70°
forecast

Feds expected to ban alcoholic energy drinks

Posted to: Business Consumer - Retail News

By Mary Clare Jalonick and Michael Gormley

WASHINGTON

The Food and Drug Administration is expected to find that caffeine is an unsafe food additive to alcoholic drinks, essentially banning them, and manufacturers will then be warned that marketing caffeinated alcoholic beverages could be illegal.

The FDA ruling, which could come as soon as this week, "should be the nail in the coffin of these dangerous and toxic drinks," Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., who has pushed the Obama administration to ban the beverages, said Tuesday. Federal regulators would not confirm Schumer's announcement that a ban was imminent.

While there is little known medical evidence that the drinks are less safe than other alcoholic drinks, public health advocates say the drinks can make people feel more alert and able to handle tasks like driving. A Wake Forest University study found that students who combine caffeine and alcohol are more likely to suffer alcohol-related injuries than those drinking alcohol without caffeine.

College students have been hospitalized after drinking the beverages, including the popular Four Loko. That beverage comes in several varieties, including fruit punch and blue raspberry. A 23.5-ounce can sells for about $2.50 and has an alcohol content of 12 percent, comparable to four beers, according to the company's website.

Four states — Washington, Michigan, Utah and Oklahoma — have banned the beverages and other states are considering similar action. Police in Mesa, Ariz., said an "extremely intoxicated" teenager smashed her SUV into a tree Sunday morning after reportedly playing "beer pong" with Four Loko.

Last year the FDA notified more than two dozen manufacturers of caffeinated alcoholic beverages that it had never specifically approved the addition of caffeine to alcoholic drinks and began studying whether it is unsafe and should be outlawed. The agency noted the mix's growing popularity among college students and its potential health and safety issues.

The FDA said then it had not reached a conclusion about its safety but cited concerns from state attorneys general from several states who contended the drinks appeal to underage drinkers and encourage reckless behavior.

FDA spokeswoman Siobhan DeLancey would not confirm any upcoming action but said the agency recognizes "this very important public health issue" and will announce the results of its review when it is complete. The Federal Trade Commission, which would deal with marketing issues, declined to comment.

Gormley reported from Albany, N.Y.

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

So, then

If I have a glass of wine with dinner and coffee afterward, will the Feds run in and arrest me?

Why not?

Would it not have been enough to simply state these drinks pose an added risk over other choices and leave it at that?

Soooo

Liberals are in favor of legalizing cancer causing drugs, but a delicious sparks should be banned?

What kind of dream world do they live in.

What?

What in the world are you talking about???? That makes no sense whatsoever.

did you read the article?

Chuck Schumer a DEMOCRAT is pushing the president a DEMOCRAT to ban the drinks.

Legalizing marijuana is a staple liberal position.

Marijuana is carcinogenic.

Sparks is a delicious malt liquor energy drink of the type they want to ban.

Put it all together...

But the college kids can

But the college kids can still go into any 7-11 and legally buy a lethal substance - tobacco, which we've known for over 60 years kills millions around the world every year. I don't get it.

what's the difference

And a rum and coke is not the same ?? idiots in the gov't

What would you expect?

What would you expect out of the ultra-liberal, government-loving Schumer? The more government control over YOUR life the happier he is.

The FDA is a Revolving Door for Big PHARMA & Frankin Foods

The problem is that the same people that are supposed to regulate… yes regulate, like: (Finance, Mortgage, and Banking Industry) sound familiar? ...are in bed with manufacturers that are allowed to introduce these toxic products in the market.

Sorry if your sales go down and your teeny weenie jobs are lost, but meet reality. This stuff is hurting people! Recall the bouncer that had a heart attack a few years ago mixing Red Bully with that cough syrup called Yeager Monster? How long will it take them to ban Spice and K2? Guess that they have a stronger lobby?

I'm really confused... I

I'm really confused... I thought abusing cough syrup (like huffing paint) was already illegal. I don't think the fact that he added it to Red Bull was the main issue. The state currently has a bill in the works to ban Spice.

I don't drink them because I think they taste terrible, but I would much rather see laws derived from research then irrational fears. You act like if these drinks are made illegal it will stop college kids from both drinking and adding caffine to drinks.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: Business rss feed    Consumer - Retail rss feed    News rss feed   



Toolbox