. No wonder newspapers are spiraling in freefall in regards to readership, including online editions.

Perfect Example.....

I have serious concerns, as I have already expressed, about this change, and the reasons.

Because...you don't go after the VBCPS spending habits with the same zeal as other public entites? Why? Fear? Lazy? Incompetence?

While you are attacking CC for crazy spending...the VBCPS has spent taxpayer $$ and childrens future's on unnecessary and unproven technology, curriculum material's, curriculum personnel, etc.

You are doing a disservice to those of us in the classroom and with questionable motives. You can't attack the need for better schools while not investigating what they do with their $$...and for us in the classroom, it is as important as any public expenditure.

These concerns are why I don't use my name and never will.

Mr. Luzzatto.

Would sign your real name to a letter criticizing the ownership and management of the Virginian-Pilot?

Military

Has always been told that it was okay to comment as a private citizen, just not to use the military title in any opinions given. We'll now see if that works as advertised, won't we?

Some do not have credit cards

I understand the issue and the credit card option is understandable, but not everyone chooses to have a credit card. Therefore, another option in addition to the credit card should be considered. I would suggest a photo copy of a recent utility bill be faxed or emailed in to verify identy. That way you would not be keeping out those who for whatever reason chose not to have or cannot get a credit card (some may have credit worthiness issues OR young college or high school students that do not have credit yet)

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: Donald Luzzatto rss feed    Opinion rss feed   


Toolbox